Parast Layla, Tolpadi Anagha A, Teno Joan M, Elliott Marc N, Price Rebecca Anhang
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):961-969. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06490-x. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
Little is known about the current quality of care for hospice cancer patients and how it varies across hospice programs in the USA.
To examine hospice care experiences among decedents with a primary cancer diagnosis and their family caregivers, comparing quality across settings of hospice care.
We analyzed data from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Hospice Survey (32% response rate). Top-box outcomes (0-100) were calculated overall and by care setting, adjusting for survey mode and patient case mix.
Two hundred seventeen thousand five hundred ninety-six caregiver respondents whose family member had a primary cancer diagnosis and died in 2017 or 2018 while receiving hospice care from 2,890 hospices nationwide.
Outcomes (0-100 scale) included 8 National Quality Forum-endorsed quality measures, as well as responses to 4 survey questions assessing whether needs were met for specific symptoms (pain, dyspnea, constipation, anxiety/sadness).
Quality measure scores ranged from 74.9 (Getting Hospice Care Training measure) to 89.5 (Treating Family Member with Respect measure). The overall score for Getting Help for Symptoms was 75.1 with item scores within this measure ranging from 60.6 (getting needed help for feelings of anxiety or sadness) to 84.5 (getting needed help for pain). Measure scores varied significantly across settings and differences were large in magnitude, with caregivers of decedents who received care in a nursing home (NH) or assisted living facility (ALF) setting consistently reporting poorer quality of care.
Important opportunities exist to improve hospice care for symptom palliation and providing training for caregivers when their family members are at home or in an ALF setting. Efforts to improve care for cancer patients in the NH and ALF setting are especially needed.
目前对于临终关怀癌症患者的护理质量以及美国各临终关怀项目之间的差异了解甚少。
研究患有原发性癌症诊断的死者及其家庭护理人员的临终关怀护理经历,比较不同临终关怀护理环境下的护理质量。
我们分析了医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估临终关怀调查的数据(回复率为32%)。总体和按护理环境计算了顶格结果(0 - 100),并对调查方式和患者病例组合进行了调整。
217,596名护理人员受访者,其家庭成员患有原发性癌症诊断,并于2017年或2018年在接受全国2,890家临终关怀机构的临终关怀护理时死亡。
结果(0 - 100分制)包括8项经国家质量论坛认可的质量指标,以及对4个调查问题的回答,这些问题评估特定症状(疼痛、呼吸困难、便秘、焦虑/悲伤)的需求是否得到满足。
质量指标分数从74.9(接受临终关怀护理培训指标)到89.5(尊重家庭成员指标)不等。症状求助的总体得分为75.1,该指标内的项目得分从60.6(获得焦虑或悲伤情绪所需帮助)到84.5(获得疼痛所需帮助)不等。指标分数在不同环境下差异显著,且差异幅度较大,在养老院(NH)或辅助生活设施(ALF)环境中接受护理的死者的护理人员一直报告护理质量较差。
在改善临终关怀以缓解症状以及在家庭成员在家或在ALF环境中时为护理人员提供培训方面存在重要机遇。尤其需要努力改善NH和ALF环境中癌症患者的护理。