Suppr超能文献

HFpEF 而右心室收缩压不升高是 IPF 患者因心力衰竭住院的有利预后指标。

HFpEF without elevated right ventricular systolic pressure is a favorable prognostic indicator in patients with IPF requiring hospitalization for heart failure.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245778. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) must be hospitalized because of heart failure (HF), including HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). The association between IPF and HF has not been clarified. We retrospectively investigated the clinical features and outcomes of patients with IPF who required nonelective hospitalization because of HF.

METHODS

We examined data from IPF patients who required nonelective hospitalization for HF at the Kindai University Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018. We divided the patients into 3 groups: those with HFpEF without elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), those with HFpEF and elevated RVSP, and those with HFrEF. The recurrence rates of HF after discharge and the 30- and 90-day mortality rates of the patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 37 patients with IPF required hospitalization because of HF. Among the 34 patients included in the study, 17 (50.0%) were diagnosed with HFpEF without elevated RVSP, 11 (32.3%) with HFpEF and elevated RVSP, and 6 (17.6%) with HFrEF. Patients with HFrEF had significantly higher values for B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular (LV) end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters than patients with the 2 types of HFpEF (BNP: P = 0.01 and P = 0.0004, LV end-systolic diameter: P <0.0001 and P <0.0001, and LV end-diastolic diameter: P = 0.01 and P = 0.0004, respectively). Notably, the difference between the LVEFs of the patients with 2 types of HFpEF was not significant. The patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP had the lowest 30- and 90-day mortality rates (0%, P = 0.02 and 11.7%, P = 0.11, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with IPF, HFpEF without elevated RVSP was the most common type of HF that required hospitalization. Patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP survived longer than the patients with the other 2 types of HF.

摘要

背景

一些特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者因心力衰竭(HF)必须住院,包括射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)和射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)。IPF 和 HF 之间的关系尚未明确。我们回顾性研究了因 HF 而需要非择期住院的 IPF 患者的临床特征和结局。

方法

我们检查了 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在日本近畿大学医院因 HF 而需要非择期住院的 IPF 患者的数据。我们将患者分为 3 组:无右心室收缩压升高的 HFpEF 组、有右心室收缩压升高的 HFpEF 组和 HFrEF 组。评估了出院后 HF 的复发率和患者的 30 天和 90 天死亡率。

结果

在研究期间,37 名 IPF 患者因 HF 住院。在纳入研究的 34 名患者中,17 名(50.0%)被诊断为无右心室收缩压升高的 HFpEF,11 名(32.3%)为有右心室收缩压升高的 HFpEF,6 名(17.6%)为 HFrEF。与 2 种类型的 HFpEF 患者相比,HFrEF 患者的 B 型利钠肽(BNP)和左心室(LV)收缩末期和舒张末期直径显著更高(BNP:P = 0.01 和 P = 0.0004,LV 收缩末期直径:P <0.0001 和 P <0.0001,LV 舒张末期直径:P = 0.01 和 P = 0.0004,分别)。值得注意的是,2 种类型的 HFpEF 患者的 LVEF 之间没有显著差异。无右心室收缩压升高的 HFpEF 患者的 30 天和 90 天死亡率最低(0%,P = 0.02 和 11.7%,P = 0.11,分别)。

结论

在 IPF 患者中,无右心室收缩压升高的 HFpEF 是最常见的需要住院的 HF 类型。无右心室收缩压升高的 HFpEF 患者的存活率高于其他 2 种类型的 HF 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c72e/7822325/f68c430f9236/pone.0245778.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验