Voice and Swallowing Center, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Voice and Swallowing Center, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 May-Jun;42(3):102888. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102888. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) such as flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) have been deemed high-risk and in some cases restricted, indicating the need for additional personal protective equipment. The aim of this study was to erect and study a protective barrier for FEES.
A PVC cube was constructed to fit over a patient while allowing for upright endoscopy. A plastic drape was fitted over the cube, and the protective barrier was subsequently named the "FEES Box." Three different particulate-generating tasks were carried out: sneezing, coughing, and spraying water from an atomizer bottle. Each task was completed within and without the FEES Box, and particulate was measured with a particle counter. The average particles/L detected during the three tasks, and baseline measurements, were statistically compared.
Without the FEES Box in place, the sneezing and spraying tasks resulted in a statistically significant increase in particles above baseline (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively); coughing particulate never reached levels significantly higher than baseline (p = 0.230). With use of the FEES Box, there was no statistically significant increase in particles above baseline in any of the three tasks.
The FEES Box effectively contained particles generated during sneezes and an atomizer spray. It would also likely mitigate coughing particulate, but coughing did not generate a significant increase in particles above baseline. Further research is warranted to test the efficacy of the FEES Box in containing particulate matter during a complete FEES procedure.
由于 COVID-19 大流行,诸如灵活的吞咽内镜评估(FEES)等气溶胶生成程序被认为是高风险的,在某些情况下受到限制,这表明需要额外的个人防护设备。本研究旨在建立和研究 FEES 的保护屏障。
构建了一个 PVC 立方体,以适合患者,同时允许直立内窥镜检查。在立方体上安装了一个塑料帷幔,随后将保护屏障命名为“FEES 盒”。进行了三项不同的颗粒生成任务:打喷嚏、咳嗽和从喷雾瓶中喷水。每项任务都在 FEES 盒内和盒外完成,并使用粒子计数器测量颗粒。用统计学比较三种任务和基线测量期间每升检测到的平均颗粒数。
没有 FEES 盒的情况下,打喷嚏和喷雾任务导致颗粒数明显高于基线(p < 0.001 和 p = 0.004);咳嗽颗粒从未达到明显高于基线的水平(p = 0.230)。使用 FEES 盒,在三项任务中,颗粒数均未明显高于基线。
FEES 盒可有效控制打喷嚏和喷雾器喷雾产生的颗粒。它也可能减轻咳嗽产生的颗粒,但咳嗽不会导致颗粒明显高于基线。需要进一步研究以测试 FEES 盒在完整的 FEES 程序中控制颗粒物的效果。