文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

评价在接受常规药物治疗的患者中,益生菌给药后主要功能性消化不良症状的改善情况。

Evaluation of main functional dyspepsia symptoms after probiotic administration in patients receiving conventional pharmacological therapies.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, 9304University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Gastroenterology Unit, Avellino Hospital, Avellino, Italy.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520982657. doi: 10.1177/0300060520982657.


DOI:10.1177/0300060520982657
PMID:33472489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7829611/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) are the two main forms of functional dyspepsia (FD). Probiotics are a promising therapy for FD, but current data remains heterogeneous. This work aims to evaluate a probiotic combination of LR04 (DSM 16605), LPS01 (DSM 21980), LP01 (LMG P-21021), and subsp. LDD01 (DMS 22106), alone or together with other pharmacological therapies, for clinical improvement of symptoms associated with FD. METHODS: Patients with FD were enrolled and divided into two groups: PDS and EPS. Probiotic alone or combined with prokinetics, antacids, or proton-pump-inhibitors were administered for 30 days. A progressive-score scale was used to evaluate symptoms in all patients at the beginning of the trial and at 15 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS: A cohort of 2676 patients were enrolled (1 357 with PDS; 1 319 with EPS). All patients showed significant improvements in dyspeptic symptoms following treatment. In patients with PDS, probiotic alone resulted in the lowest prevalence of symptoms following treatment, while patients with EPS showed no clear between-treatment differences. CONCLUSIONS: Dyspeptic symptoms were reduced following treatment in all patients.

摘要

目的:餐后不适综合征(PDS)和上腹疼痛综合征(EPS)是功能性消化不良(FD)的两种主要形式。益生菌是治疗 FD 的一种很有前途的方法,但目前的数据仍然存在异质性。本研究旨在评估 LR04(DSM 16605)、LPS01(DSM 21980)、LP01(LMG P-21021)和 subsp. LDD01(DMS 22106)四种益生菌组合单独或与其他药物治疗联合应用,对 FD 相关症状的临床改善作用。

方法:纳入 FD 患者,并分为 PDS 和 EPS 两组。单独使用益生菌或联合使用促动力药、抗酸药或质子泵抑制剂治疗 30 天。在试验开始时和治疗结束后 15 天,所有患者均使用渐进评分量表评估症状。

结果:共纳入 2676 例患者(PDS 患者 1357 例,EPS 患者 1319 例)。所有患者的消化不良症状在治疗后均有显著改善。在 PDS 患者中,单独使用益生菌治疗后症状的发生率最低,而 EPS 患者之间的治疗差异不明显。

结论:所有患者的消化不良症状在治疗后均有所减轻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/9d0b1b9612e5/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/88d2cd021195/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/57704ff44069/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/9d0b1b9612e5/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/88d2cd021195/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/57704ff44069/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/7829611/9d0b1b9612e5/10.1177_0300060520982657-fig3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of main functional dyspepsia symptoms after probiotic administration in patients receiving conventional pharmacological therapies.

J Int Med Res. 2021-1

[2]
The innovative potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LR06, Lactobacillus pentosus LPS01, Lactobacillus plantarum LP01, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii Subsp. delbrueckii LDD01 to restore the "gastric barrier effect" in patients chronically treated with PPI: a pilot study.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012-10

[3]
Rome III functional dyspepsia subdivision in PDS and EPS: recognizing postprandial symptoms reduces overlap.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015-8

[4]
Discriminant value of Rome III questionnaire in dyspeptic patients.

Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011

[5]
Current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of functional dyspepsia.

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020-1-3

[6]
[Functional Dyspepsia].

Korean J Gastroenterol. 2019-2-25

[7]
Analysis of Postprandial Symptom Patterns in Subgroups of Patients With Rome III or Rome IV Functional Dyspepsia.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020-4

[8]
Pathophysiological Abnormalities in Functional Dyspepsia Subgroups According to the Rome III Criteria.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-1

[9]
Therapeutic options for functional dyspepsia.

Dig Dis. 2014

[10]
Prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux in patients with functional dyspepsia based on the Rome III criteria.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010-9-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Dietary microbes and functional dyspepsia: modulating the gut microecology for therapeutic benefit.

Front Nutr. 2025-8-19

[2]
Clinical efficacy of probiotics in improving intestinal mucosal permeability for functional dyspepsia patients with anxiety.

Front Microbiol. 2025-6-18

[3]
HP7 Improves Gastric Emptying by Modulating Digestive Factors in a Loperamide-Induced Functional Dyspepsia Mouse Model.

J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025-3-11

[4]
Relative Frequency of Gastrointestinal Functional Disorders in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Based on Rome IV: A Case-Control Study.

Adv Biomed Res. 2024-7-29

[5]
Research Progress for Probiotics Regulating Intestinal Flora to Improve Functional Dyspepsia: A Review.

Foods. 2024-1-2

[6]
Gut Microbiome-Brain Alliance: A Landscape View into Mental and Gastrointestinal Health and Disorders.

ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023-5-17

[7]
Food, Dietary Patterns, or Is Eating Behavior to Blame? Analyzing the Nutritional Aspects of Functional Dyspepsia.

Nutrients. 2023-3-22

[8]
Probiotics in Functional Dyspepsia.

Microorganisms. 2023-1-31

[9]
Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders with Psychiatric Symptoms: Involvement of the Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis in the Pathophysiology and Case Management.

Microorganisms. 2022-11-7

[10]
Effect of Kvass on Improving Functional Dyspepsia in Rats.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2022

本文引用的文献

[1]
Structural Stability and Viability of Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria: A Review.

Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013-11

[2]
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Functional Dyspepsia.

Microorganisms. 2020-5-8

[3]
Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020-2

[4]
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Dyspepsia in Korea.

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020-1-30

[5]
Current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of functional dyspepsia.

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020-1-3

[6]
Economic Impact and Prognostic Factors of Functional Dyspepsia in Children.

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020-4

[7]
Novel concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of functional dyspepsia.

Gut. 2019-11-29

[8]
Duodenal eosinophilia is associated with functional dyspepsia and new onset gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019-5-20

[9]
Postprandial distress syndrome: stratification and management.

Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018-11-8

[10]
Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics.

Adv Nutr. 2019-1-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索