Ashman Harriet, Rigg Dean, Moore Fionna
South East Coast Ambulance Service ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-5492.
South East Coast Ambulance Service.
Br Paramed J. 2020 Dec 1;5(3):52-58. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.52.
Although burn emergencies are infrequently encountered, the ambulance service is often the first point of contact for patients in these situations. It is therefore important that these potentially devastating injuries are managed in accordance with the evidence base. Appropriate assessment and management of these patients in the pre-hospital phase will have a significant impact upon their long-term outcomes, such as scarring cosmesis and functionality.
This audit was conducted to determine if patients presenting to one UK ambulance service with thermal burn injuries were managed safely, effectively and in a timely manner. Areas highlighted for improvement will assist in directing future pre-hospital research and educational requirements. Epidemiological data will also be provided.
278 thermal burn incidents occurring from June 2017 to May 2018 (inclusive) were included in this audit. A larger proportion of burn patients were paediatrics who fell into the 0-10 age category, most burn patients were injured at a home address and only nine of the overall sample were major burns. Only 35% of patients received adequate cooling of their burns, an essential first aid intervention. The assessment of pain (87%) and provision of analgesia (75%) showed a higher compliance rate. However, only 54% had pain reassessed after analgesia. There was a near 100% compliance rate for patients being managed without hydrogel dressings and topical medicines.
The results indicate several areas for improvement within the ambulance trust. Of importance is the application of basic first aid, such as cooling. It is important not only to improve education among staff but also to understand non-compliance. It should be acknowledged that assessment of pain and provision of analgesia demonstrated far higher compliance compared to current pre-hospital evidence. Several points for education and research have been identified.
尽管烧伤急诊并不常见,但在这些情况下,救护车服务往往是患者的首个接触点。因此,依据循证医学对这些可能造成严重破坏的损伤进行处理非常重要。在院前阶段对这些患者进行适当的评估和处理,将对他们的长期预后产生重大影响,如瘢痕形成、美观及功能。
本次审核旨在确定一家英国救护车服务机构对热烧伤患者的处理是否安全、有效且及时。突出需要改进的领域将有助于指导未来的院前研究和教育需求。同时还将提供流行病学数据。
本次审核纳入了2017年6月至2018年5月(含)期间发生的278起热烧伤事件。烧伤患者中较大比例是0至10岁的儿童,大多数烧伤患者在家中受伤,总体样本中只有9例为重度烧伤。只有35%的患者接受了足够的烧伤冷却处理,这是一项基本的急救干预措施。疼痛评估(87%)和镇痛措施的提供(75%)显示出较高的依从率。然而,只有54%的患者在镇痛后进行了疼痛再评估。未使用水凝胶敷料和局部用药处理的患者依从率接近100%。
结果表明该救护车信托机构存在几个需要改进的方面。重要的是应用基本急救措施,如冷却处理。不仅要提高工作人员的教育水平,还要了解不依从的情况。应该认识到,与当前的院前证据相比,疼痛评估和镇痛措施的依从率要高得多。已确定了几个教育和研究要点。