Bond University Nutrition and Dietetics Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Bond University Nutrition and Dietetics Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Feb;41:340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.10.022. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Poor adherence to intensive care unit (ICU) guidelines is common, leading to suboptimal nutritional care. This study determined current ward-based nutrition care practices in the Indian ICU setting, comparing them to international best-practice guidelines and provided patient demographic, clinical and nutritional information to serve as baseline data for future benchmarking.
This multi-site cross-sectional retrospective study analysed data collected from nutritionDay worldwide audits (2012-2016) across ICUs from a chain of urban private hospitals in India. Additional guideline-specific data were collected through questionnaires and phone interviews with the Head of Dietetics Departments in the participating hospitals.
Overall, 10 ICUs and 457 participants were included. It was common practice to use modified versions of the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) for nutrition screening and assessment. Nearly half the participants (n = 222, 49%) received nutrition orally. A majority of the remaining participants received enteral nutrition (n = 163, 36%) or no nutrition (n = 60, 13%) at the time of data collection. The calories prescribed for most participants were between 1500 and 1999 kilocalories per day (n = 207, 45%), with no nutrition planned for 115 (25%) participants. Three-quarters (n = 129, 74%) of participants on EN received the planned calories, while 24% (n = 42) were given less than planned.
Overall, most participants received the calories planned for enteral nutrition. The use of modified screening and assessment tools and suboptimal delivery of EN remains a global problem for critical care, possibly requiring a more pragmatic approach to nutritional therapy.
在重症监护病房(ICU),普遍存在不遵守指南的情况,导致营养支持不理想。本研究旨在确定印度 ICU 中当前的病房营养护理实践,将其与国际最佳实践指南进行比较,并提供患者人口统计学、临床和营养信息,作为未来基准测试的基线数据。
本多中心、横断面、回顾性研究分析了 2012 年至 2016 年营养日全球审计在印度某连锁城市私立医院 ICU 收集的数据。通过问卷和电话访谈,向参与医院的营养科主任收集了特定指南的数据。
共纳入 10 个 ICU 和 457 名参与者。营养筛查和评估常用改良版 Mini 营养评估-短表(MNA-SF)和主观全面评估(SGA)。近一半的参与者(n=222,49%)经口接受营养。其余大部分参与者(n=163,36%)当时接受肠内营养,或(n=60,13%)未接受营养。大多数参与者(n=207,45%)接受的热量在 1500 至 1999 千卡/天之间,115 名(25%)参与者无营养计划。接受肠内营养的 3/4 (n=129,74%)参与者接受了计划的热量,而 24%(n=42)接受的热量少于计划。
总体而言,大多数接受肠内营养的参与者接受了计划的热量。改良的筛查和评估工具的使用以及肠内营养的不充分实施仍然是重症监护的全球性问题,可能需要采取更务实的营养治疗方法。