Suppr超能文献

《在综合内科门诊中应用标准化预诊实验室检测套餐的影响:一项对照性“开-关”试验》。

The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled "On-Off" Trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, F02.216, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1914-1920. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic.

DESIGN

An "on-off" trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks.

PARTICIPANTS

All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis.

INTERVENTION

In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction.

KEY RESULTS

There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87-1.22]; p = .71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p = .003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p < .001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0-69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0-68.5]; p < .001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NL5009.

摘要

背景

在一些情况下,诊断时间的缩短已被证明可以改善临床结果。实施快速实验室检测可以在门诊进行就诊前检测,这意味着检测结果可在首次门诊就诊时获得。

目的

确定在综合内科门诊就诊前进行实验室检测是否会缩短诊断时间。

设计

一项“开-关”试验,将患者按顺序分配到两个治疗组中的一个。

参与者

所有新转至大学医院内科门诊的患者均被纳入研究,不包括复诊患者。共有 595 名患者符合条件;1 人拒绝参与,因此对 594 名患者的数据进行了分析。

干预

在干预组中,患者在首次就诊前进行标准化的就诊前实验室检测。

主要观察指标

主要结局是诊断时间。次要结局包括第一天初步诊断的准确性、医疗保健的使用以及患者和医生的满意度。

主要结果

两组之间的诊断时间无差异(中位数 35 天 vs 35 天;风险比 1.03[0.87-1.22];p =.71)。就诊前检测组在第一天有更高比例的正确初步诊断(24% vs 14%;p =.003)和在第一天完成诊断性检查的比例(10% vs 3%;p <.001)。干预组进行了更多的实验室检查(50.0[四分位距(IQR)39.0-69.0] vs 43.0[IQR 31.0-68.5];p <.001)。除此之外,两组之间没有差异。

结论

就诊前检测并未导致整体诊断时间缩短。然而,第一天有更多的患者得到了正确的诊断。进一步的研究应集中于定制就诊前实验室检测,以提高其疗效。

临床试验注册

NL5009。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验