• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证进食障碍样本中的内脏敏感性指数。

Validating the visceral sensitivity index in an eating disorder sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Long Island, New York, USA.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jun;54(6):986-994. doi: 10.1002/eat.23471. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1002/eat.23471
PMID:33448442
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Individuals with eating disorders (EDs) often have difficulty tolerating uncomfortable body sensations. As such, anxiety sensitivity specific to gastrointestinal (GI) sensations, has relevance for EDs. However, to date, no validated measures of this construct exist in EDs. Thus, the present study sought to validate the visceral sensitivity index (VSI), a 15-item measure originally validated in an irritable bowel syndrome sample, in an ED sample and explore associations with ED symptoms.

METHOD

Two hundred and sixty-six adolescents (n = 116) and adults (n = 150) in an ED partial hospital program completed the VSI and related measures at admission. Confirmatory factor analysis examined the factor structure of the VSI and hierarchical regression analyses explored associations between the VSI and ED symptoms.

RESULTS

The original version of the VSI had adequate model fit. An alternative 13-item model removing specific items with poor fit and less theoretical relevance to EDs also demonstrated good fit. The 15-item and 13-item VSI had strong internal consistency (α = .93-.94), and correlation results supported the convergent and divergent validity of both versions. Higher visceral sensitivity was associated with elevated body dissatisfaction, cognitive restraint, purging, restricting, and excessive exercise (p-values <.05), beyond length of illness, body mass index, and trait anxiety.

DISCUSSION

Results support the relevance of GI-specific anxiety in EDs and suggest that the original 15-item VSI and modified 13-item VSI have strong psychometric properties in an ED sample. Given comparable model fit and psychometric properties, both versions of the VSI may be used for future ED research.

摘要

目的

患有饮食失调症(ED)的个体通常难以忍受身体不适的感觉。因此,针对胃肠道(GI)感觉的焦虑敏感性与 ED 有关。但是,迄今为止,ED 中尚无该结构的验证措施。因此,本研究旨在验证内脏敏感性指数(VSI),这是一种最初在肠易激综合征样本中验证的 15 项测量方法,在 ED 样本中并探讨与 ED 症状的关联。

方法

在 ED 部分医院计划中,有 266 名青少年(n=116)和成年人(n=150)在入院时完成了 VSI 和相关测量。验证性因素分析检验了 VSI 的因子结构,分层回归分析探讨了 VSI 与 ED 症状之间的关联。

结果

VSI 的原始版本具有足够的模型拟合度。一种去除与 ED 相关性较差且理论相关性较弱的特定项目的替代 13 项模型也表现出良好的拟合度。15 项和 13 项 VSI 具有很强的内部一致性(α=0.93-0.94),相关结果支持两个版本的收敛和发散效度。较高的内脏敏感性与较高的身体不满、认知约束、呕吐、限制和过度运动(p 值<0.05)相关,超出了疾病的长度、体重指数和特质焦虑。

讨论

结果支持 GI 特异性焦虑在 ED 中的相关性,并表明原始的 15 项 VSI 和修改后的 13 项 VSI 在 ED 样本中具有很强的心理测量特性。鉴于可比的模型拟合度和心理测量特性,VSI 的两个版本都可以用于未来的 ED 研究。

