• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对疑似 COVID-19 的急性病成年人的临床严重程度评分的推导和验证:PRIEST 观察性队列研究。

Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Intensive Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245840. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0245840
PMID:33481930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7822515/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to derive and validate a triage tool, based on clinical assessment alone, for predicting adverse outcome in acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

We undertook a mixed prospective and retrospective observational cohort study in 70 emergency departments across the United Kingdom (UK). We collected presenting data from 22445 people attending with suspected COVID-19 between 26 March 2020 and 28 May 2020. The primary outcome was death or organ support (respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal) by record review at 30 days. We split the cohort into derivation and validation sets, developed a clinical score based on the coefficients from multivariable analysis using the derivation set, and the estimated discriminant performance using the validation set.

RESULTS

We analysed 11773 derivation and 9118 validation cases. Multivariable analysis identified that age, sex, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation/inspired oxygen ratio, performance status, consciousness, history of renal impairment, and respiratory distress were retained in analyses restricted to the ten or fewer predictors. We used findings from multivariable analysis and clinical judgement to develop a score based on the NEWS2 score, age, sex, and performance status. This had a c-statistic of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.81) in the validation cohort and predicted adverse outcome with sensitivity 0.98 (0.97-0.98) and specificity 0.34 (0.34-0.35) for scores above four points.

CONCLUSION

A clinical score based on NEWS2, age, sex, and performance status predicts adverse outcome with good discrimination in adults with suspected COVID-19 and can be used to support decision-making in emergency care.

REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN28342533, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN28342533.

摘要

目的

我们旨在开发并验证一种仅基于临床评估的分诊工具,用于预测疑似 COVID-19 感染的急性病成年人的不良结局。

方法

我们在英国(UK)的 70 个急诊部门进行了一项混合前瞻性和回顾性观察队列研究。我们收集了 2020 年 3 月 26 日至 2020 年 5 月 28 日期间因疑似 COVID-19 就诊的 22445 人的就诊数据。主要结局是通过 30 天的记录回顾评估死亡或器官支持(呼吸、心血管或肾脏)。我们将队列分为推导集和验证集,基于推导集的多变量分析系数开发临床评分,并使用验证集估计判别性能。

结果

我们分析了 11773 个推导集和 9118 个验证集。多变量分析确定年龄、性别、呼吸频率、收缩压、氧饱和度/吸氧比、表现状态、意识、肾功能损害史和呼吸困难是限制在十个或更少预测因素分析中保留的因素。我们使用多变量分析和临床判断的结果,在 NEWS2 评分、年龄、性别和表现状态的基础上开发了一种评分。在验证队列中,该评分的 C 统计量为 0.80(95%置信区间 0.79-0.81),预测不良结局的敏感度为 0.98(0.97-0.98),特异性为 0.34(0.34-0.35),评分高于四分。

