Received November 15, 2020 from United Hospital Department of Neurosciences, Allina Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA (GA); Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (XT, SMCK, MGG; ECO); Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (KL); Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (KL). Revision received January 14, 2021; accepted for publication January 14, 2021.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 May-Jun;26(3):326-332. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1877856. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
: Emergency medical service (EMS) transportation after acute stroke is associated with shorter symptom-to-arrival times and more rapid medical attention when compared to patient transportation by private vehicle. : We analyzed data from the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program from 2014 to 2019 among stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients to examine patterns in EMS utilization. : Of 500,829 stroke and TIA patients (mean age 70.9 years, 51.3% women) from 682 participating hospitals during the study period, 60% arrived by EMS. Patients aged 18-64 years vs. ≥65 years (AOR 0.67) were less likely to utilize EMS. Severe stroke patients (AOR 2.29, 95%CI, 2.15-2.44) and hemorrhagic stroke patients vs. ischemic stroke patients (AOR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.43-1.51) were more likely to utilize EMS. Medicare (AOR 1.35, 95% CI, 1.32-1.38) and Medicaid (AOR 1.41, 95% CI, 1.37-1.45) beneficiaries were more likely than privately insured patients to utilize EMS, but no difference was found between no insurance/self-pay patients and privately insured patients on EMS utilization. Overall, there was a decreasing trend in the utilization of EMS (59.6% to 59.3%, p = 0.037). The decreasing trend was identified among ischemic stroke (p < 0.0001) patients but not among TIA (p = 0.89) or hemorrhagic stroke (p = 0.44) patients. There was no observed trend in pre-notification among stroke patients' arrival by EMS across the study period (56.9% to 56.5%, p = 0.99). : Strategies to help increase stroke awareness and utilization of EMS among those with symptoms of stroke should be considered in order to help improve stroke outcomes.
: 与私人交通工具相比,急性中风后使用紧急医疗服务(EMS)进行转运与更短的症状出现到到达时间和更快速的医疗关注相关。: 我们分析了 2014 年至 2019 年期间来自 Paul Coverdell 国家急性中风计划的数据,该计划涉及中风(缺血性和出血性)和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者,以检查 EMS 使用模式。: 在研究期间,来自 682 家参与医院的 500829 名中风和 TIA 患者(平均年龄 70.9 岁,51.3%为女性)中,有 60%通过 EMS 到达。18-64 岁的患者比≥65 岁的患者(AOR 0.67)不太可能使用 EMS。严重中风患者(AOR 2.29,95%CI,2.15-2.44)和出血性中风患者比缺血性中风患者(AOR 1.47,95%CI,1.43-1.51)更有可能使用 EMS。医疗保险(AOR 1.35,95%CI,1.32-1.38)和医疗补助(AOR 1.41,95%CI,1.37-1.45)受益人与私人保险患者相比更有可能使用 EMS,但无保险/自付患者与私人保险患者在使用 EMS 方面没有差异。总体而言,EMS 的使用呈下降趋势(从 59.6%降至 59.3%,p=0.037)。这种下降趋势在缺血性中风患者中(p<0.0001)被发现,但在 TIA(p=0.89)或出血性中风(p=0.44)患者中未被发现。在研究期间,EMS 到达的中风患者的预先通知趋势在所有患者中都没有观察到(从 56.9%降至 56.5%,p=0.99)。: 应该考虑制定策略来提高中风意识和 EMS 在有中风症状的人群中的使用率,以帮助改善中风结局。