• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析 SOFA 评分的各项组成部分随时间推移对死亡率的影响变化。

Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Boston (MA), United States.

Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Cambridge (MA), United States.

出版信息

Crit Care Sci. 2024 Nov 22;36:e20240030en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240030-en. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240030-en
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine how each organ component of the SOFA score differs in its contribution to mortality risk and how that contribution may change over time.

METHODS

We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the contribution of each organ component to mortality risk on Days 1 and 7 of an intensive care unit stay. We used data from two publicly available datasets, eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) (208 hospitals) and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) (1 hospital). The odds ratio of each SOFA component that contributed to mortality was calculated. Mortality was defined as death either in the intensive care unit or within 72 hours of discharge from the intensive care unit.

RESULTS

A total of 7,871 intensive care unit stays from eICU-CRD and 4,926 intensive care unit stays from MIMIC-IV were included. Liver dysfunction was most predictive of mortality on Day 1 in both cohorts (OR 1.3; 95%CI 1.2 - 1.4; OR 1.3; 95%CI 1.2 - 1.4, respectively). In the eICU-CRD cohort, central nervous system dysfunction was most predictive of mortality on Day 7 (OR 1.4; 95%CI 1.4 - 1.5). In the MIMIC-IV cohort, respiratory dysfunction (OR 1.4; 95%CI 1.3 - 1.5) and cardiovascular dysfunction (OR 1.4; 95%CI 1.3 - 1.5) were most predictive of mortality on Day 7.

CONCLUSION

The SOFA score may be an oversimplification of how dysfunction of different organ systems contributes to mortality over time. Further research at a more granular timescale is needed to explore how the SOFA score can evolve and be ameliorated.

摘要

目的

确定 SOFA 评分的每个器官组成部分在对死亡率风险的贡献方面有何不同,以及这种贡献如何随时间变化。

方法

我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估每个器官组成部分在入住重症监护病房第 1 天和第 7 天对死亡率风险的贡献。我们使用了两个公开可用数据集的数据,即 eICU 协作研究数据库 (eICU-CRD)(208 家医院)和重症监护医学信息集市 IV (MIMIC-IV)(1 家医院)。计算了对死亡率有贡献的每个 SOFA 成分的优势比。死亡率定义为在重症监护病房内死亡或从重症监护病房出院后 72 小时内死亡。

结果

共纳入了来自 eICU-CRD 的 7871 例重症监护病房入住和来自 MIMIC-IV 的 4926 例重症监护病房入住。在两个队列中,肝功能障碍在第 1 天对死亡率的预测最准确(OR 1.3;95%CI 1.2-1.4;OR 1.3;95%CI 1.2-1.4)。在 eICU-CRD 队列中,中枢神经系统功能障碍在第 7 天对死亡率的预测最准确(OR 1.4;95%CI 1.4-1.5)。在 MIMIC-IV 队列中,呼吸功能障碍(OR 1.4;95%CI 1.3-1.5)和心血管功能障碍(OR 1.4;95%CI 1.3-1.5)在第 7 天对死亡率的预测最准确。

结论

SOFA 评分可能过于简化了不同器官系统功能障碍随时间推移对死亡率的贡献。需要在更细粒度的时间尺度上进行进一步研究,以探讨 SOFA 评分如何演变和改善。

相似文献

1
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality.分析 SOFA 评分的各项组成部分随时间推移对死亡率的影响变化。
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Nov 22;36:e20240030en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240030-en. eCollection 2024.
2
The relationship between hematocrit and serum albumin levels difference and mortality in elderly sepsis patients in intensive care units-a retrospective study based on two large database.基于两个大型数据库的回顾性研究:老年脓毒症患者 ICU 中血细胞比容和血清白蛋白水平差值与死亡率的关系。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07609-7.
3
Comparison of different intensive care scoring systems and Glasgow Aneurysm score for aortic aneurysm in predicting 28-day mortality: a retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.比较不同的重症监护评分系统和格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分对预测主动脉瘤 28 天死亡率的作用:来自 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04184-4.
4
A time-incorporated SOFA score-based machine learning model for predicting mortality in critically ill patients: A multicenter, real-world study.一种基于时间整合的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的机器学习模型用于预测危重症患者的死亡率:一项多中心、真实世界研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jul;163:104776. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104776. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
Relationship between the albumin-corrected anion gap and short-term prognosis among patients with cardiogenic shock: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV and eICU databases.心源性休克患者白蛋白校正阴离子间隙与短期预后的关系:MIMIC-IV和eICU数据库的回顾性分析
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 2;14(10):e081597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081597.
6
Accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Relevance to Crisis Standards of Care.按种族划分的序贯器官衰竭评估评分对住院死亡率的准确性和与危重病标准护理的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113891. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13891.
7
[Predictive value of sequential organ failure assessment on 28-day mortality in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome].[序贯器官衰竭评估对心脏骤停后综合征患者28天死亡率的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Dec;34(12):1253-1257. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220117-00068.
8
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估组件评分预测脓毒症患者住院死亡率。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):810-817. doi: 10.1177/0885066618795400. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
9
[Effects of circadian heart rate variation on short-term and long-term mortality in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-II database].[昼夜心率变异性对重症监护病房患者短期和长期死亡率的影响:基于MIMIC-II数据库的回顾性队列研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Sep;31(9):1128-1132. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.09.014.
10
Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Mortality in a Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Population.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对当代心脏重症监护病房人群死亡率的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 10;7(6):e008169. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008169.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases.在医疗保健数据库中使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分动态组件所面临的挑战。
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Nov 22;36:e20240224en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240224-en. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Why the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score needs updating?为什么序贯器官衰竭评估评分需要更新?
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Apr 8;36:e20240296en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240296-en. eCollection 2024.
2
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score: has the time come for an update?序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分:是否到了更新的时候?
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 13;27(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04290-9.
3
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
4
ICU scoring systems.重症监护病房评分系统。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;49(2):223-225. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06914-8. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与死亡率的相关性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):731-741. doi: 10.1111/aas.14067. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
6
Scoring systems in the critically ill: uses, cautions, and future directions.危重症评分系统:用途、注意事项及未来方向。
BJA Educ. 2019 Jul;19(7):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
A practical method for dealing with missing Glasgow Coma Scale verbal component scores.一种处理格拉斯哥昏迷量表语言部分缺失评分的实用方法。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Sep 8;135(1):214-219. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS20992. Print 2021 Jul 1.
8
Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.急性肾损伤中肾脏替代治疗的启动时机。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):240-251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000741.
9
Mortality Prediction Using SOFA Score in Critically Ill Surgical and Non-Surgical Patients: Which Parameter Is the Most Valuable?使用 SOFA 评分对危重症手术和非手术患者进行死亡率预测:哪个参数最有价值?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jun 4;56(6):273. doi: 10.3390/medicina56060273.
10
Early noncardiovascular organ failure and mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit.心脏重症监护病房中非心血管器官衰竭与死亡的早期预测。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 May;43(5):516-523. doi: 10.1002/clc.23339. Epub 2020 Jan 30.