• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用阶梯式访谈和层次价值映射以深入了解改善医院患者体验:一项系统文献综述

Using Laddering Interviews and Hierarchical Value Mapping to Gain Insights Into Improving Patient Experience in the Hospital: A Systematic Literature Review.

作者信息

Kumar Pankaj, Follen Michele, Huang Chi-Cheng, Cathey Amy

机构信息

Section on Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kings County Hospital, New York City Health and Hospital Corporation, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1740-1747. doi: 10.1177/2374373520942425. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520942425
PMID:33457638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786779/
Abstract

Hospitals are continuously facing pressures to mitigate the gap between patient's expectations and the quality of services provided. Now with Medicare reimbursements tied to Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores, institutions are attempting interventions to increase satisfaction scores. However, a standard framework to understand patient values and perceptions and subsequently translate it into reliable measures of patient satisfaction does not exist, particularly in the inpatient settings. This article highlights opportunity for the addition of qualitative customer value research to augment the information providers gain from HCAHPS scores and provide additional indicators that can be used in improving the patient experience. In this article, patient laddering interviews and hierarchical value mapping are reviewed as methodologies to understand patient core satisfaction values during their hospital stay. A systematic literature search was performed to identify articles addressing laddering interviews and hierarchical value mapping as applied to health care. Inclusion criteria involved studies relating to health care and using laddering interviews. Exclusion criteria included non-health-care studies. Only 3 studies were found eligible for this review. Our systematic review of literature revealed only few studies which may help to guide us to improve patient experience using laddering interviews. These interviews can help compose a personalized bedside survey which may be more meaningful than current widely used HCAHPS survey.

摘要

医院一直面临着缓解患者期望与所提供服务质量之间差距的压力。如今,医疗保险报销与医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)得分挂钩,各机构正试图采取干预措施来提高满意度得分。然而,目前尚不存在一个能够理解患者价值观和认知,并将其转化为可靠的患者满意度衡量标准的标准框架,尤其是在住院环境中。本文强调了增加定性客户价值研究的机会,以补充提供者从HCAHPS得分中获得的信息,并提供可用于改善患者体验的额外指标。在本文中,患者阶梯访谈和层次价值映射作为理解患者住院期间核心满意度价值观的方法进行了综述。进行了系统的文献检索,以识别涉及应用于医疗保健领域的阶梯访谈和层次价值映射的文章。纳入标准包括与医疗保健相关且使用阶梯访谈的研究。排除标准包括非医疗保健研究。仅发现3项研究符合本综述的条件。我们对文献的系统综述表明,只有少数研究可能有助于指导我们通过阶梯访谈来改善患者体验。这些访谈有助于编制个性化的床边调查,这可能比目前广泛使用的HCAHPS调查更有意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/7786779/8c84c34c49fe/10.1177_2374373520942425-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/7786779/8c84c34c49fe/10.1177_2374373520942425-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/7786779/8c84c34c49fe/10.1177_2374373520942425-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Laddering Interviews and Hierarchical Value Mapping to Gain Insights Into Improving Patient Experience in the Hospital: A Systematic Literature Review.运用阶梯式访谈和层次价值映射以深入了解改善医院患者体验:一项系统文献综述
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1740-1747. doi: 10.1177/2374373520942425. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The Development of a Pediatric Inpatient Experience of Care Measure: Child HCAHPS.儿科住院患者护理体验指标的发展:儿童医疗保健消费者评价(Child HCAHPS)
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):360-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0966. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
4
A Qualitative Exploration to Understand Hospitalists' Attitude Toward the Patient Experience Scoring System.一项旨在了解住院医师对患者体验评分系统态度的定性研究
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1036-1043. doi: 10.1177/2374373520942418. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
A Strategic Framework for Improving the Patient Experience in Hospitals.改善医院患者体验的战略框架。
J Healthc Manag. 2017 Jul/Aug;62(4):250-259. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-17-00071.
6
Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores.腰椎手术后急诊就诊与较低的医疗机构患者评估系统评分相关。
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.043. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Predictors of Hospital Patient Satisfaction as Measured by HCAHPS: A Systematic Review.通过医院患者医疗服务评价(HCAHPS)衡量的医院患者满意度预测因素:一项系统综述
J Healthc Manag. 2017 Jul/Aug;62(4):272-283. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-15-00050.
8
Examining the effect of EVS spending on HCAHPS scores: a value optimization matrix for expense management.考察 EVS 支出对 HCAHPS 评分的影响:费用管理的价值优化矩阵。
J Healthc Manag. 2013 Sep-Oct;58(5):320-34; discussion 334-5.
9
Predicting Inpatient Dissatisfaction Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 3,593 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey Responses.预测全膝关节置换术后患者的不满:对 3593 份医院消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统调查回复的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):824-833. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Demographic factors and hospital size predict patient satisfaction variance--implications for hospital value-based purchasing.人口统计学因素和医院规模可预测患者满意度差异——对医院基于价值的采购的启示
J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):503-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2371. Epub 2015 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-time patient experience surveys of hospitalized medical patients.住院内科患者的实时患者体验调查。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Apr;11(4):251-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2533. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
2
Improving patient satisfaction through physician education, feedback, and incentives.通过医生教育、反馈和激励措施提高患者满意度。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):497-502. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2373. Epub 2015 May 27.
3
Demographic factors and hospital size predict patient satisfaction variance--implications for hospital value-based purchasing.人口统计学因素和医院规模可预测患者满意度差异——对医院基于价值的采购的启示
J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):503-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2371. Epub 2015 May 4.
4
Comparison of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient satisfaction scores for specialty hospitals and general medical hospitals: confounding effect of survey response rate.专科医院与综合医院的医疗服务提供者及系统医院消费者评估患者满意度得分比较:调查回复率的混杂效应
J Hosp Med. 2014 Sep;9(9):590-3. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2225. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
Appraising the practice of etiquette-based medicine in the inpatient setting.评价基于礼仪的医学在住院环境中的实践。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):908-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2328-6. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
Effect of sitting vs. standing on perception of provider time at bedside: a pilot study.坐姿与站姿对患者感知医护人员在床边时间的影响:一项初步研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
7
Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days.患者对住院护理的满意度与 30 天内再次住院之间的关系。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jan;17(1):41-8.
8
Identifying professional characteristics of the ideal medical doctor: the laddering technique.明确理想医生的职业特征:阶梯技术。
Med Teach. 2010;32(2):136-40. doi: 10.3109/01421590903196987.
9
Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies.患者满意度研究中的回应率:对210项已发表研究的分析
Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Aug;10(4):311-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311.