Suppr超能文献

迈向人人安全饮水和清洁烹饪目标。

Towards safe drinking water and clean cooking for all.

机构信息

Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Mar;9(3):e361-e365. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30476-9. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Abstract

The public health community has tried for decades to show, through evidence-based research, that safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and clean cooking fuels that reduce household air pollution are essential to safeguard health and save lives in low-income and middle-income countries. In the past 40 decades, there have been many innovations in the development of low-cost and efficacious technologies for WASH and household air pollution, but many of these technologies have been associated with disappointing health outcomes, often because low-income households have either not adopted, or inconsistently adopted, these technologies. In this Viewpoint, we argue that public health researchers (ourselves included) have had an oversimplified understanding of poverty; our work has not focused on insights into the lived experience of poverty, with its uncertainties, stresses from constant scarcity, and attendant fears. Such insights are central to understanding why technologies for safe water or clean cooking are unused by so many households that could benefit from them. We argue that, rather than improved versions of household-scale delivery models, transformative investments in safe water and clean cooking for all require utility-scale service models. Until then, research should focus on interim safe water and clean cooking options that are directed towards the utility-scale service model.

摘要

公共卫生界几十年来一直试图通过循证研究表明,安全用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)以及减少家庭空气污染的清洁烹饪燃料,对于保障低收入和中等收入国家的健康和拯救生命至关重要。在过去的 40 年中,已经有许多创新的低成本和有效的 WASH 和家庭空气污染技术得到了发展,但这些技术中的许多都与令人失望的健康结果相关,这通常是因为低收入家庭要么没有采用,要么没有一致地采用这些技术。在本观点中,我们认为公共卫生研究人员(包括我们自己)对贫困的理解过于简单化;我们的工作并没有关注对贫困生活经历的深入了解,包括其不确定性、持续稀缺带来的压力以及随之而来的恐惧。这些见解对于理解为什么如此多本可以从中受益的家庭不使用安全用水或清洁烹饪技术至关重要。我们认为,对于所有人来说,安全用水和清洁烹饪的变革性投资需要采用公用事业规模的服务模式,而不是家庭规模的供应模式的改进版本。在此之前,研究应侧重于针对公用事业规模服务模式的临时安全用水和清洁烹饪选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验