Munakata Y, McClelland J L, Johnson M H, Siegler R S
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Psychol Rev. 1997 Oct;104(4):686-713. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.4.686.
Infants seem sensitive to hidden objects in habituation tasks at 3.5 months but fail to retrieve hidden objects until 8 months. The authors first consider principle-based accounts of these successes and failures, in which early successes imply knowledge of principles and failures are attributed to ancillary deficits. One account is that infants younger than 8 months have the object permanence principle but lack means-ends abilities. To test this, 7-month-olds were trained on means-ends behaviors and were tested on retrieval of visible and occluded toys. Means-ends demands were the same, yet infants made more toy-guided retrievals in the visible case. The authors offer an adaptive process account in which knowledge is graded and embedded in specific behavioral processes. Simulation models that learn gradually to represent occluded objects show how this approach can account for success and failure in object permanence tasks without assuming principles and ancillary deficits.
婴儿在3.5个月大时的习惯化任务中似乎对隐藏物体敏感,但直到8个月大时才会去寻找隐藏物体。作者首先考虑基于原则的对这些成功与失败的解释,其中早期的成功意味着对原则的了解,而失败则归因于辅助性缺陷。一种解释是,8个月以下的婴儿具有客体永久性原则,但缺乏手段-目的能力。为了验证这一点,对7个月大的婴儿进行了手段-目的行为训练,并对他们寻找可见和被遮挡玩具的能力进行了测试。手段-目的要求相同,但婴儿在可见情况下进行了更多由玩具引导的寻找行为。作者提出了一种适应性过程解释,即知识是分级的,并嵌入到特定的行为过程中。逐渐学习表征被遮挡物体的模拟模型展示了这种方法如何能够解释客体永久性任务中的成功与失败,而无需假设原则和辅助性缺陷。