• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can infants be "taught" to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events.能否“教会”婴儿关注事件类别中的一个新物理变量?以覆盖事件中的高度为例。
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Jun;56(4):284-326. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.003. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
2
Regularity detection and explanation-based learning jointly support learning about physical events in early infancy.规律性检测和基于解释的学习共同支持婴儿早期对物理事件的学习。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Sep;113:101219. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Infants' physical knowledge affects their change detection.婴儿的物理知识会影响他们的变化检测。
Dev Sci. 2006 Mar;9(2):173-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00477.x.
4
Explanation-based learning in infancy.婴儿期的基于解释的学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1511-1526. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1334-4.
5
Detecting continuity violations in infancy: a new account and new evidence from covering and tube events.检测婴儿期的连续性违背:来自覆盖和管道事件的新解释与新证据。
Cognition. 2005 Mar;95(2):129-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.11.001.
6
Perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task in 6.5-month-old infants.6.5个月大婴儿在违背预期任务中的持续性反应。
Cognition. 2003 Jul;88(3):277-316. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00044-1.
7
Visual experience enhances infants' use of task-relevant information in an action task.视觉体验能增强婴儿在一项动作任务中对与任务相关信息的运用。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1513-22. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1513.
8
When the ordinary seems unexpected: evidence for incremental physical knowledge in young infants.当平凡变得出乎意料:幼儿逐步积累物理知识的证据。
Cognition. 2005 Apr;95(3):297-328. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.010. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
9
Infants' reasoning about hidden objects: evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations.婴儿对隐藏物体的推理:事件通用和事件特定期望的证据。
Dev Sci. 2004 Sep;7(4):391-414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00357.x.
10
How do the object-file and physical-reasoning systems interact? Evidence from priming effects with object arrays or novel labels.目标文件系统和物理推理系统如何相互作用?来自对象数组或新标签启动效应的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Mar;125:101368. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101368. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Infants can use temporary or scant categorical information to individuate objects.婴儿可以使用临时的或有限的类别信息来区分物体。
Cogn Psychol. 2024 Mar;149:101640. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101640. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
How do the object-file and physical-reasoning systems interact? Evidence from priming effects with object arrays or novel labels.目标文件系统和物理推理系统如何相互作用?来自对象数组或新标签启动效应的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Mar;125:101368. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101368. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
The origins of higher-order thinking lie in children's spontaneous talk across the pre-school years.高阶思维的起源在于儿童在学前阶段自发的对话。
Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104274. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104274. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions.婴儿期灾难性个体化失败:一种新模型及预测。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;126(2):196-225. doi: 10.1037/rev0000136. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Explanation-based learning in infancy.婴儿期的基于解释的学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1511-1526. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1334-4.
6
Perceptual learning and face processing in infancy.婴儿期的知觉学习与面部加工
Dev Psychobiol. 2016 Nov;58(7):829-840. doi: 10.1002/dev.21420.
7
Functional Activation in the Ventral Object Processing Pathway during the First Year.第一年期间腹侧物体加工通路中的功能激活
Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 Jan 5;9:180. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00180. eCollection 2015.
8
Infants' grip strength predicts mu rhythm attenuation during observation of lifting actions with weighted blocks.婴儿的握力可预测在观察使用加重积木的举升动作时的μ节律衰减。
Dev Sci. 2016 Mar;19(2):195-207. doi: 10.1111/desc.12308. Epub 2015 May 1.
9
Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy: An Integrative Account.婴儿期的客体个体化与物理推理:一种综合解释
Lang Learn Dev. 2012 Jan;8(1):4-46. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2012.630610. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10
Innate Ideas Revisited: For a Principle of Persistence in Infants' Physical Reasoning.重温天赋观念:为婴儿物理推理中的坚持原则。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):2-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00056.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting Transparent Barriers: Clear Evidence Against the Means-End Deficit Account of Search Failures.检测透明屏障:反对搜索失败的手段-目的缺陷解释的明确证据。
Infancy. 2001 Jul;2(3):395-404. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0203_7. Epub 2001 Jul 1.
2
Should all stationary objects move when hit? Developments in infants' causal and statistical expectations about collision events.所有静止的物体被撞击时都应该移动吗?婴儿对碰撞事件的因果和统计预期的发展。
Infant Behav Dev. 2003 Dec;26(4):529-567. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.08.002.
3
Innate Ideas Revisited: For a Principle of Persistence in Infants' Physical Reasoning.重温天赋观念:为婴儿物理推理中的坚持原则。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):2-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00056.x.
4
Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects.幼儿对涉及无生命和自行推进物体的物理事件的推理。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Jun;58(4):441-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.11.001. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
Visual experience enhances infants' use of task-relevant information in an action task.视觉体验能增强婴儿在一项动作任务中对与任务相关信息的运用。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1513-22. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1513.
6
Young infants' actions reveal their developing knowledge of support variables: converging evidence for violation-of-expectation findings.幼儿的行为揭示了他们对支撑变量的逐渐发展的认知:对违背预期结果的研究的汇聚性证据。
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):304-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
7
Learning about occlusion: initial assumptions and rapid adjustments.了解咬合:初始假设与快速调整。
Cognition. 2007 Oct;105(1):26-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
8
Interrupting infants' persisting object representations: an object-based limit?干扰婴儿持续的客体表征:基于客体的限制?
Dev Sci. 2006 Sep;9(5):F50-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00521.x.
9
Infants' physical knowledge affects their change detection.婴儿的物理知识会影响他们的变化检测。
Dev Sci. 2006 Mar;9(2):173-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00477.x.
10
Inducing infants to detect a physical violation in a single trial.诱导婴儿在单次试验中检测出身体违规行为。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jul;16(7):542-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01572.x.

能否“教会”婴儿关注事件类别中的一个新物理变量?以覆盖事件中的高度为例。

Can infants be "taught" to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events.

作者信息

Wang Su-hua, Baillargeon Renée

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2008 Jun;56(4):284-326. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.003. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.003
PMID:18177635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3346696/
Abstract

As they observe or produce events, infants identify variables that help them predict outcomes in each category of events. How do infants identify a new variable? An explanation-based learning (EBL) account suggests three essential steps: (1) observing contrastive outcomes relevant to the variable; (2) discovering the conditions associated with these outcomes; and (3) generating an explanation for the condition-outcome regularity discovered. In Experiments 1-3, 9-month-old infants watched events designed to "teach" them the variable height in covering events. After watching these events, designed in accord with the EBL account, the infants detected a height violation in a covering event, three months earlier than they ordinarily would have. In Experiments 4-6, the "teaching" events were modified to remove one of the EBL steps, and the infants no longer detected the height violation. The present findings thus support the EBL account and help specify the processes by which infants acquire their physical knowledge.

摘要

当婴儿观察或产生事件时,他们会识别有助于预测各类事件结果的变量。婴儿如何识别一个新变量呢?基于解释的学习(EBL)理论提出了三个基本步骤:(1)观察与该变量相关的对比性结果;(2)发现与这些结果相关的条件;(3)为所发现的条件-结果规律生成一种解释。在实验1-3中,9个月大的婴儿观看了旨在“教导”他们关于覆盖事件中高度变量的事件。在观看了根据EBL理论设计的这些事件后,婴儿在一个覆盖事件中察觉到了高度违规,比他们通常察觉到的时间早了三个月。在实验4-6中,“教导”事件被修改以去除EBL的一个步骤,婴儿就不再察觉到高度违规了。因此,目前的研究结果支持了EBL理论,并有助于明确婴儿获取物理知识的过程。