• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

讲真话誓言能提高众包工作中的诚信吗?

Do truth-telling oaths improve honesty in crowd-working?

机构信息

Paris School of Economics and Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, CES, Paris, France.

Department of Economics, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0244958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244958. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0244958
PMID:33449931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7810327/
Abstract

This study explores whether an oath to honesty can reduce both shirking and lying among crowd-sourced internet workers. Using a classic coin-flip experiment, we first confirm that a substantial majority of Mechanical Turk workers both shirk and lie when reporting the number of heads flipped. We then demonstrate that lying can be reduced by first asking each worker to swear voluntarily on his or her honor to tell the truth in subsequent economic decisions. Even in this online, purely anonymous environment, the oath significantly reduced the percent of subjects telling "big" lies (by roughly 27%), but did not affect shirking. We also explore whether a truth-telling oath can be used as a screening device if implemented after decisions have been made. Conditional on flipping response, MTurk shirkers and workers who lied were significantly less likely to agree to an ex-post honesty oath. Our results suggest oaths may help elicit more truthful behavior, even in online crowd-sourced environments.

摘要

本研究探讨了宣誓诚实是否可以减少众包互联网工作者的逃避责任和撒谎行为。我们使用经典的抛硬币实验,首先证实大多数 Mechanical Turk 工人在报告抛硬币出现正面的次数时都会逃避责任和撒谎。然后我们证明,通过首先要求每个工人自愿宣誓以诚信为本,在后续的经济决策中说实话,可以减少撒谎行为。即使在这种纯匿名的在线环境中,宣誓也显著降低了说“大”谎的受试者比例(约 27%),但并没有影响逃避责任。我们还探讨了如果在决策后实施,是否可以使用如实宣誓作为筛选工具。在翻转响应的条件下,MTurk 逃避责任者和撒谎者不太可能同意事后诚实宣誓。我们的结果表明,宣誓可能有助于引出更真实的行为,即使是在在线众包环境中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c5/7810327/027c744a23b9/pone.0244958.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c5/7810327/7dbbd5a44d28/pone.0244958.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c5/7810327/a07eac43d944/pone.0244958.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c5/7810327/027c744a23b9/pone.0244958.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c5/7810327/7dbbd5a44d28/pone.0244958.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c5/7810327/a07eac43d944/pone.0244958.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c5/7810327/027c744a23b9/pone.0244958.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Do truth-telling oaths improve honesty in crowd-working?讲真话誓言能提高众包工作中的诚信吗?
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0244958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244958. eCollection 2021.
2
Learning through observing: Effects of modeling truth- and lie-telling on children's honesty.通过观察学习:榜样诚实和说谎对儿童诚实的影响。
Dev Sci. 2020 Jan;23(1):e12883. doi: 10.1111/desc.12883. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
3
Eliciting preferences for truth-telling in a survey of politicians.在对政治家的调查中引出关于说实话的偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):22002-22008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008144117. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
4
Promising to tell the truth makes 8- to 16-year-olds more honest.承诺说实话会使 8 到 16 岁的孩子更诚实。
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):801-11. doi: 10.1002/bsl.960. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
5
Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?说谎:无法抑制的真相?
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060713. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
The effects of punishment and appeals for honesty on children's truth-telling behavior.惩罚及倡导诚实对儿童说实话行为的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
7
Let the man choose what to do: Neural correlates of spontaneous lying and truth-telling.让受试者选择做什么:自发说谎与说实话的神经关联。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Feb;102:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie.性别和个性特征会影响说实话或说谎所需时间的差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Oct;97(2):451-60. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.451.
9
From little white lies to filthy liars: the evolution of honesty and deception in young children.从善意的谎言到满口谎言的骗子:幼儿时期诚实和欺骗的演变。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2011;40:139-79. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386491-8.00004-9.
10
Can We Commit Future Managers to Honesty?我们能让未来的管理者保持诚实吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:701627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701627. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of ex ante honesty oaths in reducing dishonesty depends on content.事前诚实宣誓在减少不诚实行为方面的有效性取决于其内容。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jan;9(1):169-187. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02009-0. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Commitment to honesty oaths decreases dishonesty, but commitment to another individual does not affect dishonesty.对诚实誓言的承诺会减少不诚实行为,但对他人的承诺不会影响不诚实行为。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Oct 24;1(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00028-7.
3
Promises on the go: A field study on keeping one's word.随时随地的承诺:一项关于信守诺言的实地研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples.异质处理效应估计在样本间的可推广性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):12441-12446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808083115. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
2
Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.?Mechanical Turk 工人样本是否能代表美国的健康状况和健康行为?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0198835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198835. eCollection 2018.
3
Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:1097239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1097239. eCollection 2023.
4
Correction: Do truth-telling oaths improve honesty in crowd-working?更正:说实话誓言能提高众包工作中的诚实度吗?
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0253997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253997. eCollection 2021.
5
Can We Commit Future Managers to Honesty?我们能让未来的管理者保持诚实吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:701627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701627. eCollection 2021.
6
Shelter-in-place orders, loneliness, and collaborative behavior.就地避难令、孤独感和合作行为。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 Dec;43:101056. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101056. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
The impact of public health messaging and personal experience on the acceptance of mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间公共卫生信息和个人经历对口罩佩戴接受度的影响。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Jul;187:415-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 May 11.
用于组织研究的亚马逊土耳其机器人的系统视角:综述与建议
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 8;8:1359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01359. eCollection 2017.
4
The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions.在网络上进行实验的陷阱:无人关注的选择性损耗如何导致令人惊讶(但错误)的研究结论。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Oct;111(4):493-504. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000056. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
6
Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers.亚马逊土耳其机器人工人的天真:对行为研究人员的后果和解决方案。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):112-30. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7.
7
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.评估亚马逊土耳其机器人作为实验行为研究工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Economic games on the internet: the effect of $1 stakes.网络经济博弈:1 美元赌注的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031461. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
9
Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments.基于网络的网络公共物品实验中的合作与传染。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 11;6(3):e16836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016836.
10
A test of a model for commitment.一项承诺模型的测试。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Mar;3(3):349-53. doi: 10.1037/h0022943.