• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将人作为促进积极老龄化的资产加以调动:关于同伴志愿服务倡议的多利益相关方视角

Mobilising people as assets for active ageing promotion: a multi-stakeholder perspective on peer volunteering initiatives.

作者信息

Stathi Afroditi, Withall Janet, Agyapong-Badu Sandra, Barrett Eva, Kritz Marlene, Wills Debbie, Thogersen-Ntoumani Cecilie, Fox Kenneth R

机构信息

School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10136-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-10136-2
PMID:33461519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7812118/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful peer volunteering is central to many community-based, active ageing initiatives. This study synthesises the perspectives of a range of stakeholders involved in peer volunteering initiatives and provides recommendations as to how peer volunteers can be effectively mobilised as community assets.

METHODS

An evidence synthesis of qualitative data from (a) the evaluation of ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged), a feasibility trial of a peer volunteering active ageing intervention, and (b) interviews with volunteers and managers of third sector organisations providing peer volunteering programmes. Data were analysed using directed content analysis.

RESULTS

Ten managers, 22 volunteers and 20 ACE participants were interviewed. The analysis identified six main themes, 33 higher and 22 sub themes. Main themes were: (i) Motives, (ii) Benefits, (iii) Skills and Characteristics, (iv) Challenges, (v) Training Needs, (vi) Recruitment and Retention. Altruism, changes in life circumstances, opportunities to reconnect with the community and personal fulfilment were the main reasons for volunteering. Volunteering was described as being personally rewarding, an avenue to acquire new skills and knowledge, and an opportunity for increased social connections and physical activity. Good peer volunteers are committed, reliable, have a good sense of humour, good interpersonal skills and are able to relate to participants. When pairing volunteers with participants, shared interests and geographical proximity are important to consider. Clarity of role, level of time commitment, regular feedback, recognition of effort and strong networks for on-going support are important strategies to facilitate volunteer retention.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study support the value of peer volunteering as a strategy for mobilising community assets in promoting active ageing. To ensure success and longevity, these schemes require appropriate funding and efficient administrative support.

摘要

背景

成功的同伴志愿服务是许多基于社区的积极老龄化倡议的核心。本研究综合了参与同伴志愿服务倡议的一系列利益相关者的观点,并就如何有效调动同伴志愿者作为社区资产提供了建议。

方法

对以下定性数据进行证据综合:(a)对ACE(积极、有联系、有参与度)的评估,这是一项同伴志愿服务积极老龄化干预的可行性试验;(b)对提供同伴志愿服务项目的第三部门组织的志愿者和管理人员的访谈。使用定向内容分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

采访了10名管理人员、22名志愿者和20名ACE参与者。分析确定了六个主要主题、33个更高层次主题和22个子主题。主要主题为:(i)动机;(ii)益处;(iii)技能和特征;(iv)挑战;(v)培训需求;(vi)招募和留用。利他主义、生活环境的变化、与社区重新建立联系的机会和个人成就感是志愿服务的主要原因。志愿服务被描述为个人有回报的、获得新技能和知识的途径,以及增加社交联系和体育活动的机会。优秀的同伴志愿者有奉献精神、可靠、有良好的幽默感、良好的人际交往能力,并且能够与参与者建立联系。在将志愿者与参与者配对时,共同兴趣和地理位置接近是重要的考虑因素。角色明确、时间投入程度、定期反馈、对努力的认可和持续支持的强大网络是促进志愿者留用的重要策略。

结论

本研究结果支持同伴志愿服务作为一种在促进积极老龄化中调动社区资产的策略的价值。为确保成功和长期实施,这些计划需要适当的资金和高效的行政支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a049/7812731/08a97374f255/12889_2020_10136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a049/7812731/08a97374f255/12889_2020_10136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a049/7812731/08a97374f255/12889_2020_10136_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobilising people as assets for active ageing promotion: a multi-stakeholder perspective on peer volunteering initiatives.将人作为促进积极老龄化的资产加以调动:关于同伴志愿服务倡议的多利益相关方视角
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10136-2.
2
Participant and Public Involvement in Refining a Peer-Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: Project ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged).参与者和公众参与完善同伴志愿积极老龄化干预项目:ACE(积极、互联、参与)。
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):362-375. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw148.
3
Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged).同伴志愿积极老龄化干预:ACE(活跃、互联、参与)可行性试验评估。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):571-582. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz003.
4
A peer-volunteer led active ageing programme to prevent decline in physical function in older people at risk of mobility disability (Active, Connected, Engaged [ACE]): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项由同龄志愿者主导的积极老龄化计划,旨在预防有行动障碍风险的老年人身体机能下降(积极、互联、参与[ACE]):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Nov 29;24(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07758-3.
5
"What am I going to be like when I'm that age?": How older volunteers anticipate ageing through home visiting.“当我到那个年龄时,我会是什么样子?”:老年志愿者如何通过家访来预测衰老。
J Aging Stud. 2020 Jun;53:100848. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100848. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
A scoping review of the experiences, benefits, and challenges involved in volunteer work among youth and young adults with a disability.对残疾青年和年轻成年人参与志愿工作的经历、益处及挑战的范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Aug;38(16):1533-46. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107634. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
Evaluating the experiences and impact of the Health Access for Refugees (HARP) project on peer volunteers in Northern England.评估难民健康准入(HARP)项目在英格兰北部同行志愿者身上的经验和影响。
J Community Psychol. 2023 Sep;51(7):2712-2723. doi: 10.1002/jcop.23066. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Qualitative exploration of the impact of employment and volunteering upon the health and wellbeing of African refugees settled in regional Australia: a refugee perspective.定性研究澳大利亚地区非洲难民就业和志愿服务对其健康和福利的影响:难民视角。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;19(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6328-2.
9
Volunteering on Heritage at Risk sites and wellbeing: A qualitative interview study.在濒危遗产地做志愿者与幸福感:一项定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2485-2499. doi: 10.1111/hex.13852. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
10
Social Inclusion and Communality of Volunteering: A Focus Group Study of Older People's Experiences.社会包容与志愿服务的共性:老年人经验的焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095141.

