• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的家长评定问卷评估学龄前儿童神经发育障碍的信度:横断面社区研究

Interformat Reliability of Web-Based Parent-Rated Questionnaires for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Preschoolers: Cross-sectional Community Study.

作者信息

Tanaka Masanori, Saito Manabu, Takahashi Michio, Adachi Masaki, Nakamura Kazuhiko

机构信息

Faculty of Business Administration, Hokkai-Gakuen University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.

出版信息

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021 Feb 4;4(1):e20172. doi: 10.2196/20172.

DOI:10.2196/20172
PMID:33455899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8078684/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection and intervention for neurodevelopmental disorders are effective. Several types of paper questionnaires have been developed to assess these conditions in early childhood; however, the psychometric equivalence between the web-based and the paper versions of these questionnaires is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the interformat reliability of the web-based parent-rated version of the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ), and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) among Japanese preschoolers in a community developmental health check-up setting.

METHODS

A set of paper-based questionnaires were distributed for voluntary completion to parents of children aged 5 years. The package of the paper format questionnaires included the ASSQ, ADHD-RS, DCDQ, parent-reported SDQ (P-SDQ), and several additional demographic questions. Responses were received from 508 parents of children who agreed to participate in the study. After 3 months, 300 parents, who were among the initial responders, were randomly selected and asked to complete the web-based versions of these questionnaires. A total of 140 parents replied to the web-based format and were included as a final sample in this study.

RESULTS

We obtained the McDonald ω coefficients for both the web-based and paper formats of the ASSQ (web-based: ω=.90; paper: ω=.86), ADHD-RS total and subscales (web-based: ω=.88-.94; paper: ω=.87-.93), DCDQ total and subscales (web-based: ω=.82-.94; paper: ω=.74-.92), and P-SDQ total and subscales (web-based: ω=.55-.81; paper: ω=.52-.80). The intraclass correlation coefficients between the web-based and paper formats were all significant at the 99.9% confidence level: ASSQ (r=0.66, P<.001); ADHD-RS total and subscales (r=0.66-0.74, P<.001); DCDQ total and subscales (r=0.66-0.71, P<.001); P-SDQ Total Difficulties and subscales (r=0.55-0.73, P<.001). There were no significant differences between the web-based and paper formats for total mean score of the ASSQ (P=.76), total (P=.12) and subscale (P=.11-.47) mean scores of DCDQ, and the P-SDQ Total Difficulties mean score (P=.20) and mean subscale scores (P=.28-.79). Although significant differences were found between the web-based and paper formats for mean ADHD-RS scores (total: t=2.83, P=.005; Inattention subscale: t=2.15, P=.03; Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale: t=3.21, P=.002), the effect sizes were small (Cohen d=0.18-0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the web-based versions of the ASSQ, ADHD-RS, DCDQ, and P-SDQ were equivalent, with the same level of internal consistency and intrarater reliability as the paper versions, indicating the applicability of the web-based versions of these questionnaires for assessing neurodevelopmental disorders.

摘要

背景

对神经发育障碍进行早期检测和干预是有效的。已经开发了几种纸质问卷来评估幼儿期的这些情况;然而,这些问卷的网络版和纸质版之间的心理测量等效性尚不清楚。

目的

本研究在社区发育健康检查环境中,检验了日本学龄前儿童中基于网络的家长评定版自闭症谱系筛查问卷(ASSQ)、注意力缺陷/多动障碍评定量表(ADHD-RS)、2007年发育协调障碍问卷(DCDQ)和长处与困难问卷(SDQ)的不同格式间信度。

方法

向5岁儿童的家长发放一套纸质问卷以供自愿填写。纸质问卷包包括ASSQ、ADHD-RS、DCDQ、家长报告的SDQ(P-SDQ)以及一些额外的人口统计学问题。收到了508名同意参与研究的儿童家长的回复。3个月后,从最初的回复者中随机选择300名家长,要求他们完成这些问卷的网络版。共有140名家长回复了网络版问卷,并被纳入本研究的最终样本。

