• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过医院患者医疗服务评价(HCAHPS)衡量的医院患者满意度预测因素:一项系统综述

Predictors of Hospital Patient Satisfaction as Measured by HCAHPS: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Mazurenko Olena, Collum Taleah, Ferdinand Alva, Menachemi Nir

机构信息

Olena Mazurenko, PhD, MD, assistant professor, Health Policy and Management Department, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indiana; Taleah Collum, PhD, assistant professor, School of Business & Industry, Jackson State University, Jacksonville, Alabama; Alva Ferdinand, DrPH, JD, assistant professor, Health Policy & Management, Texas A&M School of Public Health, College Station, Texas; and Nir Menachemi, PhD, professor, Health Policy and Management Department, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis.

出版信息

J Healthc Manag. 2017 Jul/Aug;62(4):272-283. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-15-00050.

DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-15-00050
PMID:28683051
Abstract

Because Medicare reimbursements are now, in part, based on patient satisfaction scores, hospitals are increasingly concerned about improving patient satisfaction. However, little is known about the different characteristics that are associated with higher patient satisfaction. This study was conducted to systematically review the patient satisfaction literature and to identify predictors of patient satisfaction based on measures from the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2007 to February 2015 for relevant peer-reviewed studies. A total of 41 studies met our inclusion criteria and were categorized into three groups (levels) based on the types of predictors used in the study: patient (12 articles, 29.9%), hospital (29 articles, 70.1%), or market (4 articles, 9.7%) predictors. We present a narrative review of the included studies in which certain patient- and hospital-level predictors were consistently associated with higher patient satisfaction (e.g., patient perception of well-managed pain and not-for-profit status) or lower patient satisfaction (e.g., racial/ethnic minority, hospital's safety net status, metropolitan area). Moreover, several predictors had mixed relationships with patient satisfaction across studies (e.g., teaching status, number of beds). Finally, we found that only a small number of studies have examined the association between market-level predictors and patient satisfaction.

摘要

由于医疗保险报销现在部分基于患者满意度评分,医院越来越关注提高患者满意度。然而,对于与较高患者满意度相关的不同特征知之甚少。本研究旨在系统回顾患者满意度文献,并根据医院患者医疗服务提供者和系统评估(HCAHPS)调查的衡量标准确定患者满意度的预测因素。我们检索了2007年1月至2015年2月期间PubMed和Scopus数据库中的相关同行评审研究。共有41项研究符合我们的纳入标准,并根据研究中使用的预测因素类型分为三组(级别):患者(12篇文章,29.9%)、医院(29篇文章,70.1%)或市场(4篇文章,9.7%)预测因素。我们对纳入研究进行了叙述性综述,其中某些患者和医院层面的预测因素始终与较高的患者满意度(例如,患者对疼痛管理良好的感知和非营利状态)或较低的患者满意度(例如,种族/族裔少数群体、医院的安全网状态、大都市区)相关。此外,在各项研究中,有几个预测因素与患者满意度的关系不一(例如,教学状态、床位数)。最后,我们发现只有少数研究考察了市场层面预测因素与患者满意度之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Hospital Patient Satisfaction as Measured by HCAHPS: A Systematic Review.通过医院患者医疗服务评价(HCAHPS)衡量的医院患者满意度预测因素:一项系统综述
J Healthc Manag. 2017 Jul/Aug;62(4):272-283. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-15-00050.
2
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Communication skills training for mental health professionals working with people with severe mental illness.针对为重度精神疾病患者提供服务的心理健康专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6(6):CD010006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010006.pub2.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland.影响波兰患者对医疗服务满意度的因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jun 19;31:e948225. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948225.
2
Tools to improve discharge equity: Protocol for the pilot TIDE trial.改善出院公平性的工具:TIDE 试验试点方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Dec 21;43:101419. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101419. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Experiences and challenges of acute coronary syndrome patients in care provision: a qualitative systematic review.急性冠状动脉综合征患者在护理提供方面的经验和挑战:定性系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 17;13(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02578-1.
4
The Impact of Demographics on Child and Parent Ratings of Satisfaction with Hospital Care.人口统计学因素对儿童及家长对医院护理满意度评分的影响
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Feb 12;6(2):e382. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000382. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
5
Listening to Patients Makes Sense: Soliciting and Purposefully Addressing Written Patient Expectations at a Provider Visit Improve Patient Satisfaction.倾听患者意见很有意义:在医疗服务就诊时征求并针对性地回应患者的书面期望可提高患者满意度。
J Patient Exp. 2024 Mar 21;11:23743735241240925. doi: 10.1177/23743735241240925. eCollection 2024.
6
Rate and Predictors of Satisfaction after Noninvasive Facial Cosmetic Procedures: A National Study in Saudi Arabia.非侵入性面部美容手术后的满意度比率及预测因素:沙特阿拉伯的一项全国性研究
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 8;12(2):e5607. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005607. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Differential Effect of Patient- and Provider-Level Factors on Patient Satisfaction Scores in Academic General Internal Medicine Clinics.患者和提供者层面的因素对学术综合内科诊所患者满意度评分的差异影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2261-2267. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08648-3. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
Risks Associated with Quality Care among Hispanic and White Populations-A Cross-Sectional Comparison Study.西班牙裔和白人人群中与优质医疗相关的风险——一项横断面比较研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 19;12(2):250. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020250.
9
Measuring Patient Experience and Patient Satisfaction-How Are We Doing It and Why Does It Matter? A Comparison of European and U.S. American Approaches.衡量患者体验与患者满意度——我们是如何进行的以及为何重要?欧美方法比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;11(6):797. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060797.
10
The geography of Medicare's hospital value-based purchasing in relation to market demographics.医疗保险医院基于价值的采购与市场人口统计学的关系的地理分布。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):844-852. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14141. Epub 2023 Feb 22.