Elhage Sharbel A, Thielen Otto N, Otero Javier, Huber Andrew T, Grigg Taylor M, Suddreth Caleb E, Monjimbo George A, Prasad Tanushree, Augenstein Vedra A, Heniford B Todd
Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
Surgery. 2021 Jun;169(6):1400-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
Surgical mesh and hernia repair have come under increasing scrutiny with large amounts of press, Internet, and social media reportage regarding ongoing mesh litigation, recalls, and patient testimonials. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient perceptions of mesh in hernia surgery.
A 16-question survey was given to patients presenting for hernia surgery at a tertiary hernia center by trained data analysts before surgeon interaction.
Two hundred and two patients were surveyed. Patients believed mesh caused complications (45.1%) and reported concerns about mesh (38.2%). Those who performed their own research, females, and patients with recurrent hernias were more likely to have concerns about mesh (P ≤ 0.03). Most patients (81.7%) thought they were at average risk or less for complications; patients with recurrent hernias (versus primary hernias) and incisional hernias (compared with inguinal or umbilical hernias) had more negative outlooks on complications (all P < .05). Recovery expectations varied, but the failed repair and incisional hernia groups were more likely to expect prolonged recovery (>3 months) (all P < .05). After surgeon-directed education and a mesh education handout, all but one patient agreed to and underwent a mesh repair as indicated.
Patients had concerns about mesh and were aware of mesh related complications. Patients performing their own research, as well as females and recurrent hernia patients, had worse perceptions of mesh. Recurrent and incisional hernia patients had greater concerns about complications, recurrence, and recovery. Preoperative education concerning mesh and mesh choice for each operation eased patient anxiety.
随着大量媒体、互联网及社交媒体对正在进行的补片诉讼、召回事件及患者证言的报道,外科补片及疝修补术受到了越来越多的审视。本研究旨在评估患者对疝手术中补片的看法。
在三级疝中心,由经过培训的数据分析师在患者与外科医生交流之前,向前来接受疝手术的患者发放一份包含16个问题的调查问卷。
共对202例患者进行了调查。患者认为补片会引发并发症(45.1%),并表示对补片存在担忧(38.2%)。那些自行进行研究的患者、女性患者以及复发性疝患者更有可能对补片感到担忧(P≤0.03)。大多数患者(81.7%)认为自己发生并发症的风险为平均水平或更低;复发性疝患者(相对于原发性疝患者)和切口疝患者(与腹股沟疝或脐疝患者相比)对并发症的看法更为消极(所有P<.05)。恢复预期各不相同,但修补失败组和切口疝组更有可能预期恢复时间延长(>3个月)(所有P<.05)。在接受外科医生指导的教育并获得一份补片教育手册后,除1例患者外,所有患者均同意并按照指示接受了补片修补术。
患者对补片存在担忧,并知晓与补片相关的并发症。自行进行研究的患者以及女性和复发性疝患者对补片的看法更差。复发性疝和切口疝患者对并发症、复发及恢复更为担忧。针对补片及每种手术的补片选择进行术前教育可缓解患者的焦虑情绪。