• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价在接受常规药物治疗的患者中,益生菌给药后主要功能性消化不良症状的改善情况。

Evaluation of main functional dyspepsia symptoms after probiotic administration in patients receiving conventional pharmacological therapies.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, 9304University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Gastroenterology Unit, Avellino Hospital, Avellino, Italy.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520982657. doi: 10.1177/0300060520982657.

DOI:10.1177/0300060520982657
PMID:33472489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7829611/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) are the two main forms of functional dyspepsia (FD). Probiotics are a promising therapy for FD, but current data remains heterogeneous. This work aims to evaluate a probiotic combination of LR04 (DSM 16605), LPS01 (DSM 21980), LP01 (LMG P-21021), and subsp. LDD01 (DMS 22106), alone or together with other pharmacological therapies, for clinical improvement of symptoms associated with FD.

METHODS

Patients with FD were enrolled and divided into two groups: PDS and EPS. Probiotic alone or combined with prokinetics, antacids, or proton-pump-inhibitors were administered for 30 days. A progressive-score scale was used to evaluate symptoms in all patients at the beginning of the trial and at 15 days after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

A cohort of 2676 patients were enrolled (1 357 with PDS; 1 319 with EPS). All patients showed significant improvements in dyspeptic symptoms following treatment. In patients with PDS, probiotic alone resulted in the lowest prevalence of symptoms following treatment, while patients with EPS showed no clear between-treatment differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Dyspeptic symptoms were reduced following treatment in all patients.

摘要

目的

餐后不适综合征(PDS)和上腹疼痛综合征(EPS)是功能性消化不良(FD)的两种主要形式。益生菌是治疗 FD 的一种很有前途的方法,但目前的数据仍然存在异质性。本研究旨在评估 LR04(DSM 16605)、LPS01(DSM 21980)、LP01(LMG P-21021)和 subsp. LDD01(DMS 22106)四种益生菌组合单独或与其他药物治疗联合应用,对 FD 相关症状的临床改善作用。

方法

纳入 FD 患者,并分为 PDS 和 EPS 两组。单独使用益生菌或联合使用促动力药、抗酸药或质子泵抑制剂治疗 30 天。在试验开始时和治疗结束后 15 天,所有患者均使用渐进评分量表评估症状。

结果

共纳入 2676 例患者(PDS 患者 1357 例,EPS 患者 1319 例)。所有患者的消化不良症状在治疗后均有显著改善。在 PDS 患者中,单独使用益生菌治疗后症状的发生率最低,而 EPS 患者之间的治疗差异不明显。

