Department of Urology, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin 300170, China.
Department of Pediatrics, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin 300170, China.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):102896. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102896. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
This study aims to propose a novel and effective throat swab collection method for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The subjects were asked to open their mouth to make "ah" sound (traditional method) or simulate yawn (improved method) for throat swab collection. The usage of tongue depressor, collection time, adverse reactions and subjective discomfort (VAS score) were compared. The collection time, comprehensive indicators of adverse reactions and VAS score were also compared among three collectors.
The tongue depressor was less used in the improved group (χ = 40.186, P < 0.01). The average collection time of the traditional group was 5.44 ± 2.97 and that of the improved group was 4.00 ± 2.31 (P < 0.01). The subjects in the improved group had fewer and milder adverse reactions. The VAS score of subjects in the improved group was lower than that in the traditional group (P < 0.01). Among different collectors, the collection time, comprehensive indicators of adverse reactions and VAS were the same as the overall trend.
Simulating yawn is a safer and faster throat swab collection method.
本研究旨在提出一种新型且有效的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)咽拭子采集方法。
将受试者随机分为两组。要求受试者张口发出“啊”声(传统方法)或模拟打哈欠(改良方法)进行咽拭子采集。比较使用压舌板、采集时间、不良反应和主观不适(VAS 评分)。还比较了三位采集者的采集时间、不良反应综合指标和 VAS 评分。
改良组使用压舌板的情况较少(χ=40.186,P<0.01)。传统组的平均采集时间为 5.44±2.97,改良组为 4.00±2.31(P<0.01)。改良组受试者的不良反应较少且较轻。改良组受试者的 VAS 评分低于传统组(P<0.01)。在不同的采集者中,采集时间、不良反应综合指标和 VAS 与总体趋势相同。
模拟打哈欠是一种更安全、更快的咽拭子采集方法。