Scoring systems in the critically ill: uses, cautions, and future directions.
作者信息
Desai N, Gross J
机构信息
Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
出版信息
BJA Educ. 2019 Jul;19(7):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scoring systems in the critically ill: uses, cautions, and future directions.危重症评分系统：用途、注意事项及未来方向。
BJA Educ. 2019 Jul;19(7):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
Establishment of MELD-lactate clearance scoring system in predicting death risk of critically ill cirrhotic patients.MELD-乳酸清除评分系统的建立在预测危重症肝硬化患者死亡风险中的应用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02351-5.
3
Intensive care unit scoring systems outperform emergency department scoring systems for mortality prediction in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.重症监护病房评分系统比急诊科评分系统更能预测危重病患者的死亡率：一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Intensive Care. 2014 Jul 1;2:40. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-40. eCollection 2014.
4
Association of Mitral Regurgitation with Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Noncardiac Surgery Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.重症非心脏手术患者二尖瓣反流与术后心房颤动的关联：一项前瞻性队列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Feb 28;16:769-783. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S400122. eCollection 2023.
5
Establishment and Validation of GV-SAPS II Scoring System for Non-Diabetic Critically Ill Patients.非糖尿病重症患者GV-SAPS II评分系统的建立与验证
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 8;11(11):e0166085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166085. eCollection 2016.
6
Scoring systems in critically ill: Which one to use in cancer patients?危重症评分系统：癌症患者应使用哪一种？
World J Crit Care Med. 2022 Nov 9;11(6):364-374. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i6.364.
7
[Delirium in the critically ill].[危重症患者的谵妄]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2009 Oct 19;171(43):3094-7.
8
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者的早期与晚期气管切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11(11):CD015532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.
9
Survival, Outcomes, and Use of Acuity Scoring Systems Following Tracheotomy in Veteran Patients.退伍军人患者气管切开术后的生存、结局和使用急性评分系统情况。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Nov;37(11):890-896. doi: 10.1177/1049909120914518. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
10
Sleep quality and circadian rhythm disruption in the intensive care unit: a review.重症监护病房中的睡眠质量与昼夜节律紊乱：综述
Nat Sci Sleep. 2017 Nov 10;9:277-284. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S151525. eCollection 2017.
引用本文的文献
1
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome: From Diagnosis to Long-Term Management-A Narrative Review.肥胖低通气综合征的多学科诊疗方法：从诊断到长期管理——一篇叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;15(17):2120. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172120.
2
A Study to Assess the Pancreatitis Three-Factor Scoring System in Comparison With Computed Tomography (CT) Severity Index Scoring in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.一项评估胰腺炎三因素评分系统与计算机断层扫描（CT）严重指数评分在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的比较研究。
Cureus. 2025 Aug 1;17(8):e89188. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89188. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Association Between Lactic Dehydrogenase-to-Albumin Ratio and Short-Time Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者乳酸脱氢酶与白蛋白比值和短期死亡率的关系
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Jul 15;20:2435-2444. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S521192. eCollection 2025.
4
Discriminatory Performance of APACHE II Score and the Prediction of Mortality within the ICU in Patients with Sepsis Admitted to the ICU.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）在入住重症监护病房（ICU）的脓毒症患者中的鉴别表现及ICU内死亡率预测
Mater Sociomed. 2025;37(2):153-158. doi: 10.5455/msm.2025.37.153-158.
5
Comparative Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV and Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 in Critically Ill Children with Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study.儿童癌症重症患儿中儿科死亡风险评分IV与儿科死亡率指数3的比较性能：一项前瞻性观察研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun;29(6):486-491. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24979. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
6
An open intensive care unit (ICU) model is a viable option for the acute expansion of ICU capacity in the state sector: A study of a needs-based strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary ICU in South Africa.开放式重症监护病房（ICU）模式是国有部门急性扩大ICU容量的可行选择：一项关于南非一家三级ICU在新冠疫情期间基于需求的策略的研究。
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 28;31(1):e2004. doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2025.v31i1.2004. eCollection 2025.
7
Assessment of Phoenix Sepsis Score, pSOFA, PELOD-2, and PRISM III in Pediatric Intensive Care.小儿重症监护中凤凰脓毒症评分、序贯器官衰竭评估（pSOFA）、儿科死亡概率模型2（PELOD-2）及小儿死亡风险评估系统（PRISM III）的评估
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;12(3):262. doi: 10.3390/children12030262.
8
Outcomes after critical care admission in people with a learning disability.学习障碍患者重症监护入院后的结局
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Dec 2;26(1):61-67. doi: 10.1177/17511437241301922. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality.分析 SOFA 评分的各项组成部分随时间推移对死亡率的影响变化。
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Nov 22;36:e20240030en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240030-en. eCollection 2024.
10
External validation of a modified cardiovascular sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with suspected infection using the MIMIC-IV database.使用 MIMIC-IV 数据库对疑似感染患者的改良心血管序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行外部验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0312185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312185. eCollection 2024.
本文引用的文献
1
The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.衰弱对重症监护病房结局的影响：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1105-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4867-0. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
2
SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.SOFA 评分与随机对照试验中的死亡率终点：系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Crit Care. 2017 Feb 24;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1609-1.
3
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
4
Clinical decision-making and secondary findings in systems medicine.系统医学中的临床决策与次要发现
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 May 21;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0113-5.
5
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
6
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估：针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
7
Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock.活化的人重组凝血因子 VII 治疗成人感染性休克。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2055-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202290. Epub 2012 May 22.
8
Ten reasons why we should NOT use severity scores as entry criteria for clinical trials or in our treatment decisions.十大理由：临床研究不应采用严重程度评分作为入组标准，也不应以此作为治疗决策的依据。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):283-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b785a2.
9
Dermatological conditions in intensive care: a secondary analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme database.重症监护中的皮肤病：重症监护国家审计与研究中心（ICNARC）病例组合项目数据库的二次分析
Crit Care. 2008;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/cc6141. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
10
A new risk prediction model for critical care: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) model.一种用于重症监护的新风险预测模型：重症监护国家审计与研究中心（ICNARC）模型。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1091-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259468.24532.44.
Zotero 插件