• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素提高了人们将基因检测结果告知家人的可能性?

What improves the likelihood of people receiving genetic test results communicating to their families about genetic risk?

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Department of Behavioral Science, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):726-731. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.001
PMID:33455827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8005444/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We currently rely on probands to communicate genetic testing results and health risks within a family to stimulate preventive behaviors, such as cascade testing. Rates of guidelines-based cascade testing are low, possibly due to low frequency or non-urgent communication of risk among family members. Understanding what is being communicated and why may help improve interventions that increase communication and rates of cascade testing.

METHODS

Participants (n = 189) who were to receive both positive and negative colorectal cancer (CRC) sequencing results completed surveys on family communication, family functioning, impact of cancer in the family, and future communication of risk and were participants in eMERGE3. Questions were taken from existing surveys and administered electronically using email and a web driven tool.

RESULTS

Common family member targets of CRC risk communication, before results were received, were mothers and fathers, then sisters and grandchildren and finally, children and brothers. A communication impact score of 0.66 (sd = 0.83) indicated low-to-moderate communication impact. Age and education were significantly associated with frequency of familial communication, but not on the cancer-related impact of familial communication.

CONCLUSIONS

There is infrequent communication about cancer risk from probands to family members.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These results demonstrate an opportunity to help families improve communication.

摘要

目的

我们目前依赖于先证者来在家庭内传达基因检测结果和健康风险,以刺激预防措施,如级联检测。基于指南的级联检测率较低,可能是由于家庭成员之间的风险沟通频率较低或不紧急。了解正在沟通的内容和原因可能有助于改进沟通和提高级联检测率的干预措施。

方法

将收到结直肠癌(CRC)测序阳性和阴性结果的参与者(n=189)完成了关于家庭沟通、家庭功能、癌症对家庭的影响以及未来风险沟通的调查,他们均为 eMERGE3 的参与者。问题取自现有的调查,并通过电子邮件和网络驱动工具进行电子管理。

结果

在收到结果之前,CRC 风险沟通的常见家庭成员目标是母亲和父亲,然后是姐妹和孙子孙女,最后是孩子和兄弟。沟通影响得分为 0.66(标准差=0.83),表明沟通影响低至中度。年龄和教育与家庭沟通的频率显著相关,但与家庭沟通的癌症相关影响无关。

