• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究,将细菌荧光信息纳入 UPPER/LOWER 伤口感染清单。

A Prospective Multisite Observational Study Incorporating Bacterial Fluorescence Information Into the UPPER/LOWER Wound Infection Checklists.

机构信息

Lion's Gate Hospital, Vancouver Coastal Health, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Wounds. 2020 Nov;32(11):299-308.

PMID:33465044
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The UPPER/LOWER infection checklists look for signs and symptoms of local/superficial infection (UPPER) and deep infection (LOWER) to assist clinicians in identifying and distinguishing between these infection levels, facilitating appropriate treatment. The presence of 3 or more UPPER or LOWER criteria is indicative of infection.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the utility of incorporating real-time bacterial fluorescence imaging into the UPPER/LOWER checklists to enhance identification of infection in wounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, multisite study assessed 43 chronic wounds. Infection was identified in 27 wounds (62.8%) according to the UPPER/LOWER checklist criteria; 3 wounds were positive for both UPPER and LOWER infection, 1 wound was positive for LOWER infection only, and 23 wounds were positive for UPPER infection only. Fluorescence images were taken to detect wounds with high bacterial loads (> 104 CFU/g), indicated by the presence of red or cyan fluorescence.

RESULTS

Red or cyan fluorescence from bacteria was observed in 88% of wounds (n = 38); all wounds positive for UPPER/LOWER were also positive for bacterial fluorescence. In 18 (41.9%) of the 43 wounds, fluorescence information added a third check to the UPPER/LOWER threshold, turning a negative diagnosis into a positive diagnosis of infection. Bacterial load was detected in 22/27 wounds swabbed, 17 of which exhibited heavy growth; in all wounds with detectable bacterial load, fluorescence signal was observed (positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 83%). Using microbiology as ground truth, inclusion of fluorescence information as an additional item in the checklists increased the sensitivity of the UPPER/LOWER checklist from 82% to 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the UPPER/LOWER checklist and fluorescence imaging work in a complementary manner to effectively identify wounds with high bacterial burden at the point-of-care.

摘要

简介

UPPER/LOWER 感染检查表旨在寻找局部/浅表感染(UPPER)和深部感染(LOWER)的迹象和症状,以帮助临床医生识别和区分这两种感染级别,从而提供适当的治疗。出现 3 个或更多 UPPER 或 LOWER 标准表明存在感染。

目的

本研究评估了将实时细菌荧光成像纳入 UPPER/LOWER 检查表中以增强对伤口感染识别的效用。

材料和方法

本前瞻性、多中心研究评估了 43 例慢性伤口。根据 UPPER/LOWER 检查表标准,27 个伤口被确定为感染(62.8%);3 个伤口 UPPER 和 LOWER 均呈阳性,1 个伤口仅呈 LOWER 感染阳性,23 个伤口仅呈 UPPER 感染阳性。荧光图像用于检测细菌负荷较高(>104 CFU/g)的伤口,表现为红色或青色荧光。

结果

观察到 88%(n=38)的伤口存在来自细菌的红色或青色荧光;所有 UPPER/LOWER 阳性的伤口也呈细菌荧光阳性。在 43 个伤口中,18 个(41.9%)的荧光信息为 UPPER/LOWER 阈值增加了第三个检查,将阴性诊断转变为感染的阳性诊断。在 27 个进行拭子取样的伤口中,有 22 个检测到细菌负荷,其中 17 个显示重度生长;在所有可检测到细菌负荷的伤口中,均观察到荧光信号(阳性预测值=100%,阴性预测值=83%)。使用微生物学作为金标准,将荧光信息作为检查表中的附加项目纳入,可将 UPPER/LOWER 检查表的灵敏度从 82%提高到 95%。

