Suppr超能文献

用于 UPPS-P 和短 UPPS-P 冲动行为量表的效度量表的开发和验证。

Development and Validation of a Validity Scale for Use with the UPPS-P and Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scales.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2021 Nov-Dec;103(6):752-761. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1866588. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Abstract

Two of the most widely used self-report measures of impulsivity are the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale and its shortened version, the SUPPS-P, which currently are limited by their inability to detect careless and/or random responding. The present study develops and cross-validates an inconsistency scale for use with the UPPS-P and SUPPS-P in order to accurately screen for data quality and better detect invalid responding. A total of 443 participants were recruited from Amazon's MTurk online data collection service to serve as the derivation sample and 231 undergraduates were recruited to serve as the cross-validation sample. The inconsistency scale demonstrated good classification accuracy in differentiating between genuine and random protocols and moderated the relationships between the UPPS-P/SUPPS-P and a criterion measure of impulsivity, the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11). Thus, the inconsistency scale shows promise as an indicator of variable response inconsistency for use with both the UPPS-P and SUPPS-P in community and undergraduate research samples.

摘要

两种最广泛使用的冲动性自评量表是 UPPS-P 冲动行为量表及其缩写版 SUPPS-P,但目前它们都无法检测到粗心和/或随机反应。本研究开发并交叉验证了 UPPS-P 和 SUPPS-P 的不一致性量表,以准确筛选数据质量并更好地检测无效反应。共有 443 名参与者从亚马逊的 MTurk 在线数据收集服务中招募,作为推导样本,231 名本科生被招募作为交叉验证样本。不一致性量表在区分真实和随机协议方面表现出良好的分类准确性,并调节了 UPPS-P/SUPPS-P 与冲动性的标准衡量标准,即巴瑞特冲动量表-11(BIS-11)之间的关系。因此,不一致性量表有望成为社区和本科生研究样本中 UPPS-P 和 SUPPS-P 中变量反应不一致的指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验