• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估“使用认知模型框架的多项选择题开发工作坊”的有效性:一项前后对照研究。

Evaluating the effectiveness of 'MCQ development workshop using cognitive model framework: A pre-post study.

作者信息

Ali Rahila, Sultan Amber Shamim, Zahid Nida

机构信息

Department for Educational Development, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Aga Khan University Hopspital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;71(1(A)):119-121. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1068.

DOI:10.47391/JPMA.1068
PMID:33484534
Abstract

A workshop on MCQ development using cognitive model framework was conducted for health educators from Aga Khan University (AKU) and other academic institutions. The aim was to develop the skill of preparing MCQs for assessing higher cognitive levels. A pre-post study was conducted, participant satisfaction was evaluated and pre-post test scores were used to assess learning capability of the workshop participants. Out of the 19 who attended the workshop, 16 participated in the pre- and post-tests and were included in the study through convenience sampling. The total duration of the study was six months. There was a significant difference in the overall pre-post test scores of the participants with a mean difference of -4.176 ± 4.83 (p-value < 0.05). A significant difference was observed in the mean pre-post test scores of junior faculty (-6.350± 4.5829; p-value = 0.02). The mean pre-test scores of junior faculty were significantly lower 4.950±2.83 as compared to the senior faculty 10.417±1.56 (p-value= 0.001). Active participation in faculty development workshops may lead to enhancing skills for preparing one-best MCQs based on international guidelines.

摘要

为阿迦汗大学(AKU)和其他学术机构的健康教育工作者举办了一场关于使用认知模型框架开发多项选择题的研讨会。目的是培养根据国际准则准备用于评估更高认知水平的多项选择题的技能。开展了一项前后对照研究,评估了参与者的满意度,并使用前后测试分数来评估研讨会参与者的学习能力。在参加研讨会的19人中,16人参加了前后测试,并通过便利抽样纳入研究。研究总时长为六个月。参与者的整体前后测试分数存在显著差异,平均差异为-4.176±4.83(p值<0.05)。在初级教员的前后测试平均分数中观察到显著差异(-6.350±4.5829;p值=0.02)。与高级教员的10.417±1.56相比,初级教员的前测平均分数显著更低,为4.950±2.83(p值=0.001)。积极参与教员发展研讨会可能会提高根据国际准则准备最佳多项选择题的技能。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of 'MCQ development workshop using cognitive model framework: A pre-post study.评估“使用认知模型框架的多项选择题开发工作坊”的有效性:一项前后对照研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;71(1(A)):119-121. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1068.
2
Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.短期培训课程能否提高牙科学院教师编写选择题的质量?一项试点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):948-955. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.047.
3
A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation.一场关于编写选择题的为期一天的牙科学院研讨会:影响评估。
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1305-13.
4
Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?评估教师发展计划倡议的影响:我们真的在提高 MCQ 写作技能吗?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2434-2438. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1207.
5
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Evaluation of One-Day Multiple-Choice Question Workshop for Anesthesiology Faculty Members.针对麻醉学教员的一日多项选择题研讨会评估
Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec 13;10(6):e111607. doi: 10.5812/aapm.111607. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
Construction of Multiple Choice Questions Before and After An Educational Intervention.教育干预前后多项选择题的构建
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017 Jan-Mar;56(205):112-116.
8
The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.一日研讨会对印度一所医学院生理学多项选择题编制质量的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 24;15(8):e44049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44049. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.纵向教师发展计划对多项选择题编写技能的有效性:一项随访研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185895. eCollection 2017.
10
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of artificial intelligence systems in answering prosthodontics questions from the dental specialty exam in Turkey.土耳其牙科专业考试中人工智能系统回答口腔修复学问题的比较
J Dent Sci. 2025 Jul;20(3):1454-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2025.01.025. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
The impact of repeated item development training on the prediction of medical faculty members' item difficulty index.
重复项目开发训练对预测医学教师项目难度指数的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 30;24(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05577-x.
4
Medical knowledge of ChatGPT in public health, infectious diseases, COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccines: multiple choice questions examination based performance.ChatGPT 在公共卫生、传染病、COVID-19 大流行和疫苗方面的医学知识:基于多项选择题考试的表现。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 17;12:1360597. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1360597. eCollection 2024.
5
ChatGPT Knowledge Evaluation in Basic and Clinical Medical Sciences: Multiple Choice Question Examination-Based Performance.基础医学与临床医学中ChatGPT的知识评估:基于多项选择题考试的表现
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 17;11(14):2046. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142046.