• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全身麻醉下经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期出院的安全性。

The safety of early discharge following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia.

作者信息

Koren Ofir, Patel Vivek, Kohan Siamak, Naami Robert, Naami Edmund, Allison Zev, Natanzon Sharon Shalom, Shechter Alon, Nagasaka Takashi, Al Badri Ahmed, Devanabanda Arvind Reddy, Nakamura Mamoo, Cheng Wen, Jilaihawi Hasan, Makkar Raj R

机构信息

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 21;9:1022018. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1022018. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1022018
PMID:36337882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9634245/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence of the safety of same-day discharge for low-risk conscious sedated TAVR patients. However, the evidence supporting the safety of early discharge following GA-TAVR with routine transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is limited.

AIMS

To assess the safety of early discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using General Anesthesia (GA-TAVR) and identify predictors for patient selection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used data from 2,447 TEE-guided GA-TAVR patients performed at Cedars-Sinai between 2016 and 2021. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the discharge time from admission: 24 h, 24-48 h, and >48 h. Predictors for 30-day outcomes (cumulative adverse events and death) were validated on a matched cohort of 24 h vs. >24 h using the bootstrap model.

RESULTS

The >48 h group had significantly worse baseline cardiovascular profile, higher surgical risk, low functional status, and higher procedural complications than the 24 h and the 24-48 h groups. The rate of 30-day outcomes was significantly lower in the 24 h than the >48 h but did not differ from the 24-48 h (11.3 vs. 15.5 vs. 11.7%, = 0.003 and = 0.71, respectively). Independent poor prognostic factors of 30-day outcomes had a high STS risk of ≥8 (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.30-2.77, -value = 3.2, < 0.001), low left ventricle ejection fraction of <30% (OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.96-9.10, -value = 11.5, < 0.001), and life-threatening procedural complications (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.20-5.89, -value = 4.7, = 0.04). Our formulated predictors showed a good discrimination ability for patient selection (AUC: 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81).

CONCLUSION

Discharge within 24 h following GA-TAVR using TEE is safe for selected patients using our proposed validated predictors.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,低风险清醒镇静经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者当日出院是安全的。然而,支持全身麻醉下经导管主动脉瓣置换术(GA-TAVR)并常规行经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查后早期出院安全性的证据有限。

目的

评估全身麻醉下经导管主动脉瓣置换术(GA-TAVR)后早期出院的安全性,并确定患者选择的预测因素。

材料与方法

我们使用了2016年至2021年在雪松西奈医疗中心进行的2447例TEE引导下GA-TAVR患者的数据。根据入院后出院时间将患者分为三组:24小时、24至48小时和>48小时。使用自举模型在24小时与>24小时的匹配队列中验证30天结局(累积不良事件和死亡)的预测因素。

结果

与24小时组和24至48小时组相比,>48小时组的基线心血管状况明显更差,手术风险更高,功能状态低下,手术并发症更多。24小时组的30天结局发生率明显低于>48小时组,但与24至48小时组无差异(分别为11.3%、15.5%和11.7%,P = 0.003和P = 0.71)。30天结局的独立不良预后因素包括高危外科医生协会(STS)风险≥8(比值比1.90,95%置信区间1.30 - 2.77,P值 = 3.2,P < 0.001)、左心室射血分数<30%(比值比6.0,95%置信区间3.96 - 9.10,P值 = 11.5,P < 0.001)以及危及生命的手术并发症(比值比2.65,95%置信区间1.20 - 5.89,P值 = 4.7,P = 0.04)。我们制定的预测因素对患者选择具有良好的鉴别能力(曲线下面积:0.78,95%置信区间0.75 - 0.81)。

