Prehospital Emergency Care Service (SAMU 67), Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Centre for Training and Research in Health Sciences Education (CFRPS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;16(7):1967-1974. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02629-0. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased staffing needs in emergency departments. The question quickly arose as to whether it was appropriate to offer medical students the opportunity to assist this staff. The dilemma stems in part from the potential impact on their psychological well-being as well as their academic and clinical performances. We sought to determine the level of anxiety of medical students during the COVID-19 outbreak, and whether it was higher among the students who chose to return to the clinical setting, especially in first-line units (i.e., emergency departments and resuscitation units). In May 2020, 1180/1502 (78.5%) undergraduate medical students at Strasbourg Medical School (France) completed a questionnaire assessing their anxiety and clinical experience. A 2018 cohort of undergraduate medical students served as the baseline. The 2020 COVID cohort had higher rates of anxiety than the 2018 cohort. This difference was specifically observed in the students who chose not to return to the clinical setting during the crisis (N = 684, 59%). At linear regression, the main factors associated with anxiety were gender (p < 0.005) and perceived clinical activity personal conditions (p < 0.001). Employment site, including COVID first-line units, was not correlated with anxiety. Working in the clinical setting during the COVID-19 outbreak is not a risk factor for anxiety in medical students. Instead, it is an active coping strategy, suggesting that there are no barriers to allowing students to return to clinical settings during a pandemic, including first-line units, in terms of their psychological well-being.
新冠疫情大流行导致急诊科人员配置需求增加。随之而来的问题是,是否应该为医学生提供协助医护人员的机会。这种困境部分源于学生的心理健康以及学习和临床表现可能受到的潜在影响。我们旨在确定新冠疫情期间医学生的焦虑程度,以及选择返回临床环境(特别是一线科室,即急诊科和复苏室)的学生的焦虑程度是否更高。2020 年 5 月,斯特拉斯堡医学院(法国)的 1180/1502 名(78.5%)本科医学生完成了一份评估焦虑和临床经验的问卷。2018 年入学的医学生为基线组。2020 年新冠疫情组的焦虑率高于 2018 年组。这种差异在选择在危机期间不返回临床环境的学生中更为明显(N=684,59%)。在线性回归中,与焦虑相关的主要因素是性别(p<0.005)和感知的临床活动个人情况(p<0.001)。就业地点,包括新冠一线科室,与焦虑无关。在新冠疫情期间在临床环境中工作不是医学生焦虑的危险因素。相反,这是一种积极的应对策略,这表明在大流行期间,允许学生返回临床环境(包括一线科室)不会对他们的心理健康造成障碍。