• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safe implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中安全实施术后加速康复方案
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020 Sep 23;34(1):5-10. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1810198.
2
Safety and efficacy of minimalist approach in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular interventioN-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中极简方法的安全性和有效性:来自优化经导管瓣膜介入-经导管主动脉瓣植入术(OCEAN-TAVI)注册研究的见解
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(3):420-424. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx355.
3
The Vancouver 3M (Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist) Clinical Pathway Facilitates Safe Next-Day Discharge Home at Low-, Medium-, and High-Volume Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers: The 3M TAVR Study.温哥华 3M(多学科、多模式但简约)临床路径促进低、中、高容量经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换中心安全次日出院:3M TAVR 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 11;12(5):459-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.020.
4
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的清醒镇静与全身麻醉:来自美国胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的国家心血管数据注册协会的观点。
Circulation. 2017 Nov 28;136(22):2132-2140. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026656. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Fascia Iliaca Block as an Alternative Approach to Conscious Sedation as Compared to General Anesthesia.与全身麻醉相比,经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术采用髂筋膜阻滞作为清醒镇静的替代方法。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 May;21(5):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.08.080. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
6
Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Next-Day Discharge After Minimalist Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.微创经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后次日出院的预测因素和临床转归。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.021.
7
Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在导管室(极简方法)与杂交手术室(标准方法)中的比较:结果和成本分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
8
Feasibility and Safety of Adopting Next-Day Discharge as First-Line Option After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术后采用次日出院作为一线选择的可行性和安全性
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Mar;31(3):64-72. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00300.
9
Changes in Risk Profile and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement From the Pre- to Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Eras.从经导管主动脉瓣置换术前到术后时代,接受外科主动脉瓣置换术患者的风险状况和结局变化。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.083. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
10
Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement.接受极简式经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者缩短住院时间的安全性
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 1;91(2):345-353. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27230. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Periprocedural care for frail older patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的老年主动脉瓣狭窄虚弱患者的围手术期护理
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 28;58:101665. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101665. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
New Practices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: How I Do It in 2023.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的新实践:2023年我的操作方法
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1342. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041342.
3
The safety of early discharge following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia.全身麻醉下经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期出院的安全性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 21;9:1022018. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1022018. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Variation in Practice and Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的清醒镇静与全身麻醉:实践与结局的差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1277-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.008.
2
Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术的 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 29;382(9):799-809. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910555. Print 2020 Feb 27.
3
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Narrative Review of its Application in Cardiac Surgery.术后加速康复:在心脏外科中的应用述评。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun;109(6):1937-1944. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
5
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement.接受极简式经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者缩短住院时间的安全性
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 1;91(2):345-353. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27230. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review.术后加速康复:综述。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
8
Vancouver Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Clinical Pathway: Minimalist Approach, Standardized Care, and Discharge Criteria to Reduce Length of Stay.温哥华经导管主动脉瓣置换临床路径:采用极简主义方法、标准化护理及出院标准以缩短住院时间。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):312-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002541. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
9
Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion-related intraoperative morbidity: Implications of the minimalist approach.经股动脉入路主动脉瓣置换术相关术中并发症:微创策略的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1026-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
10
Minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The new standard for surgeons and cardiologists using transfemoral access?微创经导管主动脉瓣置换术:经股动脉入路的外科医生和心脏病专家的新标准?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;150(4):833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.078. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中安全实施术后加速康复方案

Safe implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

作者信息

Szerlip Molly, Tabachnick Deborah, Hamandi Mohanad, Caras LuAnn, Lanfear Allison T, Squiers John J, Harrington Katherine, Potluri Srinivasa P, DiMaio J Michael, Wooley Jordan, Pollock Benjamin, Schaffer Justin M, Brinkman William T, Brown David L, Mack Michael J

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Department, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas.

General Surgery Department, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020 Sep 23;34(1):5-10. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1810198.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2020.1810198
PMID:33456136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7785172/
Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are gaining wide acceptance. We evaluated ERAS protocol implementation in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients. The ERAS protocol included (1) moderate sedation or general anesthesia with on-table extubation, (2) no pulmonary artery or urinary catheters, (3) arterial line removal within 4 hours, (4) no postoperative narcotics, (5) mobilization at 4 hours and ambulation within 8 hours, and (6) antihypertensive reinstitution without nodal blockers. Patients who received TAVR before and after ERAS implementation were compared (N = 121 and N = 368, respectively). The primary endpoint was total hospital length of stay (LOS). ERAS patients had a lower mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (6.7% vs 7.5%;  = 0.04). Unadjusted analysis demonstrated that ERAS was associated with significantly decreased mean LOS (2.8 vs 4.0 days,  <  0.001), decreased 30-day mortality (0.8% vs 5.0%;  = 0.003), and increased discharge home (90.2% vs 79.3%,  = 0.002) with no increase in 30-day readmission (11.1% vs 14.0%,  = 0.39). After risk adjustment, ERAS patients had a 1.87-day shorter LOS ( = 0.001) and trended toward increased discharge home (odds ratio 1.76,  = 0.078) without increased readmission (odds ratio 0.74,  = 0.4). An ERAS protocol for TAVR is safe and is associated with shorter LOS without increased readmission.

摘要

术后加速康复(ERAS)方案正获得广泛认可。我们评估了经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者中ERAS方案的实施情况。ERAS方案包括:(1)适度镇静或全身麻醉并在手术台上拔管;(2)不放置肺动脉导管或尿管;(3)4小时内拔除动脉导管;(4)术后不使用麻醉性镇痛药;(5)4小时开始活动,8小时内下床行走;(6)重新使用抗高血压药物但不使用节点阻滞剂。对实施ERAS前后接受TAVR的患者进行了比较(分别为N = 121例和N = 368例)。主要终点是总住院时间(LOS)。接受ERAS的患者胸外科医师协会预测的平均死亡率较低(6.7%对7.5%;P = 0.04)。未经调整的分析表明,ERAS与平均LOS显著缩短(2.8天对4.0天,P < 0.001)、30天死亡率降低(0.8%对5.0%;P = 0.003)以及出院回家比例增加(90.2%对79.3%,P = 0.002)相关,且30天再入院率未增加(11.1%对14.0%,P = 0.39)。风险调整后,接受ERAS的患者LOS缩短1.87天(P = 0.001),出院回家的趋势增加(优势比1.76,P = 0.078),而再入院率未增加(优势比0.74,P = 0.4)。TAVR的ERAS方案是安全的,且与缩短LOS相关,同时不会增加再入院率。