结论

对于使用我们提出并经验证的预测因素选择出的患者,TEE引导下GA-TAVR术后24小时内出院是安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/2f4822c665d2/fcvm-09-1022018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/9a82cc075ea0/fcvm-09-1022018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/4578e34274bf/fcvm-09-1022018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/18efd33fc0d3/fcvm-09-1022018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/f30e6f772ecb/fcvm-09-1022018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/beed241dd70d/fcvm-09-1022018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/2f4822c665d2/fcvm-09-1022018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/9a82cc075ea0/fcvm-09-1022018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/4578e34274bf/fcvm-09-1022018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/18efd33fc0d3/fcvm-09-1022018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/f30e6f772ecb/fcvm-09-1022018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/beed241dd70d/fcvm-09-1022018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cd/9634245/2f4822c665d2/fcvm-09-1022018-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The safety of early discharge following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia.全身麻醉下经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期出院的安全性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 21;9:1022018. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1022018. eCollection 2022.
2
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的清醒镇静与全身麻醉:来自美国胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的国家心血管数据注册协会的观点。
Circulation. 2017 Nov 28;136(22):2132-2140. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026656. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
Improved costs and outcomes with conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in TAVR patients: Time to wake up?经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者中,与全身麻醉相比,清醒镇静可改善成本和预后:是时候清醒了?
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0173777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173777. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparison of clinical outcomes with the utilization of monitored anesthesia care vs. general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中,监护麻醉与全身麻醉的临床结局比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Fascia Iliaca Block as an Alternative Approach to Conscious Sedation as Compared to General Anesthesia.与全身麻醉相比,经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术采用髂筋膜阻滞作为清醒镇静的替代方法。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 May;21(5):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.08.080. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
6
Safety and predictors of next-day discharge after elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.择期经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后次日出院的安全性及预测因素
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Dec;18(8):583-587. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
The Evolution of Echocardiographic Type and Anesthetic Technique for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement at a High-Volume Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Center.高容量经导管主动脉瓣置换中心经导管主动脉瓣置换术的超声心动图类型及麻醉技术的演变
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jan;33(1):29-35. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
8
Safety of Conscious Sedation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Without an Anesthetist.经导管主动脉瓣置换术无麻醉师行清醒镇静的安全性。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Mar;33(3):E220-E224. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
The Vancouver 3M (Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist) Clinical Pathway Facilitates Safe Next-Day Discharge Home at Low-, Medium-, and High-Volume Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers: The 3M TAVR Study.温哥华 3M(多学科、多模式但简约)临床路径促进低、中、高容量经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换中心安全次日出院:3M TAVR 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 11;12(5):459-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.020.
10
Standardized methodology for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Sapien XT valve under fluoroscopy guidance.在荧光透视引导下使用爱德华兹Sapien XT瓣膜进行经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的标准化方法。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Sep;26(9):451-61.

本文引用的文献

1
Same-Day Discharge Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Multicenter PROTECT TAVR Study.COVID-19 大流行期间经导管主动脉瓣置换术后当日出院:多中心 PROTECT TAVR 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 28;15(6):590-598. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.12.046.
2
Feasibility and Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后当日出院的可行性和安全性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 28;15(6):575-589. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.013.
3
An Update on New Generation Transcatheter Aortic Valves and Delivery Systems.
新一代经导管主动脉瓣及输送系统的最新进展
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 19;11(3):499. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030499.
4
Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A National Inpatient Sample Database Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者死亡率的预测因素:一项全国住院患者样本数据库分析。
Cureus. 2021 Apr 7;13(4):e14344. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14344.
5
Hospital Variation in 30-Day Readmissions Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天内再入院的医院差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e021350. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021350. Epub 2021 May 3.
6
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3 期:主动脉瓣临床研究更新的终点定义。
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
7
Safe implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中安全实施术后加速康复方案
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020 Sep 23;34(1):5-10. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1810198.
8
Safety of same-day discharge after uncomplicated, minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the COVID-19 era.在 COVID-19 时代,行简化经导管主动脉瓣置换术且术后无并发症患者的当日出院安全性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):940-947. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29453. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
9
General Versus Local Anesthesia With Conscious Sedation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Randomized SOLVE-TAVI Trial.全身麻醉与局部麻醉联合镇静在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用:随机 SOLVE-TAVI 试验。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 13;142(15):1437-1447. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046451. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
10
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Variation in Practice and Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的清醒镇静与全身麻醉:实践与结局的差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1277-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.008.