Weintraub Jane A, Breland Carol E
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Sep;25(5):310-6. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12176. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
Historically, children have been excluded from clinical research. Many drugs and procedures have not been tested on children. The International Conference on Harmonization and the Food and Drug Administration guidance now stress that children should be included in research unless there is a reason for exclusion. Compared to adults, recruitment of children at different life stages requires different considerations.
To review published studies and gray literature to identify pediatric recruitment strategies and develop recommendations.
There is limited clinical research literature available to recommend recruitment strategies and methods for pediatric trials. Formal guidelines for reporting recruitment activities in publications are scant. Recommendations are made based on current practices regarding protocol design, obtaining consent and engaging child, parent and caregiver in research.
A scientific approach is needed to determine the best design for recruitment of pediatric clinical studies. Investigators should report and publish recruitment and retention strategies that facilitate this important aspect of the research process to increase transparency, efficiency, and identification of the most effective methods for dental researchers.
从历史上看,儿童一直被排除在临床研究之外。许多药物和程序尚未在儿童身上进行测试。国际协调会议和美国食品药品监督管理局的指南现在强调,除非有排除的理由,否则儿童应纳入研究。与成年人相比,在不同生命阶段招募儿童需要不同的考虑因素。
回顾已发表的研究和灰色文献,以确定儿科招募策略并提出建议。
可用于推荐儿科试验招募策略和方法的临床研究文献有限。出版物中关于报告招募活动的正式指南很少。根据当前关于方案设计、获得同意以及让儿童、家长和照顾者参与研究的实践提出建议。
需要一种科学方法来确定儿科临床研究招募的最佳设计。研究人员应报告并发表有助于研究过程这一重要方面的招募和保留策略,以提高透明度、效率,并为牙科研究人员确定最有效的方法。