结论

所有患者的消化不良症状在治疗后均有所减轻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/9d0b1b9612e5/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/88d2cd021195/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/57704ff44069/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/9d0b1b9612e5/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/88d2cd021195/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/57704ff44069/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/9d0b1b9612e5/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of main functional dyspepsia symptoms after probiotic administration in patients receiving conventional pharmacological therapies.评价在接受常规药物治疗的患者中,益生菌给药后主要功能性消化不良症状的改善情况。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520982657. doi: 10.1177/0300060520982657.
2
The innovative potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LR06, Lactobacillus pentosus LPS01, Lactobacillus plantarum LP01, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii Subsp. delbrueckii LDD01 to restore the "gastric barrier effect" in patients chronically treated with PPI: a pilot study.罗伊氏乳杆菌 LR06、戊糖片球菌 LPS01、植物乳杆菌 LP01 和德氏乳杆菌亚种保加利亚乳杆菌 LDD01 恢复慢性 PPI 治疗患者“胃屏障效应”的创新潜力:一项初步研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;46 Suppl:S18-26. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318267b55d.
3
Rome III functional dyspepsia subdivision in PDS and EPS: recognizing postprandial symptoms reduces overlap.罗马III型功能性消化不良在餐后不适综合征和上腹痛综合征中的细分:认识餐后症状可减少重叠。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Aug;27(8):1069-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12585.
4
Discriminant value of Rome III questionnaire in dyspeptic patients.罗马 III 问卷在消化不良患者中的鉴别价值。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):129-33. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.77244.
5
Current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of functional dyspepsia.功能性消化不良的治疗选择:现状和进展。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020 Feb;21(3):365-376. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1707805. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
[Functional Dyspepsia].[功能性消化不良]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 25;73(2):77-83. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2019.73.2.77.
7
Analysis of Postprandial Symptom Patterns in Subgroups of Patients With Rome III or Rome IV Functional Dyspepsia.罗马 III 或罗马 IV 功能性消化不良亚组患者餐后症状模式分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr;18(4):838-846.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.053. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Pathophysiological Abnormalities in Functional Dyspepsia Subgroups According to the Rome III Criteria.根据罗马III标准,功能性消化不良亚组的病理生理异常。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;112(1):132-140. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.499. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
9
Therapeutic options for functional dyspepsia.功能性消化不良的治疗选择。
Dig Dis. 2014;32(3):230-4. doi: 10.1159/000358111. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
10
Prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux in patients with functional dyspepsia based on the Rome III criteria.基于罗马 III 标准的功能性消化不良患者病理性食管酸反流的患病率和症状模式。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;105(12):2626-31. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.351. Epub 2010 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary microbes and functional dyspepsia: modulating the gut microecology for therapeutic benefit.饮食中的微生物与功能性消化不良:调节肠道微生态以获得治疗益处。
Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 19;12:1625987. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1625987. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical efficacy of probiotics in improving intestinal mucosal permeability for functional dyspepsia patients with anxiety.益生菌对伴有焦虑的功能性消化不良患者改善肠黏膜通透性的临床疗效。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1614705. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1614705. eCollection 2025.
3
HP7 Improves Gastric Emptying by Modulating Digestive Factors in a Loperamide-Induced Functional Dyspepsia Mouse Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Stability and Viability of Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria: A Review.微囊化益生菌的结构稳定性与生存能力:综述
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013 Nov;12(6):614-628. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12030.
2
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Functional Dyspepsia.功能性消化不良中的肠道微生物群失调
Microorganisms. 2020 May 8;8(5):691. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8050691.
3
Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.益生元和益生菌治疗功能性消化不良的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
HP7通过调节洛哌丁胺诱导的功能性消化不良小鼠模型中的消化因子来改善胃排空。
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025 Mar 11;35:e2412035. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2412.12035.
4
Relative Frequency of Gastrointestinal Functional Disorders in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Based on Rome IV: A Case-Control Study.基于罗马IV标准的炎症性肠病患者胃肠道功能障碍的相对频率:一项病例对照研究
Adv Biomed Res. 2024 Jul 29;13:43. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_369_23. eCollection 2024.
5
Research Progress for Probiotics Regulating Intestinal Flora to Improve Functional Dyspepsia: A Review.益生菌调节肠道菌群改善功能性消化不良的研究进展:综述
Foods. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):151. doi: 10.3390/foods13010151.
6
Gut Microbiome-Brain Alliance: A Landscape View into Mental and Gastrointestinal Health and Disorders.肠道微生物群-大脑联盟:心理和胃肠道健康与疾病的全景图。
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023 May 17;14(10):1717-1763. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00127. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Food, Dietary Patterns, or Is Eating Behavior to Blame? Analyzing the Nutritional Aspects of Functional Dyspepsia.食物、饮食模式还是饮食行为?功能性消化不良的营养方面分析。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 22;15(6):1544. doi: 10.3390/nu15061544.
8
Probiotics in Functional Dyspepsia.功能性消化不良中的益生菌
Microorganisms. 2023 Jan 31;11(2):351. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020351.
9
Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders with Psychiatric Symptoms: Involvement of the Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis in the Pathophysiology and Case Management.伴有精神症状的功能性胃肠疾病:微生物群-肠-脑轴在病理生理学及病例管理中的作用
Microorganisms. 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2199. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112199.
10
Effect of Kvass on Improving Functional Dyspepsia in Rats.克瓦斯对改善大鼠功能性消化不良的作用。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 28;2022:5169892. doi: 10.1155/2022/5169892. eCollection 2022.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19107. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019107.
4
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Dyspepsia in Korea.韩国功能性消化不良临床实践指南。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Jan 30;26(1):29-50. doi: 10.5056/jnm19209.
5
Current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of functional dyspepsia.功能性消化不良的治疗选择:现状和进展。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020 Feb;21(3):365-376. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1707805. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Economic Impact and Prognostic Factors of Functional Dyspepsia in Children.儿童功能性消化不良的经济影响和预后因素。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Apr;70(4):e65-e70. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002599.
7
Novel concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of functional dyspepsia.功能性消化不良的病理生理学和治疗的新概念。
Gut. 2020 Mar;69(3):591-600. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318536. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Duodenal eosinophilia is associated with functional dyspepsia and new onset gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.十二指肠炎性嗜酸性粒细胞增多与功能性消化不良和新发生的胃食管反流病有关。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;50(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/apt.15308. Epub 2019 May 20.
9
Postprandial distress syndrome: stratification and management.餐后不适综合征:分层与管理。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;13(1):37-46. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1543586. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics.益生菌的作用机制。
Adv Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;10(suppl_1):S49-S66. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy063.