• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受极简式经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者缩短住院时间的安全性

Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

作者信息

Alkhalil Ahmad, Lamba Harveen, Deo Salil, Bezerra Hiram G, Patel Sandeep M, Markowitz Alan, Simon Daniel I, Costa Marco A, Davis Angela C, Attizzani Guilherme F

机构信息

Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 1;91(2):345-353. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27230. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.27230
PMID:28836345
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine the feasibility and predictors of early discharge after minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

Duration of hospitalization has a direct impact on overall cost of care, but the clinical impact of length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing minimalist TAVR remains unclear.

METHODS

We studied 268 patients who underwent minimalist TAVR. Short LOS (sLOS) was defined as post-procedural LOS ≤ 3 days and observed in 163 patients. Prolonged LOS (pLOS) was observed in 105 patients. Propensity score matching based on 39 variables yielded 54 pairs of patients in each group. We analyzed 30-day mortality, 30-day re-hospitalization and long-term survival data. Multivariate regression models were used to define predictors of sLOS.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 0% versus 5.5% in the sLOS and pLOS groups, respectively (P = 0.08). Incidence of re-hospitalization was higher in pLOS (13% vs. 3.7%). sLOS was associated with lower odds ratio of minor vascular complication (OR 0.1 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.75], P = 0.05), any bleeding (OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.14, 0.87], P = 0.02), blood transfusion (OR 0.27 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.81], P = 0.02), and new pacemaker implantation (OR 0.23 [95% CI: 0.1, 0.53], P < 0.001). Discharge to home had a significantly higher odd ratio for sLOS (OR 8.67 [95% CI: 3.59, 23.11], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In appropriately selected patients, sLOS following minimalist TAVR approach in an experienced and high volume center is feasible and safe. Implementing such a strategy may reduce medical costs with the potential clinical benefit of early re-habilitation for the elderly TAVR population.

摘要

目的

确定简化经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后早期出院的可行性及预测因素。

背景

住院时间对总体医疗费用有直接影响,但简化TAVR患者的住院时长(LOS)的临床影响仍不明确。

方法

我们研究了268例行简化TAVR的患者。短住院时长(sLOS)定义为术后LOS≤3天,163例患者观察到该情况。105例患者观察到长住院时长(pLOS)。基于39个变量进行倾向评分匹配,每组产生54对患者。我们分析了30天死亡率、30天再住院率及长期生存数据。采用多因素回归模型确定sLOS的预测因素。

结果

sLOS组和pLOS组的30天死亡率分别为0%和5.5%(P = 0.08)。pLOS组的再住院发生率更高(13%对3.7%)。sLOS与较低的轻微血管并发症比值比相关(OR 0.1[95%CI:0.01,0.75],P = 0.05)、任何出血(OR 0.35[95%CI:0.14,0.87],P = 0.02)、输血(OR 0.27[95%CI:0.08,0.81],P = 0.02)及新起搏器植入(OR 0.23[95%CI:0.1,0.53],P < 0.001)。出院回家的sLOS比值比显著更高(OR 8.67[95%CI:3.59,23.11],P < 0.001)。

结论

在经验丰富且手术量大的中心,对适当选择的患者采用简化TAVR方法后的sLOS是可行且安全的。实施该策略可能降低医疗成本,并为老年TAVR人群带来早期康复的潜在临床益处。

相似文献

1
Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement.接受极简式经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者缩短住院时间的安全性
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 1;91(2):345-353. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27230. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Next-Day Discharge After Minimalist Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.微创经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后次日出院的预测因素和临床转归。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.021.
3
The Vancouver 3M (Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist) Clinical Pathway Facilitates Safe Next-Day Discharge Home at Low-, Medium-, and High-Volume Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers: The 3M TAVR Study.温哥华 3M(多学科、多模式但简约)临床路径促进低、中、高容量经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换中心安全次日出院:3M TAVR 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 11;12(5):459-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.020.
4
Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的住院时间和出院去向。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006929. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006929.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Adopting Next-Day Discharge as First-Line Option After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术后采用次日出院作为一线选择的可行性和安全性
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Mar;31(3):64-72. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00300.
6
Outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity matched analysis.肝硬化患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的结局及再入院情况:一项倾向匹配分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):90-96. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27232. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Comparison of outcomes with surgical cut-down versus percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: TAVR transfemoral access comparisons between surgical cut-down and percutaneous approach.经手术切开与经皮股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结局比较:手术切开与经皮入路之间的经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)入路比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;91(7):1354-1362. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27377. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a minimalist approach.采用简化方法进行经导管主动脉瓣置换的结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):192-195. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
9
Safety and predictors of next-day discharge after elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.择期经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后次日出院的安全性及预测因素
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Dec;18(8):583-587. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 19.
10
Safety and efficacy of minimalist approach in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular interventioN-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中极简方法的安全性和有效性:来自优化经导管瓣膜介入-经导管主动脉瓣植入术(OCEAN-TAVI)注册研究的见解
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(3):420-424. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx355.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of conduction disturbances after TAVI: the last step towards early discharge.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后传导障碍的管理:迈向早期出院的最后一步。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 May 28;22(5):534-546. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.004.
2
Predictors of Length-of-Stay Among Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm.使用监督机器学习算法预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的住院时间
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun 24;4(8):101902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902.
3
[[Projection selection and rapid atrial pacing improves early outcomes after self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves]].
[经导管自膨式主动脉瓣置换术后的投影选择与快速心房起搏可改善早期预后]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2025 Mar 11;7(2):82-90. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000497. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
4
A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the BENCHMARK study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的简化途径:BENCHMARK 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Jun 1;45(21):1904-1916. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae147.
5
Sex-Specific Considerations in Degenerative Aortic Stenosis for Female-Tailored Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation Management.女性特有的退行性主动脉瓣狭窄的性别相关考量因素:经股动脉主动脉瓣植入管理的女性化定制策略。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e025944. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025944. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
2022 SASCI/SCTSSA joint consensus statement and guideline on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in South Africa.2022 年南非经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的 SASCI/SCTSSA 联合共识声明和指南。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2022;33(5):267-269. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2022-049. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
7
Safe implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中安全实施术后加速康复方案
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020 Sep 23;34(1):5-10. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1810198.
8
Prespecified Risk Criteria Facilitate Adequate Discharge and Long-Term Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.预先规定的风险标准有助于经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术后充分出院和长期结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(15):e016990. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016990. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
9
Use of Electrophysiological Studies in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.电生理研究在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2020 Jun 3;9(1):20-27. doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.38.3.
10
Pacemaker Implantation After Balloon- or Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经皮球囊或自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的起搏器植入。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015896. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015896. Epub 2020 May 2.