• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.家庭交流的发展:一项支持沟通和教育家庭结直肠癌风险的干预措施。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):470-478. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1484-3.
2
Cancer screening behaviors and risk perceptions among family members of colorectal cancer patients with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency.患有不明原因错配修复缺陷的结直肠癌患者家庭成员的癌症筛查行为和风险认知。
Fam Cancer. 2017 Apr;16(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9947-8.
3
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
4
The Effect of a Health Education Intervention on Jordanian Participants' Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Health Perceptions, and Screening Practices.健康教育干预对约旦参与者的结直肠癌知识、健康认知及筛查行为的影响
Cancer Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;41(3):226-237. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000480.
5
Factors affecting colonoscopy screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: A mixed-method systematic review.影响结直肠癌患者一级亲属结肠镜筛查的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Jun;21(3):245-252. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12689. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys.从 7845 份前瞻性收集的调查中观察到初级保健环境中结直肠癌筛查检测选择的变化。
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Sep;23(9):1541-8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0031-x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
7
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Family communication, genetic testing and colonoscopy screening in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer: a qualitative study.家族沟通、基因检测和结肠镜筛查在遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌中的应用:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2009 Nov;18(11):1208-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.1487.
9
Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.确定参与患者导航干预的不依从非裔美国参与者进行结肠镜筛查的障碍。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Aug;40(4):449-57. doi: 10.1177/1090198112459514. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
10
Factors Influencing Adherence to Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: Experiences and Behaviors of Colorectal Cancer Survivors.影响结直肠癌推荐监测依从性的因素:结直肠癌幸存者的经历与行为
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Oct;34(5):938-949. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1398-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Cultural and Age-Specific Preferences to Develop a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention for CHamorus and Filipinos in Guam-Findings from a Qualitative Study.探索文化和特定年龄偏好,为关岛查莫罗人和菲律宾人开发基于社区的结直肠癌筛查干预措施——一项定性研究的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 9;22(5):746. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050746.
2
Applying the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions to increase family communication about hereditary cancer.应用开发和评估复杂干预措施的框架,以增进家庭关于遗传性癌症的沟通。
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 4;2:100133. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100133. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
The Impact of Proband Indication for Genetic Testing on the Uptake of Cascade Testing Among Relatives.先证者基因检测指征对亲属级联检测接受度的影响。
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 16;13:867226. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867226. eCollection 2022.
4
Using a Tailored Digital Health Intervention for Family Communication and Cascade Genetic Testing in Swiss and Korean Families With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Protocol for the DIALOGUE Study.在瑞士和韩国遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌家庭中使用定制数字健康干预进行家庭沟通和级联基因检测:DIALOGUE研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 11;10(6):e26264. doi: 10.2196/26264.
5
Interventions Facilitating Family Communication of Genetic Testing Results and Cascade Screening in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.促进遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌或林奇综合征基因检测结果的家庭沟通及级联筛查的干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 23;13(4):925. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040925.
6
What improves the likelihood of people receiving genetic test results communicating to their families about genetic risk?哪些因素提高了人们将基因检测结果告知家人的可能性?
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):726-731. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
7
Psychosocial problems in women attending French, German and Spanish genetics clinics before and after targeted or multigene testing results: an observational prospective study.法国、德国和西班牙遗传诊所中接受靶向或多基因检测前后女性的心理社会问题:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e029926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029926.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized trial of a web-based survivor intervention on melanoma prevention behaviors of first-degree relatives.基于网络的幸存者干预对一级亲属黑色素瘤预防行为影响的随机试验。
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Mar;30(3):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1096-y. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
All in the family? Communication of cancer survivors with their families.都在家庭范围内?癌症幸存者与其家人之间的沟通。
Fam Cancer. 2017 Oct;16(4):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-9987-8.
4
Communication Among Melanoma Family Members.黑色素瘤家族成员之间的交流。
J Health Commun. 2017 Mar;22(3):198-204. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1259374. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
5
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.结直肠癌统计数据,2017 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
7
Efficacy of a Telehealth Intervention on Colonoscopy Uptake When Cost Is a Barrier: The Family CARE Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.当费用成为障碍时远程医疗干预对结肠镜检查接受率的影响:家庭CARE整群随机对照试验
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Sep;24(9):1311-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0150. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
8
Religiosity, spirituality, and HIV risk behaviors among African American women from four rural counties in the southeastern U.S.美国东南部四个农村县非裔美国女性的宗教信仰、精神信仰与艾滋病病毒风险行为
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Feb;26(1):168-81. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0005.
9
Understanding disparity: researchers strive to recruit more African Americans and other minorities to studies.理解差异:研究人员努力招募更多非裔美国人和其他少数族裔参与研究。
Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;121(3):325-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29247.
10
Effects of web-based intervention on risk reduction behaviors in melanoma survivors.基于网络的干预对黑色素瘤幸存者风险降低行为的影响。
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Jun;9(2):279-86. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0412-0. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

家庭交流的发展:一项支持沟通和教育家庭结直肠癌风险的干预措施。

Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):470-478. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1484-3.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-019-1484-3
PMID:30737640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6688969/
Abstract

IFamily members of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) may be at increased risk of developing the disease. However, the majority of CRC can be prevented through colonoscopy screening and family members may not be aware if they are recommended to pursue earlier screening because of their family history of CRC. As such, tools must be developed to effectively communicate potential changes to the recommended age for colonoscopy screening and other important CRC-related information to family members. We modified and adapted a successful intervention for families with melanoma to be appropriate for families with CRC to increase communication and screening in family members. The multistep process included the following: (1) developing a paper version of the intervention, (2) piloting the paper version among families with CRC, (3) developing the web-based version, and (4) testing the intervention for usability. Qualitative data was collected and analyzed for pilot testing. Usability testing utilized both qualitative and quantitative data. Patients with CRC liked the paper version and had multiple suggestions, including adding a better introduction, sections on genetics and family history, and clearer communication assistance. The web-based tool was well received and improved upon the linear book format with links, better section instructions, and more proactive communication tools for families. These processes produced materials that satisfied individuals from various families with assistance and support for communicating about CRC. Evaluating the effects of the tools in rigorous research projects is the next step.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)患者的家庭成员可能面临更高的患病风险。然而,通过结肠镜筛查可以预防大多数 CRC,并且由于家族 CRC 病史,家庭成员可能不知道他们是否被建议更早地进行筛查。因此,必须开发工具来有效地向家庭成员传达结肠镜筛查推荐年龄和其他重要 CRC 相关信息的潜在变化。我们对黑色素瘤家族的成功干预措施进行了修改和调整,使其适用于 CRC 家族,以增加家庭成员之间的沟通和筛查。多步骤过程包括以下步骤:(1)开发干预措施的纸质版本,(2)在 CRC 家庭中试用纸质版本,(3)开发基于网络的版本,以及(4)测试干预措施的可用性。收集并分析试点测试的定性数据。可用性测试同时使用定性和定量数据。CRC 患者喜欢纸质版本,并提出了多个建议,包括添加更好的介绍、遗传和家族史部分,以及更清晰的沟通辅助。基于网络的工具也受到了欢迎,并通过链接、更好的章节说明以及更主动的家庭沟通工具改进了线性书籍格式。这些流程生成了满足各种家庭需求的材料,并为 CRC 沟通提供了帮助和支持。下一步是在严格的研究项目中评估这些工具的效果。