Suppr超能文献

奥马环素与莫西沙星治疗成人社区获得性细菌性肺炎的比较。

Omadacycline vs moxifloxacin in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

机构信息

Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.

Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) is a major clinical burden worldwide. In the phase III OPTIC study (NCT02531438) in CABP, omadacycline was found to be non-inferior to moxifloxacin for investigator-assessed clinical response (IACR) at post-treatment evaluation (PTE, 5-10 days after last dose). This article reports the efficacy findings, as specified in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (every 12 h for two doses, then every 24 h) with optional transition to 300 mg orally after 3 days, or moxifloxacin 400 mg intravenously (every 24 h) with optional transition to 400 mg orally after 3 days. The total treatment duration was 7-14 days. The primary endpoint for EMA efficacy analysis was IACR at PTE in patients with Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class III and IV.

RESULTS

In total, 660 patients were randomized as PORT risk class III and IV. Omadacycline was non-inferior to moxifloxacin at PTE. The clinical success rates were 88.4% and 85.2%, respectively [intent-to-treat population; difference 3.3; 97.5% confidence interval (CI) -2.7 to 9.3], and 92.5% and 90.5%, respectively (clinically evaluable population; difference 2.0; 97.5% CI 3.2-7.4). Clinical success rates with omadacycline and moxifloxacin were similar against identified pathogens and across key subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Omadacycline was non-inferior to moxifloxacin for IACR at PTE, with high clinical success across pathogen types and patient subgroups.

摘要

目的

社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)是全球范围内的重大临床负担。在 CABP 的 III 期 OPTIC 研究(NCT02531438)中,与莫西沙星相比,奥马环素在治疗后评估(PTE,末次给药后 5-10 天)时的研究者评估临床应答(IACR)方面显示出非劣效性。本文根据欧洲药品管理局(EMA)指南报告了疗效发现。

方法

患者以 1:1 的比例随机分为奥马环素 100mg 静脉注射(每 12 小时给药 2 次,然后每 24 小时给药 1 次),在第 3 天可以选择转为口服 300mg;或莫西沙星 400mg 静脉注射(每 24 小时给药 1 次),在第 3 天可以选择转为口服 400mg。总治疗时间为 7-14 天。EMA 疗效分析的主要终点是 PORT 风险分类 III 和 IV 的患者在 PTE 时的 IACR。

结果

共有 660 例患者被随机分为 PORT 风险分类 III 和 IV。奥马环素在 PTE 时不劣于莫西沙星。治疗成功率分别为 88.4%和 85.2%(意向治疗人群;差异 3.3;97.5%置信区间(CI)-2.7 至 9.3),分别为 92.5%和 90.5%(临床可评估人群;差异 2.0;97.5%CI 3.2-7.4)。奥马环素和莫西沙星的治疗成功率在确定的病原体和关键亚组中相似。

结论

奥马环素在 PTE 时不劣于莫西沙星,对各种病原体类型和患者亚组均有较高的临床成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验