结论

这些结果表明,UPPER/LOWER 检查表和荧光成像以互补的方式工作,可有效识别即时护理点具有高细菌负担的伤口。

相似文献

1
A Prospective Multisite Observational Study Incorporating Bacterial Fluorescence Information Into the UPPER/LOWER Wound Infection Checklists.一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究,将细菌荧光信息纳入 UPPER/LOWER 伤口感染清单。
Wounds. 2020 Nov;32(11):299-308.
2
Point-of-care fluorescence imaging predicts the presence of pathogenic bacteria in wounds: a clinical study.即时护理荧光成像预测伤口中病原菌的存在:一项临床研究。
J Wound Care. 2017 Aug 2;26(8):452-460. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.8.452.
3
Real-time bacterial fluorescence imaging accurately identifies wounds with moderate-to-heavy bacterial burden.实时细菌荧光成像可准确识别细菌负荷为中度至重度的伤口。
J Wound Care. 2019 Jun 2;28(6):346-357. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.6.346.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging for the Detection of Bacterial Burden in Wounds: Results from the 350-Patient Fluorescence Imaging Assessment and Guidance Trial.即时荧光成像检测伤口细菌负荷的诊断准确性:来自 350 例患者的荧光成像评估和指导试验的结果。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 Mar;10(3):123-136. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1272. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
Efficacy of an imaging device at identifying the presence of bacteria in wounds at a plastic surgery outpatients clinic.一种成像设备在整形外科门诊伤口细菌检测中的效能。
J Wound Care. 2018 Jan 2;27(1):20-26. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.1.20.
6
Fluorescence imaging guided dressing change frequency during negative pressure wound therapy: a case series.负压伤口治疗期间荧光成像引导的换药频率:病例系列
J Wound Care. 2019 Sep 1;28(Sup9):S28-S37. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup9.S28.
7
Efficacy of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device in an outpatient wound care clinic: a pilot study.一种细菌荧光成像设备在门诊伤口护理诊所的疗效:一项试点研究。
J Wound Care. 2019 Jul 2;28(7):438-443. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.7.438.
8
Bacterial autofluorescence in infected perineal wounds: A prospective cohort study.感染性会阴伤口中的细菌自发荧光:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Jan;105(1):115831. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115831. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
9
Use of a bacterial fluorescence imaging system to target wound debridement and accelerate healing: a pilot study.利用细菌荧光成像系统靶向清创并加速愈合:一项初步研究。
J Wound Care. 2020 Jul 1;29(Sup7):S44-S52. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup7.S44.
10
Use of a fluorescence imaging device to detect elevated bacterial loads, enhance antimicrobial stewardship, and increase communication across inpatient complex wound care teams.使用荧光成像设备来检测细菌负荷增加,增强抗菌药物管理,并加强住院复杂伤口护理团队之间的沟通。
Wounds. 2022 Aug;34(8):201-208. doi: 10.25270/wnds/21076. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in chronic wound's microbiology.系统评价和荟萃分析在慢性伤口微生物学诊断试验中的准确性。
Int Wound J. 2024 Sep;21(9):e70063. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70063.
2
Determination of the Course of Cyan Fluorescence of with a Handheld Bacterial Imaging Device.使用手持式细菌成像设备测定[物质名称]的青色荧光过程
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(14):1474. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141474.
3
Skin Pigmentation Impacts the Clinical Diagnosis of Wound Infection: Imaging of Bacterial Burden to Overcome Diagnostic Limitations.
皮肤色素沉着影响伤口感染的临床诊断:细菌负荷成像以克服诊断局限性。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):1045-1055. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01584-8. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Fluorescence - modern method of the diagnosis of chronic wounds on the example of venous leg ulcer.荧光——以腿部静脉溃疡为例的慢性伤口诊断现代方法。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2023 Feb;40(1):66-71. doi: 10.5114/ada.2022.119419. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Point-of-care fluorescence imaging reveals extent of bacterial load in diabetic foot ulcers.即时荧光成像揭示糖尿病足溃疡的细菌负荷程度。
Int Wound J. 2023 Feb;20(2):554-566. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14080. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
6
Uncovering the high prevalence of bacterial burden in surgical site wounds with point-of-care fluorescence imaging.利用即时荧光成像技术发现手术部位伤口中细菌负担的高发生率。
Int Wound J. 2022 Oct;19(6):1438-1448. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13737. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of the invasive extension of bacteria (cellulitis) from chronic wounds utilising point-of-care fluorescence imaging.利用即时荧光成像技术诊断和治疗慢性伤口处细菌(蜂窝织炎)的侵袭性延伸。
Int Wound J. 2022 Aug;19(5):996-1008. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13696. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
Are Semi-Quantitative Clinical Cultures Inadequate? Comparison to Quantitative Analysis of 1053 Bacterial Isolates from 350 Wounds.半定量临床培养是否不足?与350处伤口的1053株细菌分离株定量分析的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 12;11(7):1239. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071239.
9
Guidelines for Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging for Detection of Wound Bacterial Burden Based on Delphi Consensus.基于德尔菲共识的即时护理荧光成像检测伤口细菌负荷指南
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;11(7):1219. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071219.
10
Bacterial Autofluorescence Digital Imaging Guides Treatment in Stage 4 Pelvic Pressure Injuries: A Preliminary Case Series.细菌自发荧光数字成像指导4期盆腔压力性损伤的治疗:初步病例系列
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 7;11(5):839. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050839.