相似文献

1
Validating the visceral sensitivity index in an eating disorder sample.验证进食障碍样本中的内脏敏感性指数。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jun;54(6):986-994. doi: 10.1002/eat.23471. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Gastrointestinal-Specific symptom anxiety in patients with gastroparesis: Relationships to symptom severity and quality of life.胃轻瘫患者胃肠道特异性症状焦虑:与症状严重程度和生活质量的关系。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 May;35(5):e14534. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14534. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
3
The central role of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety in irritable bowel syndrome: further validation of the visceral sensitivity index.胃肠道特异性焦虑在肠易激综合征中的核心作用:内脏敏感性指数的进一步验证
Psychosom Med. 2007 Jan;69(1):89-98. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31802e2f24.
4
Further validation of the visceral sensitivity index: Psychometric properties and utility for predicting disordered eating in a diverse university sample.内脏敏感性指数的进一步验证:在多样化的大学样本中预测饮食失调的心理测量特性和效用。
Eat Behav. 2024 Dec;55:101920. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101920. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
5
Validation of child-adapted short scales for measuring gastrointestinal-specific avoidance and anxiety.验证用于测量胃肠道特异性回避和焦虑的儿童适应短量表。
Acta Paediatr. 2022 Aug;111(8):1621-1627. doi: 10.1111/apa.16403. Epub 2022 May 27.
6
The visceral sensitivity index: A novel tool for measuring GI-symptom-specific anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease.内脏敏感性指数:一种用于测量炎症性肠病中胃肠症状特异性焦虑的新工具。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Sep;34(9):e14384. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14384. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Gastrointestinal specific anxiety in irritable bowel syndrome: validation of the Japanese version of the visceral sensitivity index for university students.肠易激综合征的胃肠道特异性焦虑:大学生内脏敏感性指数日本版的验证。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2014 Mar 21;8(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-8-10.
8
Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15): Factor structure, psychometric properties, and clinical validation.进食障碍-15 项量表(ED-15):因子结构、心理测量学特性和临床验证。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2019 Nov;27(6):682-691. doi: 10.1002/erv.2694. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
9
Factor structure and psychometric properties of a multicultural Spanish-language version of the Eating Disorder-15 in a nonclinical sample of Chilean women.智利女性非临床样本中多文化西班牙语版饮食失调症-15量表的因子结构和心理测量特性
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Apr;56(4):727-735. doi: 10.1002/eat.23860. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
10
Gender norms, psychometric properties, and validity for the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory.性别规范、心理计量特性和 Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory 的有效性。
Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Jan;47(1):85-91. doi: 10.1002/eat.22180. Epub 2013 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Hungarian Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI-H): insights from two cross-sectional studies on self-reported IBS and gluten-related conditions.匈牙利内脏敏感性指数(VSI-H)的心理测量特性:两项关于自我报告的肠易激综合征和麸质相关疾病的横断面研究的见解
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02918-3.
2
The relevance of cardiac and gastric interoception for disordered eating behavior.心脏和胃部内感受对饮食失调行为的相关性。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01284-0.
3
Eating Pathology and Interoceptive Sensibility Using the Brief Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2: Can There be Too Much of a Good Thing?
使用内感受觉知简短多维评估量表-2评估饮食病理学与内感受敏感性:好事是否会过犹不及?
J Pers Assess. 2025 Jan 9:1-13. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2445706.
4
VISCERAL SENSITIVITY INDEX (VSI-IT): Italian Adaptation and Validation.内脏敏感性指数(VSI-IT):意大利语改编与验证
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jul 5;14(7):1953-1968. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14070130.
5
Perceptual Dysfunction in Eating Disorders.饮食失调中的感知功能障碍。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024 May 11. doi: 10.1007/7854_2024_470.
6
Validation of a measure of hypervigilance and anxiety about gastrointestinal symptoms for individuals with elevated eating pathology.验证一种针对有进食障碍个体的过度警觉和胃肠道症状焦虑的测量工具。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Jan;36(1):41-52. doi: 10.1037/pas0001280. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
Preliminary data that psychological treatment and baseline anxiety are associated with a decrease in postprandial fullness and early satiation for individuals with bulimia nervosa and related other specified feeding or eating disorder.初步数据表明,对于患有贪食症和相关其他特定进食或饮食障碍的个体,心理治疗和基线焦虑与餐后饱腹感和早期饱感的减少有关。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Dec;56(12):2343-2348. doi: 10.1002/eat.24068. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
8
Comparing the effect of internet-delivered short-term progressive muscle relaxation and psychoeducation on mindful ability, visceral hypersensitivity and symptoms of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.比较网络提供的短期渐进性肌肉松弛和心理教育对肠易激综合征患者正念能力、内脏高敏感性及症状的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jul 29;12:259. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1734_22. eCollection 2023.
9
Gastrointestinal-Specific symptom anxiety in patients with gastroparesis: Relationships to symptom severity and quality of life.胃轻瘫患者胃肠道特异性症状焦虑:与症状严重程度和生活质量的关系。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 May;35(5):e14534. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14534. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
10
Diet, Digestion, and the Dietitian: A Survey of Clinicians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices to Advance the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Disturbances in Individuals with Anorexia Nervosa.饮食、消化与营养师:对临床医生关于改善神经性厌食症患者胃肠道紊乱治疗的知识、态度和实践的调查
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 30;11(19):5833. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195833.