引用本文的文献

1
How to improve support for people with (complex) multiple-problems through social prescribing in a vulnerable neighborhood; professionals', experts-by-experience' and clients' perspectives.如何通过在弱势社区进行社会处方来改善对(复杂)多重问题人群的支持;专业人员、有经验者和客户的观点。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 15;26(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02867-1.
2
Using systems mapping within the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of the ACE active ageing programme in England and Wales.在对英格兰和威尔士的ACE积极老龄化计划进行随机对照试验的过程评估中使用系统映射法。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jun 13;2(1):e000229. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000229. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trial feasibility and process evaluation of a motivationally-embellished group peer led walking intervention in retirement villages using the RE-AIM framework: the residents in action trial (RiAT).使用RE-AIM框架对退休村进行的动机强化型团体同伴引领步行干预的试验可行性和过程评估:居民行动试验(RiAT)
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2019 Jun 17;7(1):202-233. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2019.1629934.
2
Effective Peer Leader Attributes for the Promotion of Walking in Older Adults.促进老年人步行的有效同伴领导属性。
Gerontologist. 2020 Aug 14;60(6):1137-1148. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa014.
3
A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health.
A rapid systematic review of the effect of health or peer volunteers for diabetes self-management: Synthesizing evidence to guide social prescribing.
对健康志愿者或同伴志愿者在糖尿病自我管理中作用的快速系统评价:综合证据以指导社会处方。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;4(12):e0004071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004071. eCollection 2024.
4
Implement social prescribing successfully towards embedding: what works, for whom and in which context? A rapid realist review.成功实施社会处方以实现嵌入:哪些有效,针对谁,以及在什么情况下?快速的现实主义综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):1836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18688-3.
5
Essential factors and key features in designing active aging programs and their outcomes: A narrative review study.设计积极老龄化计划的关键因素和主要特征及其成果:一项叙述性综述研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 May 31;12:169. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_894_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Changes in Volunteering of Older Adults in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Motivations.新冠肺炎疫情期间老年人志愿服务的变化:动机的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;19(22):14755. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214755.
7
The Role of Urban Environments in Promoting Active and Healthy Aging: A Systematic Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches.城市环境在促进积极健康老龄化中的作用:公民科学方法的系统范围综述。
J Urban Health. 2022 Jun;99(3):427-456. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00622-w. Epub 2022 May 19.
基于自我决定理论的健康领域干预研究的元分析:对动机、健康行为、生理和心理健康的影响。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Jun;15(2):214-244. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
Promoting Health-Enhancing Physical Activity: a State-of-the-art Review of Peer-Delivered Interventions.促进促进健康的身体活动:同行提供的干预措施的最新评论。
Curr Obes Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):341-353. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00366-w.
5
Enabling and disabling behaviors in the social environment are associated with physical Activity of older people in the Netherlands.在荷兰,社会环境中的行为促进与抑制与老年人的身体活动相关。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6670-z.
6
Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged).同伴志愿积极老龄化干预:ACE(活跃、互联、参与)可行性试验评估。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):571-582. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz003.
7
Systems approaches to global and national physical activity plans.全球和国家体育活动计划的系统方法。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):162-165. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.220533. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
8
Dyadic interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: systematic review and meta-analysis.促进身体活动和减少久坐行为的对偶干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;13(1):91-109. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1532312. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
9
An evidence-based framework on community-centred approaches for health: England, UK.基于证据的以社区为中心的健康方法框架:英国英格兰
Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):356-366. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax083.
10
Volunteer peer support and befriending for carers of people living with dementia: An exploration of volunteers' experiences.为痴呆症患者照料者提供的志愿者同伴支持与交友服务:对志愿者经历的探索
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Mar;26(2):158-166. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12477. Epub 2017 Jul 24.