• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病房中俯卧位通气治疗新冠肺炎患者:一项回顾性研究。

Prone position in wards for spontaneous breathing Covid-19 patients: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Institute for Integrative Cell Biology, Microbiology: Endotoxins, Structures and Host Response, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Nov;190(4):1519-1522. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02479-x. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-020-02479-x
PMID:33449332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7809237/
Abstract

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) caused a large number of non-ventilated hypoxemic patients to require the use of prone position. The aim of this study is to measure the efficiency and tolerance of prone positioning in ward hypoxemic patients treated for Covid-19. This retrospective study included confirmed Covid-19 hypoxemic patients treated by at least one prone position session. Primary outcome was pulse oximetry over inspired oxygen fraction ratio (SpO/FiO) before, during, and after prone position. Secondary outcomes were failure, adverse events, and poor tolerance rate. Twenty-seven patients were included. During first, second and third sessions, SpO/FiO ratio was significantly higher during posture than before (p < 0.0001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 respectively). Eighteen patients were responders (defined as an improvement of SpO/FiO of more than 50) during the first posture and have a shorter length of hospital stay than non-responder patients. Failure rate was 5%, and poor tolerance and adverse events rates were 8% and 7% respectively. Our study found that prone position in wards improved alveolar exchange during posture and is well tolerated. This technique could be used in any medical ward.

摘要

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致大量非通气性低氧血症患者需要采用俯卧位。本研究旨在测量 COVID-19 低氧血症患者在病房中接受俯卧位治疗的效果和耐受性。这项回顾性研究纳入了至少接受过一次俯卧位治疗的确诊 COVID-19 低氧血症患者。主要结局是测量俯卧位前后患者的脉搏血氧饱和度/吸氧分数(SpO/FiO)。次要结局包括失败率、不良事件和较差的耐受率。共纳入 27 例患者。在第一次、第二次和第三次治疗中,患者的 SpO/FiO 比值在体位时均显著高于体位前(p<0.0001、p<0.01 和 p<0.001)。18 例患者(定义为 SpO/FiO 比值改善超过 50%)在第一次接受俯卧位治疗时为应答者,其住院时间短于无应答者。失败率为 5%,较差的耐受率和不良事件发生率分别为 8%和 7%。本研究发现,病房中的俯卧位可改善体位时的肺泡交换,且患者耐受性良好。这种技术可以在任何医疗病房中使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca90/7809237/abd50668f255/11845_2020_2479_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca90/7809237/abd50668f255/11845_2020_2479_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca90/7809237/abd50668f255/11845_2020_2479_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prone position in wards for spontaneous breathing Covid-19 patients: a retrospective study.病房中俯卧位通气治疗新冠肺炎患者:一项回顾性研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Nov;190(4):1519-1522. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02479-x. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis.俯卧位通气在非插管急性低氧性呼吸衰竭和 ARDS 患者中的疗效和耐受性:一项荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;15:17534666211009407. doi: 10.1177/17534666211009407.
3
Prone Positioning of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Are Nonintubated in Hypoxic Respiratory Distress: Single-Site Retrospective Health Records Review.COVID-19 患者俯卧位通气治疗:单中心回顾性病历研究
J Emerg Nurs. 2021 Mar;47(2):279-287.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
4
Prone positioning for patients intubated for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19: a retrospective observational cohort study.COVID-19 继发严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者行气管插管后俯卧位治疗:一项回顾性观察性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
5
Response of patients with acute respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 to awake-prone position outside the intensive care unit based on pulmonary involvement.基于肺部受累情况,对 COVID-19 所致急性呼吸衰竭患者在重症监护病房外采取清醒俯卧位治疗的反应。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Dec 10;76:e3368. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3368. eCollection 2021.
6
Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019.俯卧位通气在严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征合并 2019 冠状病毒病机械通气患者中的应用。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Mar;65(3):360-363. doi: 10.1111/aas.13741. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
7
[Clinical study of awake prone positioning treatment in patients with common coronavirus disease 2019 caused by Omicron variant].[奥密克戎变异株所致新型冠状病毒肺炎2019患者清醒俯卧位治疗的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jun;34(6):576-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220418-00384.
8
Prolonged Active Prone Positioning in Spontaneously Breathing Non-intubated Patients With COVID-19-Associated Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure With PaO/FiO >150.对于新冠病毒相关低氧性急性呼吸衰竭且动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度比值>150的自主呼吸非插管患者,采用延长的主动俯卧位通气。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 21;8:626321. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.626321. eCollection 2021.
9
Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients.COVID-19 机械通气患者的俯卧位:一项超过 1000 例患者的多中心研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Apr 6;25(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03552-2.
10
Optimal timing for awake prone positioning in Covid-19 patients: Insights from an observational study from two centers.新冠病毒患者清醒俯卧位的最佳时机:来自两个中心的观察性研究的见解。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Apr;152:104707. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104707. Epub 2024 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prone position versus usual care in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients in medical wards: a randomised controlled trial.俯卧位与常规治疗在低氧血症 COVID-19 患者中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 17;27(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04529-z.
2
Does awake prone positioning prevent the use of mechanical respiratory support or death in COVID-19 patients on standard oxygen therapy hospitalised in general wards? A multicentre randomised controlled trial: the PROVID-19 protocol.清醒俯卧位是否能预防因 COVID-19 而在普通病房接受标准氧疗的住院患者需要使用机械通气支持或死亡?一项多中心随机对照试验:PROVID-19 方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e060320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060320.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study.COVID-19 所致急性呼吸衰竭未插管患者俯卧位通气的可行性和生理影响(PRON-COVID):一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):765-774. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30268-X. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
Awake prone positioning for non-intubated oxygen dependent COVID-19 pneumonia patients.清醒俯卧位通气用于非插管氧依赖型 COVID-19 肺炎患者。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 23;56(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01198-2020. Print 2020 Jul.
3
Respiratory Parameters in Patients With COVID-19 After Using Noninvasive Ventilation in the Prone Position Outside the Intensive Care Unit.
Effect of prone versus supine position in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
COVID-19 患者俯卧位与仰卧位的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Nov;74:110406. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110406. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
COVID-19 患者在 ICU 外俯卧位使用无创通气后的呼吸参数。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2338-2340. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7861.
4
Use of Prone Positioning in Nonintubated Patients With COVID-19 and Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure.COVID-19 合并低氧性急性呼吸衰竭患者俯卧位通气的应用。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2336-2338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8255.
5
Estimation of COVID-19 prevalence in Italy, Spain, and France.估算意大利、西班牙和法国的 COVID-19 流行率。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 10;729:138817. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138817. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Early Self-Proning in Awake, Non-intubated Patients in the Emergency Department: A Single ED's Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic.急诊科清醒、非插管患者早期自主翻身:COVID-19 大流行期间单一急诊科的经验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 May;27(5):375-378. doi: 10.1111/acem.13994.
7
Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS.急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中血氧饱和度/吸入氧浓度比值与动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度比值的比较。
Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):410-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0617. Epub 2007 Jun 15.