结果

我们获得了ASSQ网络版和纸质版的麦克唐纳ω系数(网络版:ω = 0.90;纸质版:ω = 0.86),ADHD-RS总分及各分量表(网络版:ω = 0.88 - 0.94;纸质版:ω = 0.87 - 0.93),DCDQ总分及各分量表(网络版:ω = 0.82 - 0.94;纸质版:ω = 0.74 - 0.92),以及P-SDQ总分及各分量表(网络版:ω = 0.55 - 0.81;纸质版:ω = 0.52 - 0.80)。网络版和纸质版之间的组内相关系数在99.9%置信水平上均显著:ASSQ(r = 0.66,P <.);ADHD-RS总分及各分量表(r = 0.66 - 0.74,P <.);DCDQ总分及各分量表(r = 0.66 - 0.71,P <.);P-SDQ总困难及各分量表(r = 0.55 - 0.73,P <.)。ASSQ总分均值(P = 0.76)、DCDQ总分(P = 0.12)及分量表均值(P = 0.11 - 0.47)、P-SDQ总困难均值(P = 0.20)及分量表均值(P = 0.28 - 0.79)在网络版和纸质版之间无显著差异。虽然在ADHD-RS均值得分上网络版和纸质版之间存在显著差异(总分:t = 2.83,P =);注意力不集中分量表:t = 2.15,P =);多动/冲动分量表:t = 3.21,P =),但效应量较小(科恩d = 0.18 - 0.22)。

结论

这些结果表明,ASSQ、ADHD-RS、DCDQ和P-SDQ的网络版具有等效性,与纸质版具有相同水平的内部一致性和评分者信度,表明这些问卷的网络版适用于评估神经发育障碍。

相似文献

1
Interformat Reliability of Web-Based Parent-Rated Questionnaires for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Preschoolers: Cross-sectional Community Study.基于网络的家长评定问卷评估学龄前儿童神经发育障碍的信度:横断面社区研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021 Feb 4;4(1):e20172. doi: 10.2196/20172.
2
Evaluation of the Japanese version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening tool for clumsiness of Japanese children.发展性协调障碍问卷日本版作为日本儿童笨拙筛查工具的评估。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
3
Psychopathological screening of children with ADHD: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a pan-European study.多动症儿童的心理病理学筛查:泛欧洲研究中的长处与困难问卷
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1:I56-62. doi: 10.1007/s00787-006-1008-7.
4
Psychometric properties of the Japanese ADHD-RS in preschool children.日本版注意力缺陷多动障碍评定量表(ADHD-RS)在学龄前儿童中的心理测量特性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;55:268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 17.
5
The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a predictor of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.作为家长报告的自闭症谱系障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍诊断预测指标的长处与困难问卷。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 3;8(12):e80247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080247. eCollection 2013.
6
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Preschoolers: The Accuracy of a Short Screener.注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)在学龄前儿童中的表现:一种简短筛查工具的准确性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;57(6):428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
7
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Validity and reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in 5-6 year olds: differences by gender or by parental education?5-6 岁儿童长处和困难问卷的有效性和可靠性:性别或父母教育程度的差异?
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036805. Epub 2012 May 18.
9
Motor characteristics in children with developmental coordination disorder and attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder: intergroup comparison and predictors.发育性协调障碍和注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童的运动特征:组间比较及预测因素
Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2022 Sep 23. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.22.06885-9.
10
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.荷兰版《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)- 家长用 2-18 岁儿童版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 14;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0948-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Current Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of the Neglected Methodology of Web-Based Questionnaires Among Chinese Health Workers: Web-Based Questionnaire Study.中文健康工作者对被忽视的网络问卷方法的当前知识、态度和实践:基于网络的问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 27;25:e41591. doi: 10.2196/41591.

本文引用的文献

1
How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic.由于新冠疫情,精神卫生保健应如何改变。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):813-824. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30307-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Prevalence and cumulative incidence of autism spectrum disorders and the patterns of co-occurring neurodevelopmental disorders in a total population sample of 5-year-old children.5 岁儿童全人群样本中自闭症谱系障碍的患病率和累积发病率,以及共患神经发育障碍的模式。
Mol Autism. 2020 May 14;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00342-5.
3
International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder.国际临床实践建议:发育性协调障碍的定义、诊断、评估、干预和心理社会方面。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Mar;61(3):242-285. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14132. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
Adaptation of the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ) to preschool children.自闭症谱系筛查问卷(ASSQ)在学龄前儿童中的适应。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0199590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199590. eCollection 2018.
5
Measurement agreement of the self-administered questionnaire of the Belgian Health Interview Survey: Paper-and-pencil versus web-based mode.比利时健康访谈调查自我管理问卷的测量一致性:纸质版与网络版。
PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0197434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197434. eCollection 2018.
6
Efficacy of early interventions for infants and young children with, and at risk for, autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍患儿和有患病风险的婴幼儿早期干预的疗效。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;30(1):25-39. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1432574. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
7
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Autism spectrum disorder: outcomes in adulthood.自闭症谱系障碍:成年后的结果。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;30(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000308.
9
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Psychometric properties of the Japanese ADHD-RS in preschool children.日本版注意力缺陷多动障碍评定量表(ADHD-RS)在学龄前儿童中的心理测量特性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;55:268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 17.