Suppr超能文献

美国的学术和社区疝中心网站未能达到可及性的卫生保健读写能力标准。

Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.

机构信息

Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renaissance School, Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Henry Ford Macomb, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02584-z. Epub 2022 Mar 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health literacy is considered the single best predictor of health status. Organizations including the American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have recommended that the readability of patient education materials not exceed the sixth-grade level. Our study focuses on the readability of self-designated hernia centers websites at both academic and community organizations across the United States to determine their ability to dispense patient information at an appropriate reading level.

METHODS

A search was conducted utilizing the Google search engine. The key words "Hernia Center" and "University Hernia Center" were used to identify links to surgical programs within the United States. The following readability tests were conducted via the program: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fox Index (GFI), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score.

RESULTS

Of 96 websites, zero (0%) had fulfilled the recommended reading level in all four tests. The mean test scores for all non-academic centers (n = 50) were as follows: FKGL (11.14 ± 2.68), GFI (14.39 ± 3.07), CLI (9.29 ± 2.48) and SMOG (13.38 ± 2.03). The mean test scores [SK1] for all academic programs (n = 46) were as follows: FKGL (11.7 ± 2.66), GFI (15.01 ± 2.99), CLI (9.34 ± 1.91) and SMOG (13.71 ± 2.02). A one-sample t test was performed to compare the FKGL, GFI, CLI, and SMOG scores for each hernia center to a value of 6.9 (6.9 or less is considered an acceptable reading level) and a p value of 0.001 for all four tests were noted demonstrating statistical significance. The Academic and Community readability scores for both groups were compared to each other with a two-sample t test with a p value of > 0.05 for all four tests and there were no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Neither Academic nor Community hernia centers met the appropriate reading level of sixth-grade or less. Steps moving forward to improve patient comprehension and/or involving with their care should include appropriate reading level material, identification of a patient with a low literacy level with intervention or additional counseling when appropriate, and the addition of adjunct learning materials such as videos.

摘要

背景

健康素养被认为是健康状况的最佳预测指标。包括美国医学协会(AMA)和美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)在内的组织建议,患者教育材料的可读性不应超过六年级水平。我们的研究专注于美国学术和社区组织中自行指定的疝中心网站的可读性,以确定它们在适当的阅读水平下为患者提供信息的能力。

方法

利用谷歌搜索引擎进行了搜索。使用“疝中心”和“大学疝中心”这两个关键词来识别美国外科项目的链接。通过以下程序进行了以下可读性测试:弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)、冈宁-福克斯指数(GFI)、科尔曼-刘指数(CLI)、简单测词糊度(SMOG)和弗莱什阅读舒适度(FRE)得分。

结果

在 96 个网站中,没有一个(0%)在所有四个测试中都达到了建议的阅读水平。所有非学术中心(n=50)的平均测试分数如下:FKGL(11.14±2.68)、GFI(14.39±3.07)、CLI(9.29±2.48)和 SMOG(13.38±2.03)。所有学术项目(n=46)的平均测试分数如下:FKGL(11.7±2.66)、GFI(15.01±2.99)、CLI(9.34±1.91)和 SMOG(13.71±2.02)。对每个疝中心的 FKGL、GFI、CLI 和 SMOG 分数进行了单样本 t 检验,以比较 6.9 的值(6.9 或以下被认为是可接受的阅读水平),所有四个测试的 p 值均为 0.001,均具有统计学意义。用两样本 t 检验比较了两组的学术和社区可读性分数,所有四个测试的 p 值均大于 0.05,没有统计学差异。

结论

学术和社区疝中心都没有达到六年级或以下的适当阅读水平。为了提高患者的理解能力和/或参与他们的护理,应该包括适当的阅读水平材料,识别具有低文化程度的患者,并在适当的时候进行干预或额外的咨询,并添加辅助学习材料,如视频。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验