德国西南部儿童及其父母中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的流行情况。
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children and Their Parents in Southwest Germany.
机构信息
Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Virology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
出版信息
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jun 1;175(6):586-593. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0001.
IMPORTANCE
School and daycare closures were enforced as measures to confine the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, based on the assumption that young children may play a key role in severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread. Given the grave consequences of contact restrictions for children, a better understanding of their contribution to the COVID-19 pandemic is of great importance.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections and the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in children aged 1 to 10 years, compared with a corresponding parent of each child, in a population-based sample.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This large-scale, multicenter, cross-sectional investigation (the COVID-19 BaWü study) enrolled children aged 1 to 10 years and a corresponding parent between April 22 and May 15, 2020, in southwest Germany.
EXPOSURES
Potential exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The main outcomes were infection and seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2. Participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA from nasopharyngeal swabs by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies in serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunofluorescence tests. Discordant results were clarified by electrochemiluminescence immunoassays, a second enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or an in-house Luminex-based assay.
RESULTS
This study included 4964 participants: 2482 children (median age, 6 [range, 1-10] years; 1265 boys [51.0%]) and 2482 parents (median age, 40 [range, 23-66] years; 615 men [24.8%]). Two participants (0.04%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was low in parents (1.8% [95% CI, 1.2-2.4%]) and 3-fold lower in children (0.6% [95% CI, 0.3-1.0%]). Among 56 families with at least 1 child or parent with seropositivity, the combination of a parent with seropositivity and a corresponding child with seronegativity was 4.3 (95% CI, 1.19-15.52) times higher than the combination of a parent who was seronegative and a corresponding child with seropositivity. We observed virus-neutralizing activity for 66 of 70 IgG-positive serum samples (94.3%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cross-sectional study, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection during a period of lockdown in southwest Germany was particularly low in children aged 1 to 10 years. Accordingly, it is unlikely that children have boosted the pandemic. This SARS-CoV-2 prevalence study, which appears to be the largest focusing on children, is instructive for how ad hoc mass testing provides the basis for rational political decision-making in a pandemic.
重要性
学校和日托所关闭是为了限制新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)大流行而采取的措施,这是基于这样的假设,即幼儿可能在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)传播中发挥关键作用。鉴于对儿童实施接触限制的严重后果,更好地了解他们对 COVID-19 大流行的贡献非常重要。
目的
描述在一个基于人群的样本中,年龄在 1 至 10 岁的儿童与每个儿童的相应父母相比,感染 SARS-CoV-2 的比率和 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清阳性率。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项大规模、多中心、横断面调查(COVID-19 BaWü 研究),于 2020 年 4 月 22 日至 5 月 15 日在德国西南部招募了 1 至 10 岁的儿童及其相应的父母。
暴露情况
可能接触 SARS-CoV-2。
主要结果和措施
主要结果是 SARS-CoV-2 感染和血清阳性率。通过逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)从鼻咽拭子中检测 SARS-CoV-2 RNA,通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和免疫荧光试验检测血清中的 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgG 抗体。通过电化学发光免疫分析、第二酶联免疫吸附试验或内部 Luminex 测定来澄清不一致的结果。
结果
本研究纳入了 4964 名参与者:2482 名儿童(中位数年龄 6 [范围 1-10] 岁;1265 名男孩[51.0%])和 2482 名父母(中位数年龄 40 [范围 23-66] 岁;615 名男性[24.8%])。有 2 名参与者(0.04%)的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 检测呈阳性。父母的 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率较低(1.8% [95% CI,1.2-2.4%]),儿童的 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率低 3 倍(0.6% [95% CI,0.3-1.0%])。在至少有 1 名儿童或父母血清阳性的 56 个家庭中,父母血清阳性和相应儿童血清阴性的组合的可能性是父母血清阴性和相应儿童血清阳性的组合的 4.3(95% CI,1.19-15.52)倍。在 70 份 IgG 阳性血清样本中,我们观察到 66 份具有病毒中和活性(94.3%)。
结论和相关性
在这项横断面研究中,在德国西南部的封锁期间,SARS-CoV-2 感染在 1 至 10 岁儿童中的传播特别低。因此,儿童不太可能助长大流行。这项 SARS-CoV-2 患病率研究似乎是针对儿童的最大研究,为在大流行期间临时大规模检测如何为合理的政治决策提供依据提供了指导。
相似文献
JAMA Pediatr. 2021-6-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2021-11-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2021-11-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2022-3-1
引用本文的文献
Online J Public Health Inform. 2024-10-29
Vaccines (Basel). 2024-7-3
Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2023
Cell Rep Methods. 2023-8-28
本文引用的文献
Immunity. 2020-6-23
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020-6-27
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2021-2
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020-5-22