• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退耕还林工程后影响参与者土地复垦意愿因素的多层次分析

Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants' land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program.

作者信息

Wu Xutong, Wang Shuai, Fu Bojie

机构信息

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, People's Republic of China.

State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 2871, Beijing, 100085, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ambio. 2021 Jul;50(7):1394-1403. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01475-w. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-020-01475-w
PMID:33454912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8116479/
Abstract

Understanding the postprogram land use plans of participants is necessary for the sustainability of the conservation achievements from payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs. Previous studies have analyzed many individual factors affecting participants' reconversion plans after PES programs. However, whether the regional ecosystem services changes caused by PES programs affect reconversion willingness remains elusive. Here, we used the multilevel linear model to determine the effects of regional ecosystem services changes and individual characteristics on participants' land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program (GFGP) in the Yanhe watershed of the Loess Plateau. We found that household income, ecological awareness, and employment changes negatively affected reconversion willingness, while nonfarm employment positively affected it at the individual level. At the regional level, the grain production and water yield changes could influence the reconversion willingness of respondents with different individual characteristics. With improved understanding of the factors affecting reconversion willingness, several suggestions to improve the sustainability of the GFGP were proposed. Our study provides a template for analyzing the multilevel factors that affect the sustainability of other PES programs.

摘要

了解参与者的项目后土地使用计划对于生态系统服务付费(PES)项目保护成果的可持续性至关重要。以往研究分析了许多影响PES项目参与者重新转换计划的个体因素。然而,PES项目导致的区域生态系统服务变化是否会影响重新转换意愿仍不明确。在此,我们使用多层次线性模型来确定黄土高原延河流域实施退耕还林项目(GFGP)后,区域生态系统服务变化和个体特征对参与者土地重新转换意愿的影响。我们发现,家庭收入、生态意识和就业变化对重新转换意愿有负面影响,而非农就业在个体层面上对其有正面影响。在区域层面,粮食产量和产水量变化会影响具有不同个体特征受访者的重新转换意愿。随着对影响重新转换意愿因素的深入理解,我们提出了一些提高退耕还林项目可持续性的建议。我们的研究为分析影响其他PES项目可持续性的多层次因素提供了一个模板。

相似文献

1
Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants' land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program.退耕还林工程后影响参与者土地复垦意愿因素的多层次分析
Ambio. 2021 Jul;50(7):1394-1403. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01475-w. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Spatiotemporal pattern of the trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services after Grain for Green Program: a case study of the Loess Plateau, China.退耕还林工程后生态系统服务权衡与协同的时空格局:以黄土高原为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(24):30020-30033. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09060-0. Epub 2020 May 23.
3
Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.运用社会心理学模型分析生态环境脆弱地区生态服务付费项目中农民的生态保护行为。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.152. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China.中国滇西北地区退耕还林工程对生态系统服务的影响存在显著权衡。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.026. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
5
Households' preferences for hydrological services in Veracruz, Mexico: The importance of outcomes vs. program design.墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州家庭对水文服务的偏好:结果与项目设计的重要性。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 15;300:113763. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113763. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
6
Rural Household Preferences for Active Participation in "Payment for Ecosystem Service" Programs: A Case in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China.农村家庭积极参与“生态系统服务付费”项目的偏好:以中国密云水库集水区为例
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169483. eCollection 2017.
7
Quantifying the Impact of Grain for Green Program on Ecosystem Service Management: A Case Study of Exibei Region, China.量化“退耕还林”工程对生态系统服务管理的影响:以中国陕北地区为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 29;16(13):2311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132311.
8
Towards sustainable integrated watershed ecosystem management: a case study in Dingxi on the loess plateau, China.迈向可持续的综合流域生态系统管理:以中国黄土高原定西为例。
Environ Manage. 2013 Jan;51(1):126-37. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9807-0. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
9
Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.利用具有成本效益的目标定位来提高生态系统服务付费中保护投资的效率。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Dec;24(6):1469-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01551.x.
10
Quantifying the Impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on Ecosystem Health in the Typical Agro-Pastoral Ecotone: A Case Study in the Xilin Gol League, Inner Mongolia.量化退耕还林工程对农牧交错带典型生态系统健康的影响——以内蒙古锡林郭勒盟为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 5;17(16):5631. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165631.

本文引用的文献

1
Resilience building of rural livelihoods in PES programmes: A case study in China's Loess Hills.农村生计的韧性建设在 PES 项目中:来自中国黄土丘陵区的案例研究。
Ambio. 2020 Apr;49(4):962-985. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01236-4. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Socio-ecological changes on the Loess Plateau of China after Grain to Green Program.中国黄土高原实施退耕还林(草)工程后的社会生态变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 15;678:565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 May 5.
3
Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa's protected area network.东非保护区网络中生物多样性和生态系统服务的表现。
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):245-257. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01155-4. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
4
Global land change from 1982 to 2016.全球 1982 年至 2016 年土地变化情况。
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7720):639-643. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
China's response to a national land-system sustainability emergency.中国应对国家土地系统可持续性危机的举措。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):193-204. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
6
Revealing pathways from payments for ecosystem services to socioeconomic outcomes.揭示从生态系统服务付费到社会经济成果的路径。
Sci Adv. 2018 Mar 21;4(3):eaao6652. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6652. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital.投资自然资本可提高生态系统服务。
Science. 2016 Jun 17;352(6292):1455-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2295. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.运用社会心理学模型分析生态环境脆弱地区生态服务付费项目中农民的生态保护行为。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.152. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.土地利用对本地陆地生物多样性的全球影响。
Nature. 2015 Apr 2;520(7545):45-50. doi: 10.1038/nature14324.
10
Farmers value on-farm ecosystem services as important, but what are the impediments to participation in PES schemes?农民认为农场生态系统服务具有重要价值,但参与生态效益补偿计划的障碍是什么?
Sci Total Environ. 2015 May 15;515-516:12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Feb 14.