Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Feb;127(2):25001. doi: 10.1289/EHP4752.
Research often suffers from overspecialization, a practice nurtured in academia and reinforced by funders. Indeed, investigators in household air pollution (HAP) and water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH), working in poor parts of the world, rarely interact despite having similar training and using similar methods to evaluate interventions in the same vulnerable populations. Disappointing results from recent trials of improved cookstoves and traditional approaches to WaSH suggest the need for alternative approaches.
We argue that bringing these two areas together would improve the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions to reduce the massive disease burden associated with HAP and poor WaSH, including pneumonia and diarrhea, the leading killers of young children in low-income countries.
HAP and WaSH face similar challenges in designing, implementing, and securing the sustained and exclusive use of scalable interventions such as clean fuel and water.
Research can advance greater coordination of these areas by demonstrating their interactions and wider impacts on well-being as well as the potential for programmatic synergies. Integrated solutions to clean households and communities can benefit from the contribution in multiple disciplines, including economics and policy analysis; business and finance; engineering and technology; lab sciences, environmental health, and biomedical sciences; and behavioral and implementation sciences.
There are compelling reasons to overcome the artificial and unproductive segregation of HAP and WaSH. Researchers should encourage integration by expanding the scope of their collaborations and projects. Policy makers, funders, and implementers can help by supporting comprehensive solutions, encouraging innovation, and requiring rigorous evaluations of their effects. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4752.
研究往往受到过度专业化的影响,这种做法在学术界得到了培养,并得到了资助者的加强。事实上,尽管从事家庭空气污染 (HAP) 和水、环境卫生和个人卫生 (WaSH) 的研究人员在世界贫困地区工作,但他们很少互动,尽管他们有相似的培训并使用相似的方法来评估对同一弱势群体的干预措施。最近改进炉灶和传统 WaSH 方法的试验结果令人失望,表明需要替代方法。
我们认为将这两个领域结合起来将提高减少与 HAP 和不良 WaSH 相关的巨大疾病负担的干预措施的有效性和效率,包括肺炎和腹泻,这是低收入国家幼儿的主要杀手。
在设计、实施和确保可扩展干预措施(如清洁燃料和水)的持续和专用使用方面,HAP 和 WaSH 面临着类似的挑战。
通过展示它们对福祉的相互作用和更广泛的影响,以及方案协同增效的潜力,研究可以促进这些领域的更大协调。清洁家庭和社区的综合解决方案可以受益于多个学科的贡献,包括经济学和政策分析;商业和金融;工程和技术;实验室科学、环境卫生和生物医学科学;以及行为和实施科学。
克服 HAP 和 WaSH 人为和无益的隔离有充分的理由。研究人员应通过扩大合作和项目的范围来鼓励整合。政策制定者、资助者和执行者可以通过支持综合解决方案、鼓励创新以及要求对其效果进行严格评估来提供帮助。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4752.