• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾者对随机对照试验中知情同意的理解。

Caregivers' Understanding of Informed Consent in a Randomized Control Trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand.

Stratford Dental, 82 Miranda Street, Taranaki, Stratford District, 4332, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10085-w. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11673-020-10085-w
PMID:33449316
Abstract

There are differences in caregivers' literacy and health literacy levels that may affect their ability to consent to children participating in clinical research trials. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness, and caregivers' understandings, of the process of informed consent that accompanied their child's participation in a dental randomized control trial (RCT). Telephone interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of ten caregivers who each had a child participating in the RCT. Pre-tested closed and open-ended questions were used, and the findings were produced from an inductive analysis of the latter and a descriptive analysis of the former. Participants had limited understanding of the purpose of the RCT and rated the readability of the consent form more highly than they rated their understanding of the research. All felt that informed consent was vital, but some caregivers had not read the consent documents. Some caregivers enrolled their child in the RCT because they trusted the researchers, and the majority wanted to improve dental care for children. The informed consent process was not always effective despite high readability of the informed consent documents. Researchers must consider the health literacy of the study group, and actively engaging with caregivers to achieve meaningful informed consent may be challenging. Future research could explore participants' perspectives of informed consent in populations with low health literacy and assess whether an underlying expectation not to comprehend health-related information may be a barrier to informed consent.

摘要

看护人在读写能力和健康素养方面存在差异,这可能会影响他们同意孩子参与临床研究试验的能力。本研究旨在探索伴随儿童参与牙科随机对照试验(RCT)的知情同意过程对其的有效性,以及看护人的理解。通过方便抽样,对参与 RCT 的每一位儿童的十名看护人进行了电话访谈。使用了预先测试的封闭式和开放式问题,研究结果来自对后者的归纳分析和对前者的描述性分析。参与者对 RCT 的目的只有有限的了解,并对知情同意书的可读性评价高于对研究的理解程度。所有人都认为知情同意至关重要,但一些看护人并未阅读同意书。一些看护人让孩子参与 RCT 是因为他们信任研究人员,而且大多数人希望改善儿童的牙科护理。尽管知情同意文件的可读性很高,但知情同意过程并非总是有效。研究人员必须考虑研究对象的健康素养,并且积极与看护人接触以实现有意义的知情同意可能具有挑战性。未来的研究可以探索健康素养较低人群对知情同意的看法,并评估对不理解与健康相关信息的潜在期望是否会成为知情同意的障碍。

相似文献

1
Caregivers' Understanding of Informed Consent in a Randomized Control Trial.照顾者对随机对照试验中知情同意的理解。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10085-w. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.志愿者参与的研究的参与者理解:系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Nov;46(6):423-31. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12097. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
3
Trends of Informed Consent forms for industry-sponsored clinical trials in rheumatology over a 17-year period: Readability, and assessment of patients' health literacy and perceptions.17 年间风湿病学领域产业资助临床试验知情同意书的趋势:可读性,以及对患者健康素养和认知的评估。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Dec;48(3):547-552. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
4
How to achieve informed consent for research from Spanish-speaking individuals with low literacy: a qualitative report.如何从低识字率的西班牙语个体中获得研究的知情同意:定性报告。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:172-82. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499990.
5
Should consent forms used in clinical trials be translated into the local dialects? A survey among past participants in rural Ghana.临床试验中使用的同意书是否应翻译成当地方言?加纳农村地区过往参与者的一项调查。
Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):234-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774515609290. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
An Analysis of Informed Consent Form Readability of Oncology Research Protocols.肿瘤学研究方案知情同意书可读性分析
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):363-367. doi: 10.1177/1556264618795057. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
7
Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗试验知情同意书的长度与可读性评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843.
8
Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Form for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials: Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1205 Study.血液和骨髓移植临床试验网络 1205 研究:易于阅读的造血细胞移植临床试验知情同意书结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Oct;24(10):2145-2151. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.研究知情同意书:一项评估可读性及实现改变的可操作性的研究。
J Investig Med. 1995 Oct;43(5):459-67.
10
Simplification improves understanding of informed consent information in clinical trials regardless of health literacy level.简化能够增进对临床试验中知情同意信息的理解,无论健康素养水平如何。
Clin Trials. 2015 Jun;12(3):232-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774515571139. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral health of children in Aotearoa New Zealand-time for change.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦儿童的口腔健康——是时候做出改变了。
J R Soc N Z. 2022 May 18;52(4):335-356. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2069826. eCollection 2022.
2
The Shifts in Human Consciousness.人类意识的转变。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10102-6. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Informed consent process: A step further towards making it meaningful!知情同意过程:向使其具有意义更进一步!
Perspect Clin Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):107-112. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_147_16.
2
The Hall Technique and conventional restorative treatment in New Zealand children's primary oral health care - clinical outcomes at two years.新西兰儿童初级口腔保健中的 Hall 技术与常规修复治疗 - 两年临床结果。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):180-188. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12324. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
3
Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy.
方法学综述:健康素养方面随机对照试验的质量
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 11;16:246. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1479-2.
4
Health literacy predicts participant understanding of orally-presented informed consent information.健康素养可预测参与者对口头提供的知情同意信息的理解。
Clin Res Trials. 2015;1(1):15-19. doi: 10.15761/CRT.1000105. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
5
Challenges, benefits, and factors to enhance recruitment and inclusion of children in pediatric dental research.儿科牙科研究中促进儿童招募与纳入的挑战、益处及因素
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Sep;25(5):310-6. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12176. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
6
Obtaining informed consent in an illiterate population.在文盲群体中获取知情同意书。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2013 Jan;5(1):37-40.
7
Acceptability of different caries management methods for primary molars in a RCT.一项随机对照试验中不同乳牙龋病管理方法的可接受性
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Jan;25(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12097. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
Mothers' perceptions of their child's enrollment in a randomized clinical trial: poor understanding, vulnerability and contradictory feelings.母亲对其子女参加随机临床试验的看法:理解不足、脆弱和矛盾心理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Dec 10;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-52.
9
Informed consent in clinical research: Revisiting few concepts and areas.临床研究中的知情同意:重新审视一些概念和领域。
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Jan;4(1):26-32. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.106373.
10
Improving the informed consent process--a booklet on participants' rights in medical research.改进知情同意程序——一本关于医学研究中参与者权利的手册。
N Z Med J. 2012 Sep 21;125(1362):36-46.