Dept of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States of America.
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245074. eCollection 2021.
The ecosystem services concept has come into wide use in conservation and natural resource management, partly due to its appeal as an anthropocentric rationale for protecting and restoring nature. Proponents of the ecosystem services concept expect that presenting these arguments alongside biodiversity arguments should lead to a broader base of support for conservation. This raises the question of whether support for activities that ensure ecosystem service provision relates to different sets of core values, or environmental attitudes, than support for biodiversity protection. We surveyed adult Australians to evaluate the influence of values and attitudes on willingness to pay for different habitat restoration outcomes. We hypothesized that when restoration is framed with an anthropocentric rationale (such as ecosystem service provision), support for restoration would align more strongly with anthropocentric or self-centered values and attitudes. Specifically, we tested if preference for ecosystem service benefits over biodiversity attributes, as indicated by willingness to pay in different restoration scenarios, is more strongly associated with self-enhancing (Egoistic) than self-transcending (Altruistic and Biospheric) values, and more associated with a pro-use attitude towards nature (Utilization) than an anti-use attitude (Preservation). We found that support for habitat restoration is generally based on ecocentric values and attitudes, but that positive associations between pro-environmental behavior and Egoistic values emerge when emphasis is placed on ecosystem service outcomes. Individuals scoring higher on Egoistic/Utilization metrics were also more likely to anticipate disservices from restoration. Attitudes predicted behavioral intention (willingness to pay) better than core values. Our results support the notion that the ecosystem services concept garners nontraditional backers and broadens the appeal of ecological restoration.
生态系统服务概念在保护和自然资源管理中得到了广泛应用,部分原因是它作为一种保护和恢复自然的人类中心主义理据具有吸引力。生态系统服务概念的支持者期望,将这些论点与生物多样性论点一起提出,应该会为保护提供更广泛的支持基础。这就提出了一个问题,即支持确保生态系统服务提供的活动是否与支持生物多样性保护的核心价值观或环境态度不同。我们调查了澳大利亚成年人,以评估价值观和态度对为不同生境恢复结果支付意愿的影响。我们假设,当恢复被赋予人类中心主义理据(如生态系统服务提供)时,对恢复的支持将与人类中心主义或以自我为中心的价值观和态度更加一致。具体来说,我们测试了在不同的恢复情景下,对生态系统服务利益的偏好是否比生物多样性属性更强烈地与自我增强(自我中心)而不是自我超越(利他主义和生态中心)的价值观相关,以及是否与对自然的亲用态度(利用)比反用态度(保护)更相关。我们发现,对生境恢复的支持通常基于生态中心主义的价值观和态度,但当强调生态系统服务成果时,与亲环境行为的积极关联就会出现自我中心主义价值观。在自我中心主义/利用指标上得分较高的个体也更有可能预测到恢复带来的不利影响。态度比核心价值观更能预测行为意图(支付意愿)。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即生态系统服务概念吸引了非传统的支持者,并扩大了生态恢复的吸引力。