• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生与放射肿瘤学家针对乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌患者的共享癌症随访护理模式:一项混合方法实施研究的方案

A Shared Cancer Follow-Up Model of Care Between General Practitioners and Radiation Oncologists for Patients With Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.

作者信息

Sandell Tiffany, Schütze Heike, Miller Andrew

机构信息

Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia.

University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(1):e21752. doi: 10.2196/21752.

DOI:10.2196/21752
PMID:33464209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7854032/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rising incidence of cancer and increasing numbers of cancer survivors have resulted in the need to find alternative models of care for cancer follow-up care. The acceptability for follow-up care in general practice is growing, and acceptance increases with shared-care models where oncologists continue to oversee the care. However, a major barrier to this model is the effective exchange of information in real time between oncologists and general practitioners. Improved communication technology plays an important role in the acceptability and feasibility of shared cancer follow-up care.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between patients, general practitioners and radiation oncologists.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods, multisite implementation study exploring shared follow-up care for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy in New South Wales, Australia. This study uses web-based technology to support general practitioners in performing some aspects of routine radiotherapy follow-up care, while being overseen by a radiation oncologist in real time. The study has two phases: Phase 1 is designed to establish the level of agreement between general practitioners and radiation oncologists and Phase 2 is designed to implement shared follow-up care into practice and to evaluate this implementation.

RESULTS

Recruitment of radiation oncologists, patients, and general practitioners commenced in December 2020 and will continue until February 2021. Data collection will occur during 2021, and data will be ready for analysis by the end of 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies have investigated the role of health technologies in supporting communication deficiencies for shared cancer follow-up care. The implementation and evaluation of models of care need to be conducted using a person-centered approach that is responsive to patients' preferences and needs. Should the findings of the study be acceptable and feasible to radiation oncologists, general practitioners, and patients, it can be quickly implemented and expanded to other tumor groups or to medical oncology and hematology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001083987; http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380057.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/21752.

摘要

背景

癌症发病率的上升以及癌症幸存者数量的增加,使得有必要寻找癌症后续护理的替代模式。全科医疗中后续护理的可接受性正在提高,并且在肿瘤学家继续监督护理的共享护理模式下,接受度会进一步增加。然而,这种模式的一个主要障碍是肿瘤学家和全科医生之间实时有效地信息交流。改进的通信技术在共享癌症后续护理的可接受性和可行性方面发挥着重要作用。

目的

本研究的目的是评估患者、全科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间共享癌症后续护理模式的可行性和可接受性。

方法

这是一项混合方法的多地点实施研究,探索在澳大利亚新南威尔士州接受根治性放疗的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌患者的共享后续护理。本研究使用基于网络的技术来支持全科医生进行常规放疗后续护理的某些方面,同时由放射肿瘤学家进行实时监督。该研究有两个阶段:第1阶段旨在确定全科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间的一致程度,第2阶段旨在将共享后续护理付诸实践并评估这一实施情况。

结果

放射肿瘤学家、患者和全科医生的招募于2020年12月开始,将持续到2021年2月。数据收集将在2021年进行,数据将在2021年底准备好进行分析。

结论

很少有研究调查健康技术在支持共享癌症后续护理中的沟通缺陷方面的作用。护理模式的实施和评估需要采用以人为本的方法,以响应患者的偏好和需求。如果该研究的结果对放射肿瘤学家、全科医生和患者来说是可接受且可行的,那么它可以迅速实施并扩展到其他肿瘤组或医学肿瘤学和血液学领域。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12620001083987;http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380057。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/21752。