结论

先证者与家庭成员之间很少有关于癌症风险的沟通。

实践意义

这些结果表明有机会帮助家庭改善沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8183/8005444/84b58a353d95/nihms-1664065-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8183/8005444/84b58a353d95/nihms-1664065-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8183/8005444/84b58a353d95/nihms-1664065-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
What improves the likelihood of people receiving genetic test results communicating to their families about genetic risk?哪些因素提高了人们将基因检测结果告知家人的可能性?
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):726-731. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Web-Based Tool (FH Family Share) to Increase Uptake of Cascade Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Development and Evaluation.基于网络的工具(FH家族共享)以提高家族性高胆固醇血症级联检测的接受度:开发与评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 15;9(1):e32568. doi: 10.2196/32568.
3
Female family members lack understanding of indeterminate negative BRCA1/2 test results shared by probands.女性家庭成员对先证者所分享的BRCA1/2基因检测结果不确定为阴性缺乏理解。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Oct;28(5):950-961. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1147. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
4
A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning.一项关于遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因检测与家庭功能的交流的社会网络分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Apr;12(4):304-13.
5
Family communication, genetic testing and colonoscopy screening in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer: a qualitative study.家族沟通、基因检测和结肠镜筛查在遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌中的应用:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2009 Nov;18(11):1208-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.1487.
6
Using a Tailored Digital Health Intervention for Family Communication and Cascade Genetic Testing in Swiss and Korean Families With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Protocol for the DIALOGUE Study.在瑞士和韩国遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌家庭中使用定制数字健康干预进行家庭沟通和级联基因检测:DIALOGUE研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 11;10(6):e26264. doi: 10.2196/26264.
7
Communicating genetic test results within the family: Is it lost in translation? A survey of relatives in the randomized six-step study.在家族内部传达基因检测结果:是否在翻译中丢失了信息?一项针对随机六步研究中亲属的调查。
Fam Cancer. 2016 Oct;15(4):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9889-1.
8
From Probands to Relatives: Communication of Genetic Risk for Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer and Its Influence on Subsequent Testing.从先证者到亲属:遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌遗传风险的告知及其对后续检测的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(1):E91-E98. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000876.
9
Family communication matters: the impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results.家庭沟通很重要:告知亲属未分类变异体和无信息 DNA 检测结果的影响。
Genet Med. 2011 Apr;13(4):333-41. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318204cfed.
10
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:诊断策略及其影响。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May(150):1-180.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies.遗传咨询中的家庭沟通问题:过程研究的范围综述
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70067. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70067.
2
Family Communication of Genetic Risk: What is it and Why does it Matter?遗传风险的家庭沟通:是什么以及为何重要?
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jun 30;59(8):7-15. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9721. eCollection 2025.
3
Prospective changes in primary care patients' family communication after skin cancer genetic test offer.皮肤癌基因检测提供后,初级保健患者家庭沟通的前瞻性变化。
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 7;7:100409. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100409. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM).支持患者将遗传检测结果与高危亲属分享的干预措施:无荟萃分析的综合研究(SWiM)。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Sep;31(9):988-1002. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01400-1. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
5
Measuring quality and value in genetic counseling: The current landscape and future directions.衡量遗传咨询的质量和价值:当前现状与未来方向。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):315-324. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1657. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
The Communication Chain of Genetic Risk: Analyses of Narrative Data Exploring Proband-Provider and Proband-Family Communication in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.遗传风险的传播链条:对叙述性数据的分析,探索遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中先证者与医疗服务提供者以及先证者与家族之间的沟通情况
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 29;12(8):1249. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081249.
7
A qualitative study of unaffected ATM and CHEK2 carriers: How participants make meaning of 'moderate risk' genetic results in a population breast cancer screening trial.一项针对无影响 ATM 和 CHEK2 携带者的定性研究:参与者如何在人群乳腺癌筛查试验中对“中度风险”遗传结果赋予意义。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Dec;31(6):1421-1433. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1617. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
8
A systematic review of theory-informed strategies used in interventions fostering family genetic risk communication.系统综述:理论指导策略在促进家庭遗传风险沟通干预中的应用
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):1953-1962. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital.为大型医院的妇科肿瘤患者构建个性化医疗基础设施。
J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 21;12(1):3. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010003.
10
Improving our model of cascade testing for hereditary cancer risk by leveraging patient peer support: a concept report.通过利用患者同伴支持来改进我们的遗传性癌症风险级联检测模型:概念报告。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 26;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00198-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of genomic secondary findings among 21,915 eMERGE network participants.eMERGE 网络 21915 名参与者中的基因组二级发现频率。
Genet Med. 2020 Sep;22(9):1470-1477. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0810-9. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Harmonizing Clinical Sequencing and Interpretation for the eMERGE III Network.协调 eMERGE III 网络的临床测序和解读。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Sep 5;105(3):588-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
3
Patient goals, motivations, and attitudes in a patient-driven variant reclassification study.患者驱动的变异重新分类研究中的患者目标、动机和态度。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):558-569. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1052. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
"It would be so much easier": health system-led genetic risk notification-feasibility and acceptability of cascade screening in an integrated system.“这将容易得多”:卫生系统主导的遗传风险告知——综合系统中级联筛查的可行性与可接受性
J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00412-z. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
5
Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.家庭交流的发展:一项支持沟通和教育家庭结直肠癌风险的干预措施。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):470-478. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1484-3.
6
Genetic counseling and cascade genetic testing in Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征的遗传咨询与级联基因检测
Fam Cancer. 2016 Jul;15(3):423-7. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9893-5.
7
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.向研究参与者的亲属反馈基因组结果:分析与建议。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
8
Effects of web-based intervention on risk reduction behaviors in melanoma survivors.基于网络的干预对黑色素瘤幸存者风险降低行为的影响。
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Jun;9(2):279-86. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0412-0. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
9
The KinFact intervention - a randomized controlled trial to increase family communication about cancer history.亲属因素干预——一项旨在增加家庭关于癌症病史沟通的随机对照试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;23(10):806-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4754.
10
A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征诊断策略的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(58):1-406. doi: 10.3310/hta18580.