Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2483-2490. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18883. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
Assisted living (AL) community caregivers are known to report lower quality of hospice care. However, little is known about hospice providers serving AL residents and factors that may contribute to, and explain, differences in quality. We examined the association between hospice providers' AL patient-day volume and their quality ratings based on Hospice Item Set (HIS) and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospice Surveys.
This cross-sectional study employed information from the Medicare Compare website and Medicare claims data. Medicare-eligible AL residents were identified using previously validated methods and merged with hospice claims. Linear probability models adjusting for county fixed effects were used to examine the association between hospice provider AL volume, measured as the share of annual hospice patient days from AL residents, and quality measures obtained from HIS and CAHPS. Models controlled for hospice providers' profit status and daily patient census.
Higher AL-volume hospice providers were 7 percentage points more likely to have caregivers reporting lower median scores on domains of pain assessment, dyspnea treatment, and emotional support. Their caregivers also reported lower scores in team communications and training family to provide care. Higher AL-volume hospice providers also were 5 percentage points less likely to get higher aggregated scores from all CAHPS domains and 7 percentage points less likely to have higher HIS composite scores.
Hospice providers serving higher volumes of AL patient days had lower quality scores. In order to identify targeted opportunities for quality improvement, research is needed to understand why lower quality providers are concentrated in the AL market.
辅助生活(AL)社区护理人员报告的临终关怀质量较低。然而,对于为 AL 居民提供临终关怀的服务提供商以及可能导致和解释质量差异的因素知之甚少。我们研究了临终关怀提供者的 AL 患者日量与基于临终关怀项目集(HIS)和医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)临终关怀调查的质量评分之间的关联。
这项横断面研究使用了 Medicare Compare 网站和医疗保险索赔数据的信息。使用先前验证的方法确定符合医疗保险资格的 AL 居民,并将其与临终关怀索赔合并。使用调整了县固定效应的线性概率模型来检验 hospice 提供者 AL 量(以来自 AL 居民的年度 hospice 患者天数的份额衡量)与从 HIS 和 CAHPS 获得的质量测量之间的关联。模型控制了 hospice 提供者的盈利状况和每日患者普查。
AL 量较高的 hospice 提供者更有可能让护理人员报告疼痛评估、呼吸困难治疗和情感支持方面的中位数得分较低。他们的护理人员在团队沟通和培训家属提供护理方面的得分也较低。AL 量较高的 hospice 提供者获得所有 CAHPS 领域的综合评分较高的可能性也低 5 个百分点,获得 HIS 综合评分较高的可能性也低 7 个百分点。
为更高数量的 AL 患者提供服务的临终关怀提供者的质量评分较低。为了确定有针对性的质量改进机会,需要研究为什么较低质量的提供者集中在 AL 市场。