• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
General populations' preferences for colorectal cancer screening: rationale and protocol for the discrete choice experiment in the SIGMO study.一般人群对结直肠癌筛查的偏好:SIGMO 研究中离散选择实验的原理和方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):e042399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042399.
2
Additional offer of sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening in Germany: rationale and protocol of the decision-analytic modelling approach in the SIGMO study.德国结直肠癌筛查中乙状结肠镜检查的附加建议:SIGMO 研究中决策分析模型方法的基本原理和方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e050698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050698.
3
Heterogeneous Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Germany: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.德国结直肠癌筛查的异质性偏好:一项离散选择实验的结果
Value Health. 2023 Jan;26(1):104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
4
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.结直肠癌筛查策略的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Mar 16;102(6):972-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605566. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
5
Public, medical professionals' and patients' preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments.公众、医学专业人员和患者对移植供体器官分配的偏好:离散选择实验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e026040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026040.
6
Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening.健康经济学中标记与未标记离散选择实验:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):315-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00670.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
7
Physicians' view on sigmoidoscopy as an additionally offered method for colorectal cancer screening.医生对乙状结肠镜检查作为额外提供的结直肠癌筛查方法的看法。
Z Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;57(9):1059-1066. doi: 10.1055/a-0963-0433. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
Colorectal cancer screening preferences among physicians and individuals at average risk: A discrete choice experiment.普通风险人群中医生和个体对结直肠癌筛查的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Cancer Med. 2022 Aug;11(16):3156-3167. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4678. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
9
Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.结直肠癌筛查意愿性调查研究中的属性及其对受检者决策的相对重要性:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Sep 22;12(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00394-8.
10
What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?影响人们决定参与粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查进行结直肠癌筛查的因素有哪些?
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of distal adenoma and hyperplastic polyp characteristics with long-term proximal colon cancer risk: a secondary, observational analysis of data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial.远端腺瘤及增生性息肉特征与近端结肠癌长期风险的关联:来自英国乙状结肠镜筛查试验数据的二次观察性分析
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 23;12(1):e001787. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001787.
2
Intended and Actual Participation in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.结直肠癌筛查项目的预期参与情况与实际参与情况。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jul 26;121(15):497-504. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0087.
3
Cancer Screening: Present Recommendations, the Development of Multi-Cancer Early Development Tests, and the Prospect of Universal Cancer Screening.癌症筛查:当前建议、多癌早期检测试验的发展以及普遍癌症筛查的前景。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;16(6):1191. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061191.
4
National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea.韩国的国家结直肠癌筛查计划。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Dec;105(6):333-340. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.6.333. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.结直肠癌筛查意愿性调查研究中的属性及其对受检者决策的相对重要性:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Sep 22;12(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00394-8.
6
Attributes Characterizing Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests That Influence Preferences of Individuals Eligible for Screening in Germany: A Qualitative Study.影响德国符合筛查条件个体偏好的结直肠癌筛查测试特征:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 10;16:2051-2066. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S365429. eCollection 2022.
7
Additional offer of sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening in Germany: rationale and protocol of the decision-analytic modelling approach in the SIGMO study.德国结直肠癌筛查中乙状结肠镜检查的附加建议:SIGMO 研究中决策分析模型方法的基本原理和方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e050698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050698.

本文引用的文献

1
Linkage of Routine Data to Other Data Sources in Germany: A Practical Example Illustrating Challenges and Solutions.德国常规数据与其他数据源的关联:一个说明挑战与解决方案的实际案例
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Mar;82(S 02):S117-S121. doi: 10.1055/a-0999-5509. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
2
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.粪便检测、乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 2;9(10):e032773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032773.
3
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline.粪便免疫化学检测、乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查筛查结直肠癌:临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 2;367:l5515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5515.
4
Physicians' view on sigmoidoscopy as an additionally offered method for colorectal cancer screening.医生对乙状结肠镜检查作为额外提供的结直肠癌筛查方法的看法。
Z Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;57(9):1059-1066. doi: 10.1055/a-0963-0433. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
5
The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments.离散选择实验数据的内部有效性:一种用于定量评估的测试工具。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.876. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
7
Factors associated with the efficacy of polyp detection during routine flexible sigmoidoscopy.与常规乙状结肠镜检查中息肉检测效果相关的因素。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;9(2):135-142. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100849. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
8
The IARC Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening.国际癌症研究机构对结直肠癌筛查的观点。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1734-1740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1714643. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
Long term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.17年随访后单次柔性乙状结肠镜筛查的长期效果:英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查随机对照试验
Lancet. 2017 Apr 1;389(10076):1299-1311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30396-3. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
10
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.

一般人群对结直肠癌筛查的偏好:SIGMO 研究中离散选择实验的原理和方案。

General populations' preferences for colorectal cancer screening: rationale and protocol for the discrete choice experiment in the SIGMO study.

机构信息

Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):e042399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042399.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042399
PMID:33478964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7825272/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In Germany, the organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme includes the immunologic faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy. The sigmoidoscopy is recommended for individuals rejecting colonoscopy but is not included into the screening programme. To examine whether the evidence based sigmoidoscopy should be additionally offered, the first objective of this study is to evaluate the demand for sigmoidoscopy by analysing the German general populations' preferences for CRC screening.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Preference data will be collected using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Identification and selection of the attributes and their levels will be supported by evidence resulting from a systematic literature search and focus groups. An efficient, fractional factorial choice design will be generated. In a cross-sectional study, the DCE will be administered as a written questionnaire to a random sample of 4000 members of the statutory health insurance company in Lower Saxony (AOK Lower Saxony). Insured persons 50-60 years of age without CRC or a chronic inflammatory bowel disease will be eligible. The collected choice data will be analysed by conducting a conditional logit regression model and latent class models.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Hannover Medical School (reference number 8671_BO_K_2019). The study results will be disseminated via conference presentations, publications in peer-reviewed journals and, to participants, the membership magazine of the AOK Lower Saxony.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00019010.

摘要

简介

在德国,组织化的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划包括免疫粪便潜血试验和结肠镜检查。对于拒绝结肠镜检查的个体,推荐进行乙状结肠镜检查,但该检查不包含在筛查计划中。为了研究是否应该额外提供基于证据的乙状结肠镜检查,本研究的首要目标是通过分析德国普通人群对 CRC 筛查的偏好来评估对乙状结肠镜检查的需求。

方法和分析

偏好数据将通过离散选择实验(DCE)收集。属性及其水平的识别和选择将得到系统文献检索和焦点小组的证据支持。将生成一个有效的、分数阶的因子设计。在一项横断面研究中,DCE 将作为书面问卷分发给下萨克森州法定健康保险公司(AOK 下萨克森)的 4000 名随机样本。年龄在 50-60 岁之间、没有 CRC 或慢性炎症性肠病的参保人员符合条件。通过进行条件逻辑回归模型和潜在类别模型分析收集的选择数据。

伦理和传播

本研究已获得汉诺威医学院伦理委员会的批准(编号 8671_BO_K_2019)。研究结果将通过会议演讲、同行评议期刊发表以及 AOK 下萨克森会员杂志向参与者传播。

注册号

DRKS00019010。