• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Smoker profiles and their influence on smokers' intention to use a digital decision aid aimed at the uptake of evidence-based smoking cessation tools: An explorative study.吸烟者概况及其对吸烟者使用旨在采用循证戒烟工具的数字决策辅助工具意愿的影响:一项探索性研究。
Digit Health. 2020 Dec 29;6:2055207620980241. doi: 10.1177/2055207620980241. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Using the internet to understand smokers' treatment preferences: informing strategies to increase demand.利用互联网了解吸烟者的治疗偏好:提高需求的告知策略
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 26;13(3):e58. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1666.
3
[Awareness of harm to others from secondhand smoke and smokers' interest in smoking cessation].[对二手烟对他人危害的认知及吸烟者的戒烟意愿]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2018;65(11):655-665. doi: 10.11236/jph.65.11_655.
4
Prioritizing the mHealth Design Space: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Smokers' Perspectives.优先考虑移动医疗设计空间:对吸烟者观点的混合方法分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 5;4(3):e95. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5742.
5
Socio-economic status in relation to smoking: The role of (expected and desired) social support and quitter identity.与吸烟相关的社会经济地位:(预期和期望的)社会支持及戒烟者身份的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
6
Short-term fluctuations in motivation to quit smoking in a sample of smokers in Hawaii.夏威夷吸烟者样本中戒烟动机的短期波动。
Subst Use Misuse. 2015 Jan;50(2):236-41. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.966846. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Subtypes of smokers in a randomized controlled trial of a web-based smoking cessation program and their role in predicting intervention non-usage attrition: Implications for the development of tailored interventions.一项基于网络的戒烟项目随机对照试验中吸烟者的亚型及其在预测干预未使用损耗方面的作用:对定制干预措施发展的启示
Internet Interv. 2021 Oct 18;26:100473. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100473. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Identifying smoker subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation attempt probability: A decision tree analysis approach.识别具有高与低戒烟尝试概率的吸烟者亚组:决策树分析方法。
Addict Behav. 2020 Apr;103:106258. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106258. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
9
Youth smokers' beliefs about different cessation approaches: are we providing cessation interventions they never intend to use?青少年吸烟者对不同戒烟方法的看法:我们提供的戒烟干预措施是不是他们根本就不想采用的?
Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Sep;18(7):783-91. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9022-8. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
10
The Usability of an Online Tool to Promote the Use of Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Interventions.在线工具促进使用基于证据的戒烟干预措施的可用性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 15;18(20):10836. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010836.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Digital Decision Aid When Choosing Between Face-to-Face and Guided Internet-Based Psychological Interventions for Depression Among Chinese-Speaking Participants in Hong Kong: Randomized Controlled Trial.数字决策辅助工具对香港讲中文参与者在面对面与基于互联网引导的抑郁症心理干预之间进行选择时的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e54727. doi: 10.2196/54727.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical power for cluster analysis.聚类分析的统计功效。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 May 31;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04675-1.
2
Effectiveness of decision aids for smoking cessation in adults: a quantitative systematic review.成人戒烟决策辅助工具的有效性:一项定量系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 Sep;16(9):1791-1822. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003698.
3
A novel patient decision aid for aftercare in breast cancer patients: A promising tool to reduce costs by individualizing aftercare.一种新的乳腺癌患者康复后护理决策辅助工具:通过个性化康复后护理降低成本的有前景的工具。
Breast. 2018 Oct;41:144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
The development of an online decision aid to support persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision-making: a usability and pilot study.开发一种在线决策辅助工具,以在生殖决策过程中支持有癌症遗传易感性的人群及其伴侣:一项可用性和试点研究。
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0092-4.
5
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.戒烟的护理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub5.
6
Subgroups Among Smokers in Preparation: A Cluster Analysis Using the I-Change Model.准备戒烟者中的亚组:基于行为改变阶段模型的聚类分析
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Feb 23;53(3):400-411. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1334062. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
7
Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.围手术期与疼痛医学领域问卷的开发、翻译及验证指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
8
Internal health locus of control predicts willingness to track health behaviors online and with smartphone applications.内部健康控制源预测了人们愿意在线和使用智能手机应用程序来跟踪健康行为的意愿。
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Dec;22(10):1224-1229. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1317354. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
10
Assessing the impact of autonomous motivation and psychological need satisfaction in explaining adherence to an exercise referral scheme.评估自主动机和心理需求满足在解释对运动转诊计划的依从性方面的影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Oct;22(9):1056-1062. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1274041. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

