• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何控制啮齿类动物的行为研究——不要将人类的想法投射到它们身上。

How to Control Behavioral Studies for Rodents-Don't Project Human Thoughts onto Them.

机构信息

Donders Centre for Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

出版信息

eNeuro. 2021 Jan 29;8(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0456-20.2021. Print 2021 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0456-20.2021
PMID:33468539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7877469/
Abstract

In neuroscience research, we often use behavior as an easy tool and assume a straightforward relationship between memory and behavior. However, many factors are often not accounted for and need to be considered when interpreting a behavioral outcome. This opinion article will discuss factors in rodent studies such as handling and how the animal views the world, that will affect whether memory leads to a certain behavior.

摘要

在神经科学研究中,我们常常用行为作为一种简单的工具,并假定记忆和行为之间存在直接的关系。然而,在解释行为结果时,往往有许多因素没有考虑在内,需要加以考虑。本文观点将讨论啮齿动物研究中的一些因素,如操作和动物对世界的看法,这些因素会影响记忆是否导致特定的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7877469/4e90fccbbcef/SN-ENUJ210014F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7877469/ad6fe0480139/SN-ENUJ210014F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7877469/4e90fccbbcef/SN-ENUJ210014F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7877469/ad6fe0480139/SN-ENUJ210014F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7877469/4e90fccbbcef/SN-ENUJ210014F002.jpg

相似文献

1
How to Control Behavioral Studies for Rodents-Don't Project Human Thoughts onto Them.如何控制啮齿类动物的行为研究——不要将人类的想法投射到它们身上。
eNeuro. 2021 Jan 29;8(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0456-20.2021. Print 2021 Jan-Feb.
2
Rodent and fly models in behavioral neuroscience: An evaluation of methodological advances, comparative research, and future perspectives.行为神经科学中的啮齿动物和果蝇模型:方法学进展、比较研究及未来展望评估
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jan;120:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
Ethological approach to social isolation effects in behavioral studies of laboratory rodents.行为学方法在实验室啮齿动物行为研究中对社会隔离效应的应用
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Apr 2;341:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
4
Social learning of food preferences in rodents: rapid appetitive learning.啮齿动物对食物偏好的社会学习:快速的食欲学习。
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2003 Feb;Chapter 8:Unit 8.5D. doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0805ds21.
5
SEXRAT MALE: A smartphone and tablet application to annotate and process live sexual behavior in male rodents.雄鼠性行为实时标注与处理的智能手机和平板应用
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 May 15;320:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
6
Rodent empathy and affective neuroscience.啮齿动物共情与情感神经科学。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):1864-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
7
Female rodents in behavioral neuroscience: Narrative review on the methodological pitfalls.行为神经科学中的雌性啮齿动物:方法学陷阱的叙述性综述
Physiol Behav. 2024 Oct 1;284:114645. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114645. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Animal Use in Neurobiological Research.神经生物学研究中的动物使用
Neuroscience. 2020 May 1;433:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.02.049. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
9
Ethological and multi-behavioral analysis of learning and memory performance in laboratory rodent models.实验室啮齿动物模型学习与记忆表现的行为学及多行为分析
Neurosci Res. 2018 Oct;135:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
Refinements to rodent head fixation and fluid/food control for neuroscience.啮齿动物头部固定和神经科学中的液体/食物控制的改进。
J Neurosci Methods. 2022 Nov 1;381:109705. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109705. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Organoids to Model Sex Differences in the Human Brain.利用类器官模拟人类大脑中的性别差异。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 Jun 4;4(5):100343. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100343. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Roadbumps at the Crossroads of Integrating Behavioral and Approaches for Neurotoxicity Assessment.整合行为学与神经毒性评估方法交叉路口的障碍
Front Toxicol. 2022 Feb 25;4:812863. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.812863. eCollection 2022.
3
Cognitive Dysfunction After Analgesia and Sedation: Out of the Operating Room and Into the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardized and reproducible measurement of decision-making in mice.标准化和可重复的小鼠决策测量。
Elife. 2021 May 20;10:e63711. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63711.
2
The circadian dynamics of the hippocampal transcriptome and proteome is altered in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy.在实验性颞叶癫痫中,海马转录组和蛋白质组的昼夜动态发生改变。
Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 9;6(41). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat5979. Print 2020 Oct.
3
The Brain-Cognitive Behavior Problem: A Retrospective.脑认知行为问题:回顾
镇痛镇静后的认知功能障碍:走出手术室,进入儿科重症监护病房。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug 16;15:713668. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.713668. eCollection 2021.
4
Novel competition test for food rewards reveals stable dominance status in adult male rats.新型食物奖励竞争测试揭示成年雄性大鼠稳定的支配地位。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 16;11(1):14599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93818-0.
eNeuro. 2020 Aug 7;7(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0069-20.2020. Print 2020 Jul/Aug.
4
A clash of : Anthropomorphism in behavioral neuroscience.一种冲突:行为神经科学中的拟人论。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Nov 28;42:e229. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001237.
5
The Life of Behavior.行为的一生。
Neuron. 2019 Oct 9;104(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.017.
6
On the interpretation of results obtained in singly housed animals.关于对单笼饲养动物所获结果的解读。
Epilepsia. 2019 Oct;60(10):2013-2015. doi: 10.1111/epi.16347. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
7
Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity.自发性行为驱动多维全脑活动。
Science. 2019 Apr 19;364(6437):255. doi: 10.1126/science.aav7893. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
8
Pheromone-Induced Odor Associative Fear Learning in Rats.信息素诱导的大鼠气味联想性恐惧学习
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 7;8(1):17701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36023-w.
9
The Role of Learning in Threat Imminence and Defensive Behaviors.学习在威胁紧迫性和防御行为中的作用。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Dec;24:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task.在一项平衡的“去/不去”判断偏差任务中,巴甫洛夫对学习的影响在大鼠和小鼠之间存在差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jul 28;331:214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 23.