Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
EA 4483-IMPECS-IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine, Univ. Lille, Lille, France.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0245434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245434. eCollection 2021.
The single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) interpretation needs the comparison of measured values to reference values. In 2017, the Global Lung Function Initiative published new reference values (GLI-2017) for DLCO, alveolar volume (VA) and transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide (KCO). We aimed to assess the applicability of GLI-2017 reference values for DLCO on a large population by comparing them to the European Community of Steel and Coal equations of 1993 (ECSC-93) widely used.
In this retrospective study, spirometric indices, total lung capacity, DLCO, VA and KCO were measured in adults classified in 5 groups (controls, asthma, chronic bronchitis, cystic fibrosis, and interstitial lung diseases (ILD)). Statistical analysis comparing the 2 equations sets were stratified by sex.
4180 tests were included. GLI-2017 z-scores of the 3 DLCO indices of the controls (n = 150) are nearer to 0 (expected value in a normal population) than ECSC-93 z-scores. All groups combined, in both genders, DLCO GLI-2017 z-scores and %predicted are significantly higher than ECSC z-scores and %predicted. In the ILD group, differences between the 2 equation sets depend on the DLCO impairment severity: GLI-2017 z-scores are higher than ECSC z-scores in patients with no or "mild" decrease in DLCO, but are lower in "moderate" or "severe" decrease.
GLI-2017 reference values for DLCO are more suitable to our population and influence the diagnostic criteria and severity definition of several lung diseases.
肺一氧化碳单呼吸弥散量(DLCO)的解读需要将测量值与参考值进行比较。2017 年,全球肺功能倡议发布了新的 DLCO、肺泡容积(VA)和一氧化碳肺转移系数(KCO)的参考值(GLI-2017)。我们旨在通过将其与广泛使用的 1993 年欧洲煤钢共同体方程(ECSC-93)进行比较,评估 GLI-2017 参考值在大量人群中对 DLCO 的适用性。
在这项回顾性研究中,对成年人进行了肺量计指标、肺总量、DLCO、VA 和 KCO 的测量,分为 5 组(对照组、哮喘、慢性支气管炎、囊性纤维化和间质性肺疾病(ILD))。对两种方程组进行了按性别分层的统计学分析。
共纳入 4180 次检测。对照组(n=150)的 3 项 DLCO 指数的 GLI-2017 z 评分更接近 0(正常人群中的期望值),而 ECSC-93 z 评分则更接近-1.5。所有组别的男女混合,DLCO GLI-2017 z 评分和%预测值均明显高于 ECSC z 评分和%预测值。在ILD 组中,两种方程组之间的差异取决于 DLCO 损害的严重程度:在 DLCO 无或“轻度”下降的患者中,GLI-2017 z 评分高于 ECSC z 评分,但在“中度”或“重度”下降的患者中,GLI-2017 z 评分低于 ECSC z 评分。
GLI-2017 对 DLCO 的参考值更适合我们的人群,并影响了几种肺部疾病的诊断标准和严重程度定义。