Suppr超能文献

[一种用于评估尿失禁或生殖器脱垂手术患者性功能的新型自我调查问卷的验证(骨盆 - 会阴手术性功能问卷 - PPSSQ)]

[Validation of a new self-questionnaire to assess sexuality in patients operated on for urinary incontinence or genital prolapse (Pelvi-Perineal Surgery Sexuality Questionnaire - PPSSQ)].

作者信息

Fatton B, de Tayrac R, Cour F, Chevret-Measson M, Costa P, Berrogain N, Valancogne G, Alonso S, Hermieu J F

机构信息

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Carémeau, Nîmes, France.

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Carémeau, Nîmes, France.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 2021 Sep;31(11):671-682. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.12.013. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The main objective of this study was to validate a new questionnaire evaluating sexual health, in a population of sexually active women or not, who have surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse with or without mesh reinforcement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After the development of a first version of the questionnaire by members from the main French societies involved in the study of women's sexuality, a linguistic validation of the content of the questionnaire was carried out through semi-structured interviews. Then, a psychometric validation was carried out in a prospective multicenter cohort study. The questionnaire was evaluated in terms of acceptability, quality, dimensionality, internal consistency, temporal stability, sensitivity to changes and construction validity.

RESULTS

Linguistic validation was carried out in 25 patients. Psychometric validation was carried out in 297 women (291 with available data) operated on for urinary incontinence by midurethral sling (n=79) or for pelvic organ prolapse by the vaginal route with mesh (n=105), without mesh (n=22) or by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (n=85) between January 18, 2013 and January 18, 2016. Within the 288/291 women who had filed the question No. 1 allowing to know their sexual "status", 159 (55%) women were sexually active and 129 (45%) women were not sexually active before surgery. Within the 288 women, 165 had completed the questionnaire preoperatively and at 12 months and 111 had completed the questionnaire at 12 months and 12 months+1 week. The questionnaire was well accepted by the women and of good quality. All the questions were kept, but a change in the order and numbering of the questions had to be made. Two clinically relevant dimensions were identified in this analysis: a "sexual health" dimension comprising 5 questions and a "discomfort and pain" dimension comprising 3 questions. The overall questionnaire and both dimensions had good reliability and moderate to excellent temporal stability. A statistically significant association was demonstrated between question 15 and the improvement reported by PGI-I and the anatomical success rate on POP-Q classification. A strong correlation was found between the "sexual health" score and the total FSFI score.

CONCLUSION

The Pelvi-Perineal Surgery Sexuality Questionnaire (PPSSQ) is a 13-question self-questionnaire validated in a population of sexually active women or not, operated on for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopy or vaginal surgery, with or without mesh.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

引言

本研究的主要目的是验证一份评估性健康的新问卷,该问卷针对的人群为有或没有性活动的女性,她们因压力性尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂接受手术,手术方式包括有或没有网片加固的腹腔镜手术或阴道手术。

材料与方法

在参与女性性学研究的主要法国学会成员编制出问卷的第一版后,通过半结构化访谈对问卷内容进行了语言验证。然后,在一项前瞻性多中心队列研究中进行了心理测量学验证。从可接受性、质量、维度、内部一致性、时间稳定性、对变化的敏感性和结构效度等方面对问卷进行了评估。

结果

对25名患者进行了语言验证。在2013年1月18日至2016年1月18日期间,对297名接受手术的女性(291名有可用数据)进行了心理测量学验证,这些女性因压力性尿失禁接受经尿道中段吊带术(n = 79),或因盆腔器官脱垂接受阴道网片修补术(n = 105)、无网片修补术(n = 22)或腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术(n = 85)。在288/291名回答了第1个问题从而能够了解其性“状况”的女性中,159名(55%)女性术前有性活动,129名(45%)女性术前无性活动。在这288名女性中,165名在术前和术后12个月完成了问卷,111名在术后12个月和12个月 + 1周完成了问卷。该问卷被女性很好地接受且质量良好。所有问题均予以保留,但问题的顺序和编号需要调整。在该分析中确定了两个具有临床相关性的维度:一个由5个问题组成的“性健康”维度和一个由3个问题组成的“不适与疼痛”维度。整个问卷及其两个维度都具有良好的信度和中等至优秀的时间稳定性。第15个问题与PGI - I报告的改善情况以及POP - Q分类的解剖学成功率之间存在统计学上的显著关联。“性健康”得分与FSFI总分之间存在很强的相关性。

结论

盆腔 - 会阴手术性问卷(PPSSQ)是一份包含13个问题的自填式问卷,在有或没有性活动的女性人群中得到验证,这些女性因压力性尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂接受腹腔镜或阴道手术,手术方式包括有或没有网片。

证据级别

4级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验