Batshaw M L, Plotnick L P, Petty B G, Woolf P K, Mellits E D
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 24;318(12):741-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198803243181204.
We studied promotions at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine to determine whether clinician-teachers are less likely to be promoted or are promoted later in life than researchers and whether those who are promoted have more articles published than those who are not promoted. Over a five-year period, 93 percent of candidates for the rank of associate professor and 79 percent of the candidates for the rank of professor were promoted. There were no significant differences between clinical and research faculty members in terms of the probability that they would be promoted or their age at promotion to either associate professor or professor. Despite these findings, the responses to a questionnaire indicated that former faculty members perceived clinician-teachers as less likely than researchers to be promoted. Those who were promoted had had about twice as many articles published in peer-reviewed journals as those who were not promoted. We recommend improved counseling of medical school faculty members and more extensive discussion of the criteria for promotion and the chances of academic success.
我们对约翰霍普金斯大学医学院的晋升情况进行了研究,以确定临床教师相比研究人员是否晋升可能性更低或在职业生涯后期才获得晋升,以及获得晋升者发表的文章数量是否比未获晋升者更多。在五年时间里,93%的副教授职级候选人以及79%的教授职级候选人获得了晋升。临床教师和研究教师在晋升概率或晋升为副教授或教授时的年龄方面没有显著差异。尽管有这些发现,但问卷调查的结果显示,前教职员工认为临床教师相比研究人员晋升可能性更低。获得晋升者在同行评审期刊上发表的文章数量约为未获晋升者的两倍。我们建议改善对医学院教职员工的咨询服务,并更广泛地讨论晋升标准和学术成功的机会。