Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌幸存者监测中伴侣的参与:一项定性研究。

Partners' engagement in surveillance among survivors of colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1289-1296. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3725. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Following treatment of Stage III colorectal cancer, guidelines recommend 3-5 years of surveillance for recurrence. However, over half of the 1.2 million U.S. survivors of colorectal cancer fail to receive guideline-concordant surveillance. In light of growing recognition that members of couples are interdependent and influence each other's health behaviors, we sought to describe, in their own words, the perspectives of spouses/partners on their engagement in patients' surveillance.

METHODS

We conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with 10 survivors of stage III colorectal cancer and their partners, together and separately. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, iteratively coded, and analyzed to identify emergent themes pertaining to partner engagement. Findings were validated through triangulation between study team members and triangulation between dyadic and individual interviews, and through an extensive search of transcripts for disconfirming evidence.

RESULTS

We identified three overarching domains of partner engagement in surveillance. First, psychosocial engagement included promoting patient participation in surveillance, showing care and concern, and attending to partner self-care. Second, information-seeking and dyadic communication focused on gathering information, staying informed about test results, and communicating about surveillance. Third, instrumental engagement referred to any explicit, objective activities such as scheduling appointments, attending appointments, and managing responsibilities at home. Participants shared strategies, examples, and in some cases unmet needs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study generated new, clinically meaningful knowledge about the ways in which partners engage in patients' surveillance. Opportunities to leverage partners as informal resources in surveillance include development of dyadic interventions to help partners engage most effectively.

摘要

目的

在治疗 III 期结直肠癌后,指南建议对复发进行 3-5 年的监测。然而,超过 120 万美国结直肠癌幸存者中有一半以上未能接受符合指南的监测。鉴于越来越多的人认识到夫妻双方相互依存并影响彼此的健康行为,我们试图用配偶/伴侣自己的话来描述他们对参与患者监测的看法。

方法

我们对 10 名 III 期结直肠癌幸存者及其伴侣进行了面对面的半结构化访谈,访谈内容包括患者和伴侣的单独访谈以及共同访谈。访谈内容逐字逐句记录下来,进行迭代编码,并进行分析以确定与伴侣参与相关的主题。通过研究小组成员之间的三角验证、对偶和个体访谈之间的三角验证以及对转录本的广泛搜索以寻找不一致的证据,对研究结果进行了验证。

结果

我们确定了伴侣参与监测的三个总体领域。首先,心理社会参与包括促进患者参与监测、表达关心和关爱,以及关注伴侣的自我保健。其次,信息搜索和对偶沟通侧重于收集信息、了解测试结果,并就监测进行沟通。第三,工具性参与是指任何明确的、客观的活动,如安排预约、参加预约以及管理家庭责任。参与者分享了策略、例子,在某些情况下还分享了未满足的需求。

结论

这项研究提供了关于伴侣参与患者监测的新的、具有临床意义的知识。利用伴侣作为监测中的非正式资源的机会包括开发对偶干预措施,以帮助伴侣最有效地参与。

相似文献

1
Partners' engagement in surveillance among survivors of colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1289-1296. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3725. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
A systematic review of dyadic studies examining relationship quality in couples facing colorectal cancer together.
Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):13-21. doi: 10.1002/pon.4339. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
Unmet needs and relationship challenges of head and neck cancer patients and their spouses.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2016 Jul-Aug;34(4):336-46. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1195901.
9
Navigating sexual health in cancer survivorship: a dyadic perspective.
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5429-5439. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05396-y. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
A qualitative focus group study to identify the needs of survivors of stage II and III colorectal cancer.
Psychooncology. 2016 Dec;25(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1002/pon.3988. Epub 2015 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
3
Understanding and Supporting Informal Cancer Caregivers.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):494-513. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Unmet Emotional Support Needs Among Diverse Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Am Surg. 2020 Jun;86(6):695-702. doi: 10.1177/0003134820923318.
2
Understanding the engagement of key decision support persons in patient decision making around breast cancer treatment.
Cancer. 2019 May 15;125(10):1709-1716. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31956. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving.
Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):1987-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29939. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
Trends in surveillance for resected colorectal cancer, 2001-2009.
Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3525-33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29469. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
6
Adherence to surveillance care guidelines after breast and colorectal cancer treatment with curative intent.
Cancer. 2012 Nov 15;118(22):5644-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27544. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
7
Who cares for family caregivers of patients with cancer?
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Oct;15(5):451-2. doi: 10.1188/11.CJON.451-452.
8
Adapting an in-person patient-caregiver communication intervention to a tailored web-based format.
Psychooncology. 2012 Mar;21(3):336-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.1900. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
9
Study of dyadic communication in couples managing prostate cancer: a longitudinal perspective.
Psychooncology. 2012 Jan;21(1):72-81. doi: 10.1002/pon.1861. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
10
Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):317-39. doi: 10.3322/caac.20081. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验