吸烟者概况及其对吸烟者使用旨在采用循证戒烟工具的数字决策辅助工具意愿的影响:一项探索性研究。

Smoker profiles and their influence on smokers' intention to use a digital decision aid aimed at the uptake of evidence-based smoking cessation tools: An explorative study.

作者信息

Gültzow Thomas, Smit Eline Suzanne, Hudales Raesita, Dirksen Carmen D, Hoving Ciska

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2020 Dec 29;6:2055207620980241. doi: 10.1177/2055207620980241. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2055207620980241
PMID:33473322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7783882/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based smoking cessation support tools (EBSTs) can double the quitting chances, but uptake among smokers is low. A digital decision aid (DA) could help smokers choose an EBST in concordance with their values and preferences, but it is unclear which type of smokers are interested in a digital DA. We hypothesized that smokers' general decision-making style (GDMS) could be used to identify early adopters. This study therefore aimed to identify smoker profiles based on smokers' GDMS and investigate these profiles' association with intention to use a digital DA.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional dataset (N = 200 smokers intending to quit) was used to perform a hierarchical cluster analysis based on smokers' GDMS scores.

METHODS

Clusters were compared on demographic and socio-cognitive variables. Mediation analyses were conducted to see if the relationship between cluster membership and intention was mediated through socio-cognitive variables (e.g., attitude).

RESULTS

Two clusters were identified; (n = 134) were more avoidant, more regretful and tended to depend more on others in their decision making, while (n = 66) were more spontaneous and intuitive in their decision making. Cluster membership was significantly related to intention to use a DA, with being more interested. Yet, this association ceased to be significant when corrected for socio-cognitive variables (e.g., attitude). This indicates that cluster membership affected intention via socio-cognitive variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The GDMS can be used to identify smokers who are interested in a digital DA early on. As such, the GDMS can be used to tailor recruitment and DA content.

摘要

目的

基于证据的戒烟支持工具(EBSTs)可使戒烟几率翻倍,但吸烟者对其的采用率较低。数字决策辅助工具(DA)可帮助吸烟者根据自身价值观和偏好选择EBSTs,但尚不清楚哪种类型的吸烟者对数字DA感兴趣。我们假设吸烟者的一般决策风格(GDMS)可用于识别早期采用者。因此,本研究旨在根据吸烟者的GDMS识别吸烟者特征,并调查这些特征与使用数字DA意愿之间的关联。

设计

使用一个横断面数据集(N = 200名打算戒烟的吸烟者),根据吸烟者的GDMS得分进行分层聚类分析。

方法

比较各聚类在人口统计学和社会认知变量方面的情况。进行中介分析,以查看聚类成员身份与意愿之间的关系是否通过社会认知变量(如态度)进行中介。

结果

识别出两个聚类;[聚类1](n = 134)更倾向于回避、更易后悔,并且在决策时往往更依赖他人,而[聚类2](n = 66)在决策时更自发、更直观。聚类成员身份与使用DA的意愿显著相关,[聚类2]更感兴趣。然而,在对社会认知变量(如态度)进行校正后,这种关联不再显著。这表明聚类成员身份通过社会认知变量影响意愿。

结论

GDMS可用于早期识别对数字DA感兴趣的吸烟者。因此,GDMS可用于定制招募方式和DA内容。