Rheumatology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Leon, Castilla y León, Spain
Pharmacy, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Leon, Spain.
RMD Open. 2021 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001439.
The recent outbreak of COVID-19 has raised concerns in the rheumatology community about the management of immunosuppressed patients diagnosed with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. It is not clear whether the use of biological agents may suppose a risk or protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, it has been suggested that severe respiratory forms of COVID-19 occur as a result of exacerbated inflammation status and cytokine production. This prompted the use of interleukin 6 (IL-6) (tocilizumab and sarilumab) and IL-1 inhibitors (anakinra) in severe COVID-19 disease and more recently JAK1/2 inhibitor (baricitinib). Therefore, patients with rheumatic diseases provide a great opportunity to learn about the use of biological agents as protective drugs against SARS-CoV-2.
To estimate COVID-19 infection rate in patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) for inflammatory rheumatic diseases (RMD), determine the influence of biological agents treatment as risk or protective factors and study the prognosis of patients with rheumatic diseases receiving biological agents compared to the general population in a third-level hospital setting in León, Spain.
We performed a retrospective observational study including patients seen at our rheumatology department who received bDMARDs for rheumatic diseases between December 1st 2019 and December 1st 2020, and analysed COVID-19 infection rate. All patients who attended our rheumatology outpatient clinic with diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease receiving treatment with biological agents were included. Main variable was the hospital admission related to COVID-19. The covariates were age, sex, comorbidities, biological agent, duration of treatment, mean dose of glucocorticoids and need for intensive care unit . We performed an univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to assess risk factors of COVID-19 infection.
There were a total of 4464 patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation. 40 patients out of a total of 820 patients with rheumatic diseases (4.8%) receiving bDMARDs contracted COVID-19 and 4 required hospital care. Crude incidence rate of COVID-19 requiring hospital care among the general population was 3.6%, and it was 0.89% among the group with underlying rheumatic diseases. 90% of patients receiving bDMARDS with COVID-19 did not require hospitalisation. Out of the 4464 patients, 869 patients died, 2 of which received treatment with biological agents. Patients with rheumatic diseases who tested positive for COVID-19 were older (female: median age 60.8 IQR 46-74; male: median age 61.9 IQR 52-70.3) than those who were negative for COVID-19 (female: median age 58.3 IQR 48-69; male: median age 56.2 IQR 47-66), more likely to have hypertension (45% vs 26%, OR 2.25 (CI 1.18-4.27),p 0.02), cardiovascular disease (23 % vs 9.6%, OR 2.73 (1.25-5.95), p 0.02), be smokers (13% vs 4.6%, OR 2.95 (CI 1.09-7.98), p 0.04), receiving treatment with rituximab (20% vs 8%, 2.28 (CI 1.24-6.32), p 0.02) and a higher dose of glucocorticoids (OR 2.5 (1.3-10.33, p 0.02) and were less likely to be receiving treatment with IL-6 inhibitors (2.5% vs 14%, OR 0.16, (CI 0.10-0.97, p 0.03). When exploring the effect of the rest of the therapies between groups (affected patients vs unaffected), we found no significant differences in bDMARD proportions. IL-1 inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors and belimumab-treated patients showed the lowest incidence of COVID-19 among adult patients with rheumatic diseases. We found no differences in sex or rheumatological disease between patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and patients who tested negative.
Overall, the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) does not associate with severe manifestations of COVID-19. Patients with rheumatic disease diagnosed with COVID-19 were more likely to be receiving a higher dose of glucocorticoids and treatment with rituximab. IL-6 inhibitors may have a protective effect.
最近 COVID-19 的爆发引起了风湿病学领域对诊断为炎症性风湿病的免疫抑制患者管理的关注。目前尚不清楚生物制剂的使用是否可能对 SARS-CoV-2 感染构成风险或保护;然而,已经提出严重的 COVID-19 呼吸道形式是由于炎症状态和细胞因子产生加剧而发生的。这促使在严重 COVID-19 疾病中使用白细胞介素 6(IL-6)(托珠单抗和沙利鲁单抗)和 IL-1 抑制剂(阿那白滞素),并且最近使用 JAK1/2 抑制剂(巴瑞替尼)。因此,患有风湿病的患者为了解生物制剂作为对抗 SARS-CoV-2 的保护性药物提供了很好的机会。
评估炎症性风湿病患者(RMD)接受生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)治疗的 COVID-19 感染率,确定生物制剂治疗作为风险或保护因素的影响,并研究与西班牙莱昂三级医院一般人群相比,接受生物制剂治疗的风湿病患者的预后。
我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,包括 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 1 日期间在我们风湿病科接受 bDMARDs 治疗的患有风湿病的患者,并分析了 COVID-19 感染率。所有在我们风湿病门诊就诊并接受生物制剂治疗的炎症性风湿病患者均被纳入研究。主要变量是与 COVID-19 相关的住院治疗。协变量为年龄、性别、合并症、生物制剂、治疗持续时间、糖皮质激素的平均剂量和需要重症监护病房。我们进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型来评估 COVID-19 感染的危险因素。
共有 4464 名需要住院治疗的 COVID-19 患者。820 名患有风湿性疾病的患者中有 40 名(4.8%)接受 bDMARDs 治疗的患者感染了 COVID-19,其中 4 名需要住院治疗。一般人群中 COVID-19 需要住院治疗的发病率为 3.6%,而患有基础风湿性疾病的人群为 0.89%。90%接受 bDMARDs 治疗的 COVID-19 患者无需住院治疗。在 4464 名患者中,有 869 名患者死亡,其中 2 名接受了生物制剂治疗。COVID-19 检测呈阳性的风湿性疾病患者比 COVID-19 检测呈阴性的患者年龄更大(女性:中位数年龄 60.8 IQR 46-74;男性:中位数年龄 61.9 IQR 52-70.3)(女性:中位数年龄 58.3 IQR 48-69;男性:中位数年龄 56.2 IQR 47-66),更有可能患有高血压(45% 比 26%,OR 2.25(CI 1.18-4.27),p 0.02)、心血管疾病(23%比 9.6%,OR 2.73(1.25-5.95),p 0.02)、吸烟(13%比 4.6%,OR 2.95(CI 1.09-7.98),p 0.04)、接受利妥昔单抗治疗(20%比 8%,2.28(CI 1.24-6.32),p 0.02)和更高剂量的糖皮质激素(OR 2.5(1.3-10.33),p 0.02),并且更不可能接受白细胞介素 6 抑制剂治疗(2.5%比 14%,OR 0.16(CI 0.10-0.97),p 0.03)。在探索两组之间(受影响患者与未受影响患者)其余治疗的效果时,我们发现 bDMARD 的比例没有显著差异。白细胞介素 1 抑制剂、白细胞介素 6 抑制剂、JAK 抑制剂和贝利木单抗治疗的成年风湿病患者 COVID-19 的发病率最低。我们在 COVID-19 检测呈阳性的患者和检测呈阴性的患者之间没有发现性别或风湿病之间的差异。
总体而言,生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)的使用与 COVID-19 的严重表现无关。诊断为 COVID-19 的风湿病患者更有可能接受更高剂量的糖皮质激素和利妥昔单抗治疗。白细胞介素 6 抑制剂可能具有保护作用。