结论

基于 NEWS2、年龄、性别和表现状态的临床评分可对疑似 COVID-19 的成年人进行良好的不良结局预测,可用于支持急诊决策。

登记

ISRCTN 注册表,ISRCTN28342533,http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN28342533。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/d7291b903069/pone.0245840.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/5f4658a8c829/pone.0245840.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/0cc890779987/pone.0245840.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/754f0908090a/pone.0245840.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/d7291b903069/pone.0245840.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/5f4658a8c829/pone.0245840.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/0cc890779987/pone.0245840.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/754f0908090a/pone.0245840.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/7822515/d7291b903069/pone.0245840.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study.一项针对疑似 COVID-19 的急性病成年人的临床严重程度评分的推导和验证:PRIEST 观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245840. eCollection 2021.
2
Characterisation of 22445 patients attending UK emergency departments with suspected COVID-19 infection: Observational cohort study.22445 名英国急诊科疑似 COVID-19 感染患者的特征:观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0240206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240206. eCollection 2020.
3
Prognostic accuracy of emergency department triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19: the PRIEST observational cohort study.成人疑似 COVID-19 患者的急诊科分诊工具的预后准确性:PRIEST 观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):587-593. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210783. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting.中低收入国家急性 COVID-19 疑似成人患者临床严重程度评分的推导和验证
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0287091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287091. eCollection 2023.
5
LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting.低收入和中等收入国家-预测急性疾病严重程度的临床评分工具:针对中等收入环境下疑似新冠肺炎成年急性病患者的临床严重程度评分的推导与验证
medRxiv. 2022 Nov 7:2022.11.06.22281986. doi: 10.1101/2022.11.06.22281986.
6
Post-exertion oxygen saturation as a prognostic factor for adverse outcome in patients attending the emergency department with suspected COVID-19: a substudy of the PRIEST observational cohort study.运动后血氧饱和度作为疑似 COVID-19 急诊患者不良结局的预后因素:PRIEST 观察性队列研究的亚研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Feb;38(2):88-93. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210528. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Evaluation and improvement of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) for COVID-19: a multi-hospital study.评估和改进 COVID-19 的国家早期预警评分(NEWS2):一项多医院研究。
BMC Med. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01893-3.
8
External validation of triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting: an observational cohort study.在中等收入环境中对疑似 COVID-19 的成年人使用分诊工具进行外部验证:一项观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Jul;40(7):509-517. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212827. Epub 2023 May 22.
9
Prognostic accuracy of triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19 in a prehospital setting: an observational cohort study.在院前环境中,用于疑似 COVID-19 成人的分诊工具的预后准确性:一项观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Apr;39(4):317-324. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211934. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
10
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions in people admitted with suspected COVID-19: Secondary analysis of the PRIEST observational cohort study.不建议对疑似 COVID-19 入院患者进行心肺复苏(DNACPR)决策:PRIEST 观察性队列研究的二次分析。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jul;164:130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.028. Epub 2021 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the ALKA and CRS scores to predict outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in United Arab Emirates.比较ALKA和CRS评分以预测阿拉伯联合酋长国2019冠状病毒病感染患者的预后。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1553189. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1553189. eCollection 2025.
2
The C2HEST score on admission to hospital may successfully predict clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in the all-comers population.入院时的C2HEST评分可能成功预测所有患者人群中COVID-19的临床结局。
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Jul 28;21(3):817-827. doi: 10.5114/aoms/190744. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancements in Managing Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholangitis in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic accuracy of emergency department triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19: the PRIEST observational cohort study.成人疑似 COVID-19 患者的急诊科分诊工具的预后准确性:PRIEST 观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):587-593. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210783. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
Characterisation of 22445 patients attending UK emergency departments with suspected COVID-19 infection: Observational cohort study.22445 名英国急诊科疑似 COVID-19 感染患者的特征:观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0240206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240206. eCollection 2020.
3
Development and Validation of the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index: A Prognostic Tool for Early Clinical Decompensation.
老年患者胆总管结石及急性胆管炎管理的进展:一项综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78492. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
The first assessment of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 1 (ACE1) D/I polymorphism and demographic factors in association with COVID-19 outcomes in the Moroccan Population.对摩洛哥人群中血管紧张素转换酶1(ACE1)D/I多态性及人口统计学因素与COVID-19结局相关性的首次评估。
Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Jan 8;52(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-10211-6.
5
Accuracy of the Canadian COVID-19 Mortality Score (CCMS) to predict in-hospital mortality among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients infected with Omicron: a cohort study.加拿大 COVID-19 死亡率评分 (CCMS) 预测感染奥密克戎的接种和未接种疫苗患者住院死亡率的准确性:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e083280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083280.
6
Usefulness of the CHADS-VASc Score in Predicting the Outcome in Subjects Hospitalized with COVID-19-A Subanalysis of the COLOS Study.CHADS-VASc评分在预测COVID-19住院患者预后中的作用——COLOS研究的亚分析
Microorganisms. 2024 Oct 13;12(10):2060. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12102060.
7
Development of a prediction model for 30-day COVID-19 hospitalization and death in a national cohort of Veterans Health Administration patients-March 2022-April 2023.开发一个预测模型,用于预测退伍军人健康管理局患者队列中 COVID-19 患者 30 天住院和死亡风险-2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 4 月。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 4;19(10):e0307235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307235. eCollection 2024.
8
Prehospital Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage score can effectively predict the 30-day mortality of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia.院前大流行呼吸道感染急症系统分诊评分可有效预测新冠肺炎合并肺炎患者的 30 天死亡率。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2407954. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2407954. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Evaluation of risk prediction scores for adults hospitalized with COVID-19 in a highly-vaccinated population, Aotearoa New Zealand 2022.2022年新西兰奥塔哥对高疫苗接种率人群中因新冠病毒病住院的成年人风险预测评分的评估
IJID Reg. 2024 Aug 13;12:100424. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100424. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Modeling and predicting individual variation in COVID-19 vaccine-elicited antibody response in the general population.模拟和预测普通人群中COVID-19疫苗引发的抗体反应的个体差异。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 3;3(5):e0000497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000497. eCollection 2024 May.
快速 COVID-19 严重程度指数的制定与验证:一种用于早期临床失代偿的预后工具。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):442-453. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score.利用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议对因 COVID-19 住院的患者进行风险分层:4C 死亡率评分的制定和验证。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3339.
5
National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) on admission predicts severe disease and in-hospital mortality from Covid-19 - a prospective cohort study.入院时的国家早期预警评分 2 (NEWS2)可预测新冠病毒疾病的严重程度和住院死亡率-一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 13;28(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00764-3.
6
Comparing Rapid Scoring Systems in Mortality Prediction of Critically Ill Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease.比较新型冠状病毒疾病危重症患者死亡率预测的快速评分系统。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;27(6):461-468. doi: 10.1111/acem.13992. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.COVID-19 诊断和预后预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328.
8
Novel coronavirus infection during the 2019-2020 epidemic: preparing intensive care units-the experience in Sichuan Province, China.2019 - 2020年疫情期间的新型冠状病毒感染:重症监护病房的准备——中国四川省的经验
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(2):357-360. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05954-2. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
9
Patient and public involvement in emergency care research.患者及公众参与急诊护理研究。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Sep;33(9):665-70. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205700. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
10
The PAndemic INfluenza Triage in the Emergency Department (PAINTED) pilot cohort study.急诊科大流行性流感分诊(PAINTED)试点队列研究
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(3):v-xxi, 1-69. doi: 10.3310/hta19030.