相似文献

1
A Shared Cancer Follow-Up Model of Care Between General Practitioners and Radiation Oncologists for Patients With Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.全科医生与放射肿瘤学家针对乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌患者的共享癌症随访护理模式:一项混合方法实施研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(1):e21752. doi: 10.2196/21752.
2
Acceptability of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists: A qualitative evaluation.接受全科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间共享癌症随访护理模式:定性评估。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2441-2452. doi: 10.1111/hex.13846. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.癌症患者中用于个性化治疗和护理的患者报告结局测量收集与利用电子健康系统(PROMPT-Care):评估可行性和可接受性的混合方法
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 2;19(10):e330. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8360.
4
Implementing a nurse-enabled, integrated, shared-care model involving specialists and general practitioners in breast cancer post-treatment follow-up: a study protocol for a phase II randomised controlled trial (the EMINENT trial).实施一种护士主导的、整合的、共病管理模式,让专家和全科医生参与乳腺癌治疗后随访:一项 II 期随机对照试验(EMINENT 试验)的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 15;21(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04740-1.
5
Patients' acceptance of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists: A population-based survey using the theoretical Framework of Acceptability.患者对全科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间共同进行癌症随访护理模式的接受度:基于人群的调查,使用可接受性理论框架。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 28;24(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02032-6.
6
Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review.影响共享癌症随访护理转化为临床实践的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e055460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460.
7
A Web-Based Service Delivery Model for Communication Training After Brain Injury: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Prospective, Hybrid Type 2 Implementation-Effectiveness Study.一种基于网络的脑损伤后沟通训练服务提供模式:一项混合方法、前瞻性、混合型2实施-效果研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 9;10(12):e31995. doi: 10.2196/31995.
8
SCORE: Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.SCORE:结直肠癌幸存者的共享护理:一项随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 30;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2245-4.
9
Concordance between General Practitioners and Radiation Oncologists for Cancer Follow-Up Care.全科医生和肿瘤放射科医生在癌症随访护理方面的一致性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1):108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010108.
10
Development and Feasibility Testing of PROMPT-Care, an eHealth System for Collection and Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care: A Study Protocol.PROMPT-Care的开发与可行性测试,这是一个用于收集和使用患者报告结局指标以实现个性化治疗与护理的电子健康系统:一项研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Nov 24;5(4):e227. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6459.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Costs of Surveillance of Early-Stage Breast Cancer by Digital or Traditional Follow-Up Methods: Randomized Crossover Study.比较数字化或传统随访方法对早期乳腺癌进行监测的成本:随机交叉研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Aug 21;11:e58113. doi: 10.2196/58113.
2
Analysis of radiation oncology integration within general practitioners' daily patient care: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.全科医生日常患者护理中放射肿瘤学整合情况分析:德国的一项横断面调查
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02352-1.
3
Acceptability of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists: A qualitative evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
The role of primary care in supporting patients living with and beyond cancer.基层医疗在支持癌症患者生存及康复过程中的作用。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;12(3):261-267. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000369.
3
Patient, general practitioner and oncologist views regarding long-term cancer shared care.
接受全科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间共享癌症随访护理模式:定性评估。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2441-2452. doi: 10.1111/hex.13846. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
Patients' acceptance of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists: A population-based survey using the theoretical Framework of Acceptability.患者对全科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间共同进行癌症随访护理模式的接受度:基于人群的调查,使用可接受性理论框架。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 28;24(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02032-6.
5
Concordance between General Practitioners and Radiation Oncologists for Cancer Follow-Up Care.全科医生和肿瘤放射科医生在癌症随访护理方面的一致性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1):108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010108.
6
Electronic patient-reported monitoring of symptoms during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients: a feasibility study.电子患者报告监测卵巢癌患者随访期间的症状:一项可行性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09817-5.
患者、全科医生和肿瘤学家对癌症长期共享护理的看法。
Fam Pract. 2018 May 23;35(3):323-329. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx105.
4
eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.癌症患者中用于个性化治疗和护理的患者报告结局测量收集与利用电子健康系统(PROMPT-Care):评估可行性和可接受性的混合方法
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 2;19(10):e330. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8360.
5
Shared care involving cancer specialists and primary care providers - What do cancer survivors want?共同照护:癌症专科医生与基层医疗提供者的合作——癌症幸存者想要什么?
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):1081-1087. doi: 10.1111/hex.12551. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
Communication between oncologists and lymphoma survivors during follow-up consultations: A qualitative analysis.肿瘤学家与淋巴瘤幸存者在随访咨询期间的沟通:一项定性分析。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35(5):513-530. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2017.1313352. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Collaboration between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists.
Ann Palliat Med. 2017 Jan;6(1):81-86. doi: 10.21037/apm.2016.11.03.
8
The role of the general practitioner in cancer care: a survey of the patients' perspective.全科医生在癌症护理中的作用:患者视角的调查
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 May;143(5):895-904. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2343-4. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
French women's representations and experiences of the post-treatment management of breast cancer and their perception of the general practitioner's role in follow-up care: A qualitative study.法国女性对乳腺癌治疗后管理的认知和体验,以及她们对全科医生在随访护理中角色的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):788-796. doi: 10.1111/hex.12518. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
10
Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: Practical guide to survivorship care for family physicians.乳腺癌治疗后的随访:家庭医生生存护理实用